Månedens artikler 2.

Gå til side 1

Gå til side 3


Merk det nedenforstående

Den hemmelige Bilderbergergruppen har møte i Sverige. I Norske medier hører vi intet. En gresk Nato-innsider forteller om Bilderbergerne.

Noen svært interessante lenker
Jødenes katekisme i det tidligere Sovjetunionen. Utgitt i Tel Aviv. Dette dokumentet bekrefter vel egentlig ekteheten av saksinnholdet i Sions Vises Protokoller
Sionismens natur
Krigene på Balkan må ses i lys av Den Nye Verdensorden(DNV)
Martin Luther: Jødene og deres løgner
Jødene rundt Bush
En ærlig rabbi forteller om jødenes skyld i egen skjebne
Benjamin Friedman forteller. Intet er som å høre sanheten om jødene fra en jøde

Bilderbergerne på plass i Sverige

Hemlighetsfulla Bilderberggruppen på plats i Sverige

En av världens två mäktigaste beslutscentra, Bilderberggruppen har idag inlett sitt möte i Stenungssund utanför Göteborg, ett par veckor innan deras skyddslingar och adepter träffas på EU-toppmötet i Göteborg.

Det andra mäktigaste beslutscentrat i världen, förutom Bilderberggruppen, är Trilaterala kommissionen.

Nedan följer en intervju med en NATO-insider i internationell politik, greken Anastasios strugas, som i intervjun förklarar den roll Bilderberggruppen spelar i internationell politik och i enskilda länders politiska och ekonomiska liv.

Enligt denne Strugas så är det Bilderberggruppen som utnämner och kontrollerar presidenter och premiärministrar i alla Västländer som ingår i den transatlantiska axeln: USA och västeuropa. Varsågod och läs intervjun nedan om ni orkar!

Den är lärorik!!

Athanasios Strigas has studied Political and Economic Sciences in the University of Heidelberg.
Moreover Foreign Relations and International Strategy in the University of Georgetown in Washington D.C.
and Propaganda in Patris Lumumba of Moschow.He started his career as an assistand and nowadays
as professed consultant of the supereme military commander of NATO.Most of his time he is in Brussels
and the last 1.5 years he has written 4 books which had big success.

_We all know that countries are being guided from its political and military leaderships.Big countries
and small do exist and also the small countries have dependency from the big ones.Despite this in your books
you mention two international decision making centers which in your opinion are above the countries and ideologies.
Could you be more specific at that point?

_It may sound exaggerated but the people in our days are being guided by our political and military leaderships
according to the orders of the two global centers-Trilateral Commision and the renowned Bilderberg Club.
This marks a new status and it is not something that happened in the past,in which the world was ruled by the
ideologies.It is known that the ideologies were being used everytime as a way to control the people.
But the conflicting ideologies were creating also many warfare.
Therefore until some time we had alliances between countries.The last years we have seen a change in the global
scenerey.Everything has been globalised.The world has become a global neighbourhood.
Therefore it urged the necessity for global decision making centers.From this point of view the planetarchy
,if we call it like this,will be the politics of the 21st century.This necessary margins the goverments
of the various countries which are now dependent from those international centers.Today we see that the profits
are now the ones that determine the destinies of the countries.The world is already being ruled by substitutes of
those two centers.The task of the todays goverments is to keep safe the 93% of the international wealth.This means
the wealth that those two centers manage.

_What is exactly the Bilderberg Club and what the Trilateral Commision?

_The Bilderberg Club is an international decision making center which took its name from the hotel
of the Dutch town Oosterberg where its first convention took place in 1954.It does have as headquarters Hague in Holland.
In its conventions we would say that take part the protagonists and the supernumary.The supernumary are something
like visitors-speakers and they are only allowed to speak a few minutes and always in the first day of the convention.
The Guidance Comitee of the Club is consisted by Americans and Europeans from the developed countries ,never
has joined a person from the Thirld World.
The Club is consisted by persons with conservative abberations such as Giovanni Anieli,Luns,Rotschild etc.
The president of the Bilderberg Club is today James Kallahan ex-prime minister of England and his assistant is the
ex-General Secretary of NATO,lord Karington.You must remember that in 1993 the Club has met in Hellas,in "Asteras" hotel
of Bouliagmeni.The Bilderberg Club controls today 33% of the global wealth.
Some members of the Bilderberg Club without having departed from it officialy have established in June of 1973
a more developed part the Trilateral Commision with leader the president of the Chase Manhatan Bank,D.Rockefeller.
From that time the members of the Trilateral Commision do operate parallelaly but somewhat above the Bilderberg Club
as a Center of Research and Analysis.From the founding members of the Trilateral Commision are Sirus Vans and
Wahren Christoffer.President is D.Rockefeller and executive manager is Zbigniew Brzezinski.The Trilateral Commision
manages the 60% of the international wealth.

_From where do those centers have such power?

_It think that it is obvious that they take the power from the international wealth they have in their hands
and from the apointive presidents or prime ministers -which are in the majority technocrats-which they do control and
until some point do guide.

_But how is possible the selection of the proper persons?Are there any persons that accept to be the dependent leaders
of their countries?

_This éæ a resonable question but the human ambition does not have any limits.There exist skillful people that
in order to rise from the rank at the top of their country's leadership do not mind for the means that will
be used and also for the consequences.The selection for the suitable persons to serve the two centers is being
made after checked information which have collected analysts of the NSA with the help of organisations such as CIA,
DIA and DEA.The deductions which have extracted the analysts of the NSA are being transfered in the end to the Guidance
Comitee of the Bilderberg Club.The Comitee does meet secretely and the conclusion is sealed in a special envelope
which is then given to the presidency of the Bilderberg Club and the Trilateral Commision.Almost 99% the
presidencies do approve the decision.The qualifications of the candidates are very fluid,i mean at first elastic
consciousness or if you want plasticity to comply to the international decision making center.Another element
which is being controlled is that they must not disturb the global balance.This must because it has nothing to do
with the balance of the world but from the balance of the profit rates.Virtually they globally prefabricate the income
of the two international centers funds.

_But didn't that happen also in the past?

_In the past if someone was a prime minister or a president would have come to a conflict with the great powers
he would have been characterised as 'troublemaker' and underminer of the liberty and then would have been vanished
politically or biologically.Today the politicians are dependent of some needs which do not allow them to commit any
independent moves.You have seen in the recent Germany elections-which happened together with our counsil
elections-that the French were the ones that were celebrating the victory of Kohl.And this becaused the Mark is
supporting the French franc.There is no more any freedom in the leaders.As you likewiese are propably
obliged to some friends that you have to take into consideration in your moves and plans.

_Could you give as an example?

_Let's make an hypothesis that for example this or the next Greek goverment had the will the Albanian and Turkish problem
and the dispute of Hellas with Skopje for the name Macedonia.What would they do?Just 300 men are enough to invade
into the Aktio base in Preveza which belongs to the NSA and then every problem would be solved.Because if this base
would be occupied every electronic control in the Balkans and Turkey would be paralysed.But such a movement needs
much courage.

_Which are the methods the structure and the groups of the global decision making centers?

_The methods that are being used are simple:i promote you as a president,prime minister,military leader;you satisfy your
vanity and have ethical and economical profits,in returm you have to blindly obey us.If not we destroy you with the
method of corruption or the forced resignation or the assasination.At least this is what happened till now.

_What tendencies do appear those centers today?

_In our days you can see a tendency for renewal.And therefore it was decided in the last Bilderberg meeting to give to the
people 2% percent more from the international wealth,something that the old ones did not accept.There are conflicts
between the groups of the conservative and the more liberals.But i believe the last will in the end dominate.

_The last years humanity watched anxiously the falldown of the Soviet Union.Which dynamics have lead to this falldown and
what is its deepest meaning?

_The falldown of the Soviet Union is a case that started virtually in 1973 from the Trilteral Commision and a part
of the Bilderberg Club.The members who left the Bilderberg Club and formed the Trilateral Commision used the tactics of
shock and have enforced with their will the breakup of the Soviet Union to the Bilderberg.This was made possible because
in the Summer of 1973 ,in the 30 July spefically,the Trilateral Commision was controlling the 60% of the global wealth
with their its bank which is the Wolrd Bank.So it became the dominator of the game.
The meaning of the Soviet Unions falldown is to prove internationally the failure of the Communistic ideology and present
it as a system that is unhuman.Besides this because the population of the earth is growing the extra 2% that will be given
to the people will be granted to the Soviet Union from the mining of their geological wealth.The soviet people must
be educated as a consuming citizen like the western one.In order to control those people many new countries will be created
that will not have constant peace.

_What is the role of the International Monetary Fund?

_The International Monetery Fund is a branch of the World Bank.Today the majority of the countries are obligated to
borrow amounts of money that they cannot get from private capital or from other countries.This necessity occurs either
because the management of the public resources was not successful either because the 5 years plan did fail or because
there is interior turmoil etc.There exist of course also politicians that redeem the sympathy of the people by offering
them temporal material comforts and asking from them the minimum of their possible efforts.They do this ofcourse with
money they take from the national budget that should be normally given to development projects.In any way the point
is that sometimes countries reach to a deadend.
On this occasion the IMF does exploit the circumstances and acts like this:it grants a pre-approval of the loan to
those countries but with its own conditions.This means that you will get the loans from the banks,that all are
controlled by the World Bank,if you take these and these measures which are almost everytime unsociably.This has as
a result turmoil in the society.The goverment are in a phase of delirium.In order to calm down the turmoil even more
money must be given.In this way that do finally get totally controlled from their loaner.
Let's take for example the Greek education system.60% of the Education Ministry outlays are coming from loans of the INF.
So it is not at all odd that from the 150.000 kids only 40.000 do enter the public universities.All the above explain
also why the public works in our country always begin but never end.

_What are the global decision making centers most afraid of?

_One is the soft spot of the global leaders-even if this sounds impossible-and this lies in their constant fear whether
someday the people wake up and demand the wealth that they hold.The same happened in the ex-Soviet Union.The NSA had
information that some persons lead the millions of soviets to a revolution in order to get the deducted of more than
70 years money.They were informed about this movement in time and they prevented it by dismembering the country.

_You mentioned before an enourmous in power organisation,the NSA.

_Yes,exactly.The NSA (National Security Agency) was founded in the 4th November of 1952 by the president Truman and it
has its headquarters at Fort Mead of USA.It has more than 2.000.000 agents and scientists from all over the world.There
is no comitee in the Congreess,not even any laws that control their activities.In reality there is not even an act that
confirms its establishment.There exist only documents to protect her.The security rate is very high and its electronic
equipment is unique in the world and it has the most perfect computer center in the world.Its computers are
gathering and analysing daily all the information from the hundreds of monitoring stations that are on the whole planet
and in this way they oversee the telecommunications of both the friendly and enemy countries.
The Hellenic part of the NSA network is the american base of Aktio.It is equiped with tenths of satellites which are
for example monitoring the movements of the Serbs or of Sadam and in little seconds they inform the headquarters of the
If you ask someone which is the bigggest secret service in the world,he will mention the CIA,DIA or KGB.On purpose
the NSA has cultivated the impressiong for long time that the secret services of USA that do everything are CIA and DIA.

An enormous amount of books and articles have been used to write for these secret services.But for the NSA noone has
ever written something.In reality those services are executive organs of the NSA which from its side is the executive
organ of the two global decision making center that we mentioned before the Bilderberg Club and the Trilateral Commision.

Moreover the NSA is the politicians manufacturer (of presidents and prime ministers) always according to the orders
of the two global centers.It does redeem geniuses from all over the world,it is said that it is the inventer of the
infections of the today world and of many more things that is impossible to hold the simple human mind.

_How can sombebody manufacture politiicans?

_Well to construct or the opposite!There is a commitee of politician manufacturing whose president is David Rockefeller with
vice president Richard Foren whose is the leading consultant of General Electric.

Members of this comitee is Henry Kissinger,Alexander Haig,Toshio Nakamura,Edmond De Rotschild,Giovanni Agnelli,Cyrus Vance,Charles Duncan ex-president of Coca-
Cola and Helmut Schmidt.

The politicians that are going to be presidents or prime ministers are being approved or disapproved
by the above council which meets once a month in the central building of the NSA.

When the candidate person gets approved or
disapproved the brainwash from the Mass Media begins.
Money is being given from the Central Banks to establish a party etc.On
the same time the other secret services take orders so that the plan of the NSA is carried out.

_What do you see in the near future? Will the status remain as it exists or will there be changes in the world?

_I think that the changes will begin from the area of Saudi Arabia,changes that will have an effect on the whole
international scene.

In this occasion the fragile balance of the oil cartels will be altered because 3-4 oil wells
of Aramco's cartel will be bombed.

This will mean a raise in the prices of petroleum products.The cartels for
one or two years will have a problem in their profit rates.
In this occasion Hellas with its oil can play a leading role.

Here we will have a repeat of the Onasis phaenomenon which
came recentrly in public with all its twisted situations.
This time Hellas can play a leading role in Europe because its
economic strength of oil will allow it to be the 3rd power in the European Union.

I mean that England will loose its
oil wells in the Black Sea ,which belong to BP and Shell,at the same time with the coup d'etat in Saudi Arabia.

It is very possible that the geographic borders of Hellas with Turkey,Skopje and Albania will change and also the
borders of Germany and Poland (Oderneisser line).

England will loose Scotland because the Scottish autonomists will be the
ones that will blow its oil wells.From the time IRA has made an agreement with England a pa a part from it will go to the Scottish autonomists. Being under high pressure and aft ------------------------------ Anonymous
Här följer fortsättning på artikeln om Bilderberg
Thu May 24 22:52:58 2001

England will loose Scotland because the Scottish autonomists will be the
ones that will blow its oil wells.From the time IRA has made an agreement with England a part from it will go to the
Scottish autonomists.Being in high pressure and after having passed the economic convulsion which will lead to the global
shock we mentioned before the world's economy will make an opening to China.China ofcourse will ask something for return.
An exchange could be India.What does this mean? It means that it will be allowed to China to invade with an artificial
subterfuge to in India.The Bilderberg Club will supply India and the Trilateral Commision will renew the armour of China.
In this war ,in order to reduce the world's population,the netron's bomb will be used.Something that the general of the
once NATO's Army Alexander Hayge was fighting off and therefore in 29th June of 1979 they tried to assasinate him.If things
happen like this the subsequences will drag along Pakistan and Turkey,which will split up in two pieces,Eastern and Western
part.In this occasion Tansu Ciller will put Turkey in the European Union.
Taking this opportunity i should tell you that within the vast changes that will happen in the near future is a step-up
of the Ecomenical Patriarchate of Konstantinopolis.I mean that it will play a more important role than today.
Already Ciller has ready a draft of law for the turkish parlament if the conditions allow it,according to it the
Patriarchate will become a separated state,something like the Vatican for example.

_Except of exploiting the global wealth where else do target the two global decision centers?Isn't it a little bit
unreasonable to say that a small group of humans does affect and control almost all the countries on earth? How do they
manage not to loose the control from their hands?

_Let's make something clear.Everyone that is in either the Bilderberg Club or in the Trilateral Commision is just representa-
tive of the global cartels.Allied cartels choose some persons to represent them in the above decision making centers.Their
opinion for the international trend they will follow is determinant according to the the cartel they represent.Besides
cartel people the only thing that they understand is profit rates.The people that consist those decision making centers
just bring gold to those cartels.Few exceptions of members such as Rockefeller,Mitshubishi etc. are just bright exceptions
or as it was before in the Trilateral Commision Pol Ostin the boss of Coca-Cola that during all talkings and resolutions was
sleeping !
Therefore the Bilderberg Club and Trilateral Commision propose to the people of the cartels such as Rockefeller,Hunt etc.the
international politics that they will follow.
The second part of your question has this answer.In 1963 the Kennedy's tried to reduce the tension between USA and the
USSR and to stop the war in Vietnam.But the cartels had budgeted that they would collect a large amount of billions of
dollars with the continuation of the investements in armor and the war.John Kennedy knew that they would kill him.He decided
to get sacrificed because of his illness (an old injury in the back bone which caused horrible pains) and believed that
they would stop there.They took out of the hook also Roberty Kennedy that would certainly win the next elections and would
stop the war.Nixon dared to reduce the dispute this means that he did not continue the war till 1978 but did stop him at
1973.Therefore they involved him in the Watergate scandal and they sent him home.So the control and the guidance is in
their hands.
The two global centers except from the 'legal' goverments do have also persons involved in matters that have nothing
to do with politics.They are bankers,shipowners,industrialists and higher state officials.They collect every information
they get and they trasmiit it to the centers.There the resolutions and the proposals follow.After the propasals the
falldown and as a last solution the death.

_How can the humans react to this totalitarianism? What hopes do exist?

_The only thing that the two global centers are afraid is the World's public Opinion.If the citizens of the countries
get informed and realise that they are not governed by their politicians they will maybe learn to react.This reaction
can take many variations.For example if they deny to work for specific circles of interests.Then the pressure is obvious.
They do take it seriously in mind.Then they will take goverments up and down.Bring the army in the sidewalk but if they
make sure that there is no solution the Leading Comitee is directly being resolved which must give new guide lines.It is
obvious that the previous Leading Comitee must resignate immediately and a new one must be elected.

_Are there opponent groups that want the people to wake up?

_There are secret groups which came out from the global decision making centers themselfs.I am paid by the NATO to be against
monopolies against the big bosses themselfs.This luxury does allow the proselytism of other colleagues or people from the
cartels so that they finally get persuaded that instead of having profits 1 trillion dollars a year to have something lower.
But this bare difference can give good to thousands of families.A few such persons do exist and act against those two
global centers.One of them is Openheimer the son,that is at this time in Moscow and lives in the eastern part of the city.
His father lives in the western part.The son Openheimer is against the power structure.He agrees to reduct(very barely
ofcourse) his profit rates.His father doesn't.Let us note here that his father convinced the Bilderberg Club and the
Trilateral Commision to bring down Gorbachev that selled the russian diamonds for 468 dollars the karat.Then he promoted
Yieltsin that does sell them for 69,7 dollars a karat.If the people of Russia does not react they will have to wait for
the Openheimers death because else they will not prosper.

Noen lenker
Thu Jun 7 16:19:22 2001

Rudolf Hess: Es war eindeutig Mord!Rudolf Hess website

No doubt, it was murder! (German and English)

Mit der "Arroganz einer Besatzungsmacht" wurde die abscheuliche Tat hinterher von Großbritannien vertuscht, wurden Beweise vernichtet und Untersuchungen geheimgehalten. All dies wird anschaulich in der "Eingabe an den englischen Standesbeamten" geschildert und mit Beweisen begründet.

Thomas Brookes
(Der Kampf um die Menschenrechte. The struggle for human rights)

Die Walendy-Website
(Infos über die wissenschaftlichen Arbeiten des BRD-Verfolgten Dip. Pol. Udo Walendy)


Jews are a 2% minority, occupy 7% of U.S. Congress, 11% of U.S. Senate and all of the top positions in Bill Clinton’s administration.

VHO Website (Verbotene Bücher, Revisionismus, banned books, revisionism)

Blacks and Jews Informations about Jews, Black slavery and the Black/Jewish relationship. Professor Tony Martin & the Jewish Onslaught!

Ahmed Rami - Radio Islam Die Internetseite über einen der mutigsten Männer unserer Zeit: Ahmed Rami, der Kämpfer für die Souveränität aller Völker. Der Freund des deutschen Volkes. Seine Web-Seite beinhaltet Material in vielen Sprachen. Sein Kampf gilt dem Rassismus - speziell dem jüdisch-fanatischen Rassismus. (Ahmed Rami, fighter for a better world. He is a hero of our modern, degenerate era. He wages cyber war against racism).

Waco Holocaust Electronic Museum

The Jeff Davis Show(English only) The "Jeff Davis Show" is a live television show which began in December 1992. It is the icon for the central Texas liberty movement. The "Jeff Davis Show" is now an independent news network of television, radio, electronic and print media.

The Zündel-Site

Adelaide Institute: Revisionismus aus Australien. Australian revisionist website!

Berlin, Internet-Archiv-Website. Besonders geeignet für Historiker und Forscher, die die Zeit von 1933 bis 1945 von allen Seiten beleuchten wollen. Reichstagsreden, die deutsche Kriegserklärung an die USA, der Kaufman-Plan, Hitler-Dokumente u.v.a. mehr an original Quellenmaterial findet sich in diesem Archiv. Eine Fundgrube für den wissenschaftlichen Forscher. (Historical perls of documents on the Nazi era can be found in this fine internet-archive).

Das Thulenetz Deutscher Widerstand (German Risistance)

Radio Germania Deutsche Radio-Sendungen (German Radio broadcasts)

Der Einzelkämpfer Hoffman aus Idaho kämpft einen bewundernswerten Kampf an der revisionistischen Front. The campaign for radical truth in history from Idaho(englisch).

HRP Historical Review Press

(Revisionist books and literature)

Wilhelm Tell
Die hochinteressante Homepage aus den Schweizer Bergen. Großartige Informationenüber den Holocaust in deutsch! Outstanding material on the holocaust saga!

DIE KOMMENDEN (aktuelle Infos aus deutsch-nationalistischer Sicht - topics from a German nationalistic point of view)

kämpft für eine Sammlung nationaler Kräfte.

Alliance Massachusetts

Americans for
- Announcement: ASD is pleased to announce an important new initiative: a campaign to bring attention and redress to the "German Holocaust," the systematic
murder of millions of German civilians and military prisoners following WWII. One of the greatest crimes in history, for more than fifty years this Holocaust has been ignored and denied. Today, ASD resolves to change all that. Read about it!

Vanguard News Network: No Jews - Just Right

Dette dokumentet forklarer vel i all sin enkelhet hvordan jødene har klart å overleve gjennom årtusnene som et folk, og hvordan de har klart å få så stor inflytelse og makt.
Etter vår mening bekrefter det dokumentet ekteheten av Sions vises Protokoller.



The text below was published in Tel Aviv in 1958, but was not published in the official press in Russia. The text consists of advice to Jews on how to behave in the former USSR in order to achieve Zionist goals. However, this text, with a few minor modifications depending on the particular country, could serve as advice to Zionists on how to behave towards Gentiles in any Gentile country in which Zionists are living. Thus the word "Russians", referring to non-Jewish Russians, in the text below, can be replaced by "English people" (referring to non-Jewish English people) in England, by "French people" (referring to non-Jewish French people) in France, and so on in every country where there is a substantial Jewish presence. Any Gentile who has Jewish acquaintances will find them adopting many of the methods described below as part of their everyday behaviour. This text is undoubtedly very enlightening.

JEWS! Love one another, help one another! Help each other even if you hate each other!

Our strength lies in unity. Unity is the token of our success, and it is our salvation and our prosperity. Many nations perished after becoming dispersed, because they did not have a clear-cut programme of action or a feeling of comradeship. But we, thanks to our feeling of collectivism, have gone on for centuries and have survived while living among other nations. We have remained intact, have multiplied and have grown stronger.

Unity is an objective, but it is also a means of achieving an objective. This is the point. Unity is what must be striven for. Everything else is derivative, and will come automatically.

Help one another, do not be afraid of being regarded as nationalists, and do not be afraid of protectionism. This nationalism of ours is our chief instrument. Our nationalism is international, and that is why it is eternal. The way towards our nationalism is open to Jews of all nationalities, all denominations and all parties. The only true internationalism is that which is tied to the Jews by links of blood. All other forms of internationalism are merely provocation and deceit. Operate on a broader scale in drawing towards yourselves people who are close to you by reason of their birth. Only they can provide you with the living environment desired.


Form your national groups of specialists. Groups of specialists are the Holy of Holies. Such groups decide everything. Today's specialist groups are our tomorrow. Every laboratory, every university department and every institute must become the place where our national groups of specialists are created.

Prepare young Jewish people for the task of continuing the tradition of former generations. Let every generation of Gentiles conflict with our system of defence in depth. Every time the older generation disappears from the scene, it must be replaced by an even more powerful cohort of young Jews who have been given the right training at the proper time and have become strong as a result. To achieve this, our young people must be promoted to positions of leadership as early as possible on the grounds that they are mature and brilliant. Even if this is not yet true, they will mature on the job. HE WHO IS IN POWER IS IN THE RIGHT. We must pass on to our children more than we received from our fathers, and our children, after preserving what they have received and adding to it, will in turn pass it on to their offspring. Continuity from generation to generation is our strength, our stability and our immortality.

The world is cruel, and there is no place in it for philanthropy. Every nation is the creator of its own happiness. It is not our business to worry about Russian national groups of specialists. If they do not think about themselves, why should we think about them? Do not follow the example of the Russians and the Arabs, who live contemplatively, hoping that an off-chance may arise. Do not expect any favours from nature - our task is to take the favours ourselves.

Create your own groups and use these groups to throw out the Gentiles. Remember: all highly paid, influential and profitable jobs are our national income. Remember that every Gentile who has reached our level can occupy a post which might have belonged to each one of us. We create our groups so that goys cannot prevent us from living the way we want to. Let the goys try to create their own groups. They will scarcely succeed in this, and they will fall out with one another before they manage to achieve anything. We shall help them in that.


THE RUSSIANS ARE INCAPABLE OF THINKING DEEPLY, ANALYSING OR ARRIVING AT DEEP GENERALIZATIONS. THEY ARE LIKE PIGS WHO LIVE WITH THEIR SNOUTS BURIED IN THE GROUND, NOT SUSPECTING THAT THERE IS A SKY. They interpret all phenomena in too superficial and specific a way. They do not see facts as a sequence, and do not understand how facts interrelate. They are unable to think, generalize or form abstractions. To them, every event is only an event, however frequently it may occur.

Our ideology is basically opposed to that of the goys. They say: "Less is better." We say: "More is better." They say: "It is better to be poor but healthy than rich and sick." We say: "It is better to be healthy and rich than poor and sick." They say: "To give is as pleasant as to receive." We say: "To give can be pleasant, but to receive is useful as well." They say: "Act in accordance with the law. That is your duty." We say: "Act contrary to the law, and I shall show you my gratitude." They say: "Win the victory or die." Our slogan is: "Win the victory in order to live, but live in order to win the victory." (What is the point of victory if there is no life? One must wait until the bitterness of defeat is over - everything will come to him who can wait.)

All the knowledge and skills that they possess, we possess too. They do not need to know or feel the things which we know and feel. Everything that they have constitutes the limit of what they are capable of. Everything that we have is our means for achieving more. EVERYTHING WHICH THEY HAVE TODAY IS OURS AND IS FOR THEIR TEMPORARY USE. IT IS OUR TASK TO TAKE FROM THEM THE THINGS WHICH GOD HAS BEQUEATHED TO US.

The Russians are obstinate, but they are not persistent enough when it comes to attaining an objective. They are lazy, and that is whey they are always in a hurry. They try to solve all problems at a stroke. They sacrifice small things for the sake of the major, decisive task of winning a victory. But that victory either does not come at all, or else, having won the victory, they are no better off than before. WE PROFESS THE TACTICS OF SMALL VICTORIES, ALTHOUGH WE DO NOT OBJECT TO LARGE VICTORIES. A SMALL VICTORY IS ALSO A VICTORY!

The Russians neither know how to lead, nor how to submit. They are saboteurs by reason of their genetic makeup. The Russians are envious, and they hate their colleagues if the latter rise above the grey masses of the people. Give them the chance to tear to pieces these colleagues who have been promoted, and they will tear him to pieces with pleasure. Jews! Always act as arbitrators, adopt the posture of being peacemakers, defend the "unhappy people" against whom the crowd is up in arms, but only do so to such an extent as to gain a reputation as a good, objective person. With a little self-possession, you will take over the position of the person whom a short while ago you tore to pieces. WHEN TWO RUSSIANS FIGHT ONE ANOTHER, A JEW IS THE WINNER. Set the Russians against one another, arouse in them envy towards one another. Always do this imperceptibly and subtly, operating under a cover of benevolence. Let them fight among themselves. You will always be the arbitrator.


The Russians do not know how to make requests, regarding it as humiliating to do so. But they are in any event poor and humiliated. We say: "Every humiliation is a blessing if it produces an advantage." One can humiliate oneself in order to achieve a goal, and it is possible to humiliate oneself with dignity. NOTHING IS IMMORAL IF IT ASSISTS OUR PEOPLE TO BECOME WELL-ESTABLISHED AND PROSPEROUS. THE END ILLUMINATES THE MEANS.

The Russians are stupid and coarse. They refer to their stupidity and coarseness as honesty, decency and well-principled behaviour. The inability of the Russians to adapt and change their behaviour so as to suit the situation, and their lack of any mental flexibility, are described by Russians as "being true to themselves," as "adherence to principle". Goys are so stupid and coarse that they do not even know how to lie. Again, they call their primitiveness and stupidity honesty and decency, although they are by nature mendacious and dishonest. In ancient times the goys referred to their characteristically primitive behaviour as barbarity, in the Middle Ages they termed it chivalry, and later they called it gentlemanly conduct. They committed suicide out of empty principles. LET THEM CONTINUE TO DO SO!

They are restricted in their possibilities, and for this reason they set limits to everything. But we say: "Man's possibilities are unlimited, because man behaves in accordance with circumstances!"

Always remember the limits which goys set themselves. The thinking of the goys has stagnated within these limits, and they are unable to go beyond them. Therein lies their misfortune and our advantage. Speak and act in a way which their morality and their concepts do not permit. Do things which seem to them to be impossible and incredible. They will not believe that you are capable of words and actions of which they are not capable.

Speak and act in a way which is confident, energetic, aggressive, discouraging and stunning. Produce more noise and oral trumpery, and say more things which are incomprehensible and pseudo-scientific. Create theories, hypotheses, tendencies, schools, practicable and impracticable methods. The more extravagant, the better! Do not be confused because no one needs these theories, or because by tomorrow they will have been forgotten about. A new day, and with it new ideas, will come. It is here that our self-assertion, our superiority, and the power of our spirit, all find expression. Let the goys bear the brunt of the ideas we float. Let them rack their brains looking for any grains of rationality in our ideas, and let them seek and find in our ideas things which are not there. Tomorrow we shall give their primitive brains some new food to chew on.

It does not matter what you say. What matters is how you say it. Your self-confidence will be perceived as conviction, your ambition will be thought to be loftiness of mind, and your manner of preaching and putting people right will be regarded as superiority. TWIST THE BRAINS OF THE GOYS, AND WORK THE GOYS UP INTO A NERVOUS STATE! Place the upstarts and bawlers in a compromising position, and stir up the pride of the crowd against any sceptics. In your discussions and debates, use rhetorical methods which border on the indecent. If anyone doubts what you are saying and objects to it, ask him his surname, where he works and what his job is. This will usually shock and intimidate the goys, and they will retreat. Demand replies, and when you have received them, say over and over again, without analysing the essence of the replies: "It's not like that, it's not like that at all!"

If some know-it-all tries to expose you, the others will not listen to him and will condemn him, because by exposing you he is proving them guilty of stupidity, and the crowd will not forgive this.

If a Russian tries to show his worth and to attract attention to himself, you must create more sound effects at that moment, shuffle your feet, stand up and walk about, make creaking noises with the chairs, laugh, chatter, hum something under your breath, cough and blow your nose, and interrupt him by making speeches, conversing, telling jokes, and the like. Cause the Russians a mass of petty, annoying inconveniences of which they are not immediately aware. Place your things on top of their belongings, tread on their feet, breathe in their faces, and talk in a provocatively loud way. Let them constantly feel your elbow in their side. The Russians cannot endure this for long. To avoid any scandals, they will go away, leaving the place free for you to occupy... They think it is particularly smart to slam the door and walk away. Give them the opportunity to do so! POLITE IMPERTINENCE IS OUR WATCHWORD!


Accuse of antisemitism those who try to expose you. Pin the label of "antisemite" on them, and you will see with what pleasure the other goys will take up this version. On the whole, all Russians are antisemites, but as soon as you pin this label on one Russian, he becomes defenceless, because all the others will throw him to us as a sacrifice and will destroy him with their own hands. And we shall attach the stigma to the next victim.

Play on the soft-heartedness of the Russians. Make yourselves out to be poor and unhappy, arouse compassion and sympathy for yourselves, spread rumours about the eternally suffering nation, about persecution in the past and discrimination today. THE TACTIC OF THE "POOR JEW" HAS BEEN PROVING ITS WORTH FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS! Even if the Russians have less than us, they will nonetheless help us to have more. The Russians like being benefactors and guardians, and every beggar strives to be a benefactor, because that raises his status. The generosity of the Russians increases in the same measure as their ability to put it into effect decreases. Take from them what they can give: a mangy sheep will at least yield a tuft of wool!


Interpret all phenomena in the light of our interests. Every phenomenon must, without fail, be considered from the point of view of the harm or benefit it produces for the Jews!

Inform one another about everything which may harm or benefit us. Information is the Holy of Holies! Money, groups of specialists, and information: these are the three supports upon which our well-being is founded!

It is every Jew's sacred duty and obligation to inform another Jew of what the goys intend to do. You helped me today, I shall help you tomorrow - therein lies our strength.


Our God bequeathed to us the task of ruling the world, and we rule it. Our task is to keep the world in our hands. Keep in your hands the means of propaganda and information: the press, radio, television and cinema. We must penetrate further into the apparatus of Party and State authority. Regarding any question, form a public opinion which takes account of our national interests.

Any trifle can be turned into a problem, and any problem into a trifle. Not one public process must be allowed to drift of its own accord. If it does not benefit us, slow it down, or direct it against our enemies, the goys. We must be at the head of any undertaking, so that we can guide it in the required direction.

Be the leaders in everything, strive always to be the first! Cultivate within yourself the characteristics of leadership. Do this every hour, every minute, even in the trifles of everyday life. Do not give way in anything. Try not to give way even in respect of trifles, whether they be your seat in a bus or train or your place in a queue in a shop.

In any working group, take the power into your own hands and direct the group in our interests. We must carry out the administrative and creative part of the production process. Let the goys provide the preparatory material and technical basis for our creative work. Let them look after the cleanliness of the work rooms and guard the fruits of our labours. Let their position be no higher than that of a porter or cleaner.


It is permissible, by way of an exception, to allow goys of non-Russian extraction to do creative work. Do not allow Russians to do this! We shall always deserve blame if we allow Russians to do such work. And do not be afraid of us gaining a reputation as nationalists: when persons of mixed nationality with an admixture of Jewish blood or, if the worst comes to the worst, representatives of ethnic minorities, are present, this will produce for us an illusion of internationalism. If you have a vacancy, only appoint a Jew to fill it.

If you cannot do this, cancel the post. If you can do neither the one nor the other, appoint an Asian. If none is available, take a Pole, a Ukrainian or, if the worst comes to the worst, a Byelorussian. All these have scores to settle with the Russians. After they have been worked on for a while they will become your allies. They are all only antisemites in their own native lands. In Russia it is more beneficial to them to be internationalists. By these means they will find the necessary area within which they can exist. Make use of these means they adopt.

Do not openly destroy the monuments to the ancient history of Russia, but also do not restore those monuments. Years will pass, and the monuments will collapse of their own accord. And hooligans and "lovers of the past" will take them away little by little, brick by brick. Pretend not to notice this because you are occupied with major tasks of the national economy. A nation without a history is like a child without parents. Such a nation can be moulded into whatever is required. One can impose upon such a nation one's own philosophy and one's own way of thinking.

By this method, whole nations can be inevitably deprived of their particular individuality. First they will lose their history and traditions, and then we shall form them in our own image.


Keep every step taken by influential and forward-looking Russians under a never-slackening control. Do not allow them to go off by themselves and unite. Do not permit any intimate, direct links to develop between them. Any contacts they have must be with us and through us. Therein lies information and influence. Do not permit them to discuss any problems without us being present. Where there are two Russians, there must be at least one Jew. Be omnipresent!

If you do not succeed in blocking the young and forward-looking Russians and in preventing them from expressing themselves, place them under rule. Draw them into your groups, surround them with a strong Jewish milieu, and deprive them of any contacts and acquaintances of which you do not have knowledge. Compel them to marry Jewesses, and only then give them the go-ahead. Do not be afraid: their children will be ours whatever happens. Whoever the bull that leapt on board may belong to, its calf will be ours.

By helping such Russians, you are contributing to the cause of our Jewish community. From that time on their wages will be our national income. They will, for their children's sake, lose their "citizens' rights", their feelings and their minds, and in any case it will not be possible for them to be antisemitic. Cohabitation with a Jewess is one way of attracting talented Russians into our sphere of influence and interest.

Take beautiful, healthy Russian women as your wives. Let them bear us healthy offspring and improve our race. Thus, every forward-looking Russian must be given a Jewish girl friend or boy friend. If every Russian takes at least one Jew away with him, we shall all be all right.

Give bribes and presents to the Russians. Give them cognac and vodka to drink, or, better still, spirits sold under a State monopoly. They will sell anything, including their own Russia, in exchange for trinkets and poison.

A final piece of advice. Be vigilant. The Spanish Inquisition and German fascism must not be repeated. Nip in the bud any attempts to put society in opposition to us, and destroy any anti-Jewish tendencies at the very outset, whatever shape they may take. Fascism is not an accidental phenomenon. It arises in places where we underestimate the local people's efforts to be the owners of their own land. Fascism develops secretly in all nations. Luckily for us, different nations start practising fascism at different times and under different names.


Buy up, steal and destroy any works which reveal our tactics and strategy and which represent the Jews in a poor light. Do not permit such works to be re-published. The goy nations must not remember or know the actual reasons for Jewish pogroms and persecutions. They must only know our interpretation of such questions.

Pay particular attention to recalcitrant, obstinate people who do not want to bow to our superiority, do not want to work for us and are opposed to our practices and our policies. Sooner or later such people will develop into antisemites. Do not allow little antisemites to grow into people who take part in big pogroms. Let them tire themselves out at the very outset with their stubborn idea of national dignity. Expose them, use any pretext and any reason to place them in a compromising position, and oppose them with all the means available. So long as they are alone, they will be unable to hold out against our collectivism and against our onslaught. They may be in the right a thousand times over with their trivialities. But they are in the wrong nonetheless if they stand in our way.

Spread compromising rumours about these obstinate people, give them a dubious reputation, and in the end they will then begin to be feared by those who support them, who know them well and who have a very high opinion of them.


You must deprive them of any links and contacts, and make it impossible for them to work effectively. Cast doubt on whether the work they are doing, and the positions they hold, serve any useful purpose. Isolate them, stir up the crowd against them, deprive them of influential positions in society, and provoke them into conflicts. Humiliate them, ignore them, offend them by giving unfair incentives and imposing unjust penalties, and when they protest, accuse them of being disobedient, insubordinate, quarrelsome and troublesome.

Appeal to the public and to the administrative authorities, drag these obstinate people before the Party Committee and to the police. If possible, take them to court.

If you are older than them, accuse them of breaching the principle of respect for one's elders. If you are the same age as them, accuse them of breaching the principle of brotherhood, and be quite sure to blame them for violating the principle of internationalism. The effectiveness of these methods has been proved over many generations. This is how all so-called "exploiters" act, being impelled by the need to keep the nations in a state of obedience. The chief point is that they must be accused. Let them try to defend themselves. Anyone who tries to defend himself is already half guilty!

If the opportunity arises, move their behaviour into the political arena, write denunciations and anonymous letters about them, accuse them of antisocial behaviour and economic sabotage. Provoke them into publicly opposing State power, and then destroy them with the aid of that same State power.

Only those who submissively follow us and go along with us have the right to privileges and a quiet life. Those who wish to go their own independent way are potentially dangerous and must be deprived of all kinds of support and of the means of existence.


There must either be the order we impose, or there must be complete disorganization. Chaos must reign in any place where goys wish to manage without us! Act so that disorder continues until the exhausted goys, having become desperate, ask us to take power into our own hands and give them a quiet life.

The goys must work under our leadership and be beneficial to us. Those who are of no benefit to us must be expelled. There is no public benefit beyond our interests! Anyone who is not with us is against us! An eye for an eye! A tooth for a tooth! That is what Moses taught, and that is how our forefathers lived. And that is how we shall live too. Revenge is a sacred feeling. It forms a person's character and consolidates his position. Abandon any feeling of submissiveness and humility towards those who have offended us. Let the stupid goys keep for themselves the slogans of Christian charity, meekness, humility and self-denial - they are exactly what the goys are worthy of.

Propagate and implant the Christian "virtues" among the goys, but as for yourselves, you must remain hard and uncompromising at heart. Be uncompromising towards our enemies! If you forgive them a small offence today, they will inflict a big offence on you tomorrow. Do not become accustomed to being offended, and repel other people's desire to cause you offence.


Let the goys urge one another to be cautious, moderate and flexible in relation to us. Let them be cautious in holding back our onslaught. We must act decisively and rapidly, always confronting them with accomplished facts. After this, let them hold long, fruitless discussions. They have no weapon against our methods. Even if, after reaching a tough decision, they do one thing - by the time they have had this idea, reached an agreement and done that one thing, we shall have done ten more important things. Let the resistance they offer be the stimulus we require, and not an obstacle to us. We need their opposition so that we can maintain our fighting spirit and our preparedness, but that is the only purpose for which we need it.

Never relax the pressure. The tougher the resistance of the goys is, the greater our expenditure will be. Our income, and the amounts which we accumulate, will therefore have to increase correspondingly. The profit we are making today must cover any possible losses in future pogroms, which take place in every country from time to time. Let the goys pay today for the fact that they will later, somewhere in the world, take back part of what is theirs.

We must always be ready to leave the anger and hatred of the goys behind and go away to a place where people will accept us because they reckon that the economy can be revived by means of our capital.

Part of our strategy is to switch countries from time to time in search of more favourable living conditions. This is the meaning of the symbol of Agasfer, the "ETERNAL JEW", indefatigable optimist and eternal wanderer.

But if we do have to go away, we must go away healthy and rich, and not poor and sick. Money is our means of transport.

We move our centre of gravity to the place to which our money, our capital, has previously been transferred.

From time to time - after becoming materially stronger in the countries of the diaspora, and after collecting our tribute from them - we assemble in the land of our forefathers to fortify our spirit, our power, our symbols, and our belief in unity.

We assemble in order to disperse again. And so on throughout all the ages.







A volume would have to be written to give a true chronicle of the part played by Jews in the revolution, of the rôle of Jews in the Bolshevik venture, and of their leadership of the Communist Party. Several volumes of "appendices" consisting of documentary data confirming one allegation or another would have to be added to that volume. At the present time it is not in anyone's power, neither is it necessary, to compile such a volume.

We are asked: "What do you not like about us?" I shall permit myself to reply by referring firstly to the neo-antisemites who came into being along with the revolution, and secondly to the eleven years for which Soviet power has been at the helm of government:

We do not like the fact that you played too prominent a part in the revolution which proved to be a very great deceit and falsification.

We do not like the fact that you were the backbone of the Communist Party.

We do not like the fact that you have for many years, by your organization and your tenacious insistence and willpower, consolidated and strengthened the most senseless and bloody enterprise which mankind has ever known since the world was created.

We do not like the fact that this enterprise was conducted in fulfilment of the doctrine of Karl Marx, a Jew.

We do not like the fact that this dreadful business was played out by exerting pressure on the Russians and that it has brought unspeakable losses both to the Russians as a whole and to each Russian individually.

We do not like the fact that you Jews, despite being a comparatively small group in the population of Russia, took an entirely disproportionate part in the vile operations described above.

We do not like the fact that you have in fact become our masters.


We do not like the fact that, having become our masters, you turned out to be rulers who were very far from kind. If one remembers how we behaved towards you when power was in our hands, and if one compares this with how you, the Jews, behave towards us today, the difference is stupendous. Under your power, Russia became a country of dumb slaves; they do not even have the ability to gnaw at their chains. You complained that anti-Jewish pogroms were taking place while "the historical Russian régime" (i.e. the Tsarist régime) ruled the country. These pogroms seem like children's toys when compared with the pogrom against the whole of Russia which has been committed during your eleven years of rule! And you ask what we do not like about you!!!...

V. V. Shulgin

"What We Do Not Like About The Jews"






One of Peter the Great's orders was worded as follows: "I would rather see Mohammedans and heathens in my country than Jews. The latter are cheats and scoundrels. They do not have permission to settle and set up their affairs here. Despite my instructions, they are attempting to accomplish this by bribing my officials."

Yelizaveta Petrovna, the daughter of Peter the Great, issued the following order: "All Jews, both men and women, irrespective of their position or wealth, must immediately go outside the borders of Russia..."

"Along the Course of the Millennia"

Published by "Molodaya gvardiya", Moscow




1. The repatriation of the Jews out of Russia and into other countries must be furthered in accordance with what the Jews freely state to be their intention.

2. Zionism must be acknowledged to be guilty firstly of the criminal seizure of power during the revolution of October 1917, and secondly of the occupation of Russia by the Zionists.

3. Zionism must be acknowledged to be guilty of unleashing the Red Terror, the Civil War and the genocide of the Russian people.

4. Zionism must be acknowledged to be guilty of robbing the Russian people, destroying Russia and reducing the Russians to a state of humiliating poverty by imposing the Zionist yoke.

5. Zionism must be acknowledged to be guilty of creating the Zionist Communist economy, in which a deficit of basic goods is artificially maintained in the interests of Zionist rule, while the inhabitants of Russia are compelled to stand in ignominious queues in empty shops to obtain the most necessary items.

6. Efforts must be made to place Zionism on public trial.

7. The Zionists must be deported out of Russia.

From the Programme of the Russian Party of Russia.

Radio Islam - Ahmed Rami- THE NATURE OF ZIONISM -by Vladimir Stepin.- The Catechism of the Jew in Russia.

What is


By Vladimir Stepin

Published - in Russian - in Moscow, 1993
Translated into English - for Radio Islam - by
Clive Lindhurst.


More information - about Zionism´s Judaism - from (a jew) professor Israel Shahak



Leyba Davidovich Trotsky, whose real name was David Bronstein, said: "We must turn Russia into a desert populated by white negroes upon whom we shall impose a tyranny such as the most terrible Eastern despots never dreamt of. The only difference is that this will be a left-wing tyranny, not a right-wing tyranny. It will be a red tyranny and not a white one.

"We mean the word 'red' literally, because we shall shed such floods of blood as will make all the human losses suffered in the capitalist wars quake and pale by comparison. The biggest bankers across the ocean will work in the closest possible contact with us. If we win the revolution, we shall establish the power of Zionism upon the wreckage of the revolution's funeral, and we shall became a power before which the whole world will sink to its knees. We shall show what real power is. By means of terror and bloodbaths, we shall reduce the Russian intelligentsia to a state of complete stupefaction and idiocy and to an animal existence... At the moment, our young men in their leather jackets, who are the sons of watchmakers from Odessa, Orsha, Gomel and Vinnitsa, know how to hate everything Russian! What pleasure they take in physically destroying the Russian intelligentsia - officers, academics and writers!..."

Taken from the "Memoirs" of Aron Simanovich, a jeweller at the court of the Tsar's Imperial Majesty.

From the newspaper "Russkoye slovo", No. 1.


Zionism! How much meaning there lies within this one word! Pain and hatred, power and craftiness, refinement and cruelty, hope and self-importance, arrogance and contempt, good organization and stability.

What is Zionism? And why does it give rise to such contradictory emotions, depending on whether the person is a Zionist or, because he is subjected to the effects of Zionism, knows what it is like to experience it and thus has some understanding of what it consists of? Let us try to look into these questions.

Let us state at the outset that, in using the term "Zionism", we are referring not merely to the political tendency which officially took shape at the end of the 19th century, but also to the ideology upon which that tendency is based and which existed long before the founders of modern Zionism (Hess in 1862, Pinsker in 1882, Herzl in 1896, Ahad Ha-'Am in 1902, Jabotinsky in 1906) published their views in the press. This ideology has led to Zionism being practised through the centuries and is still menacingly active today. Today there is no end to this activity in sight.

The foundations of Zionism were formulated in ancient times, some three thousand years ago, and they are:

1. The Jews are God's chosen people.

2. All other peoples are merely two-legged animals (goys).

3. The Jews have both the right and the obligation to rule the world.

The second and third points of this three-in-one formula actually follow from the first. The formula, which was the brainchild of an undoubtedly talented politician, was among the foundations of the religion of Judaism (see the book of Deuteronomy in the Old Testament). At that time people understood very well that if one is to lend force to one's intentions, one must express them as religious ideas. And one must also strengthen not only the religion but also its influence on people.

Another reason why this villainous formula is a stroke of genius is that, irrespective of religion, it is a most powerful way of influencing a person who believes that he belongs to the Jewish people. The only point is that if - as has been possible in recent times - he does not believe in religion, then the words "God's chosen people" are replaced by "the people chosen by nature" or simply by "the chosen people". This is because nationalism forms the basis of this formula. And if someone's opinions have not yet become firmly fixed, it is so easy, merely by a little application, to convince him that he is a member of what, in terms of intelligence, talent, audacity, etc., is the best of all nations, and that no other nation is fit to hold a candle to that one nation. In recent times, this task of persuasion has even been accomplished with people whose opinions had previously become firmly fixed in another direction.

We are not going to refute this formula: it is impossible to persuade Zionists to change their views, because this formula was instilled into them in early childhood, and the Gentile nations do not of course agree with the idea that they are two-legged animals, even if they have been led to believe that the Jews are the "chosen" people and have the ability and the right to rule the world. The only people who need a refutation of this formula are those who regard themselves as Jews but are at the same time not convinced Zionists. But we do hope that the observations that follow will be useful to such people too. As we shall show below, there do not appear to be very many such people - however unfortunate that fact may be.

Another point is that the power of this formula lies in that it legitimizes and sanctifies the idea of robbing other nations. Why need we care about two-legged animals? If we are the chosen people and it is our inalienable right, and even our duty, to rule other peoples, then God himself ordered us to grow rich at their expense, as the saying goes. In this way nationalism is placed on a material basis. Rob and rule! Rule and rob! Money and power! From the time the above-mentioned formula begins to operate, this becomes both a means and an end, but it nevertheless also becomes a more important means, a means for attaining the main objective contained in the third item of the formula: the Jews must have, and will have, undivided, absolute power over the whole world. The only point is that the money and the power, but particularly the power, will be achieved soundlessly, without attracting attention, and without occupying the leading rôles until the very end.


It appears fantastic that anyone should have possessed the audacity to originate the plan of achieving, with the use of such a small force, a goal which has so far been achieved by no one, namely power over the world. It seems impossible firstly to calculate the strategy and tactics of the task of achieving this goal, secondly to ensure the steadiness of the movement, and thirdly to preserve the organizational integrity of those striving to accomplish the plan. After all, there were still centuries to come!

Of course, the audacity involved is colossal. But, firstly, although the originator of the plan did not hope to achieve the objective rapidly, he hardly supposed that its accomplishment would be so long delayed. Secondly, the methodical principle used in pursuing the plan is practically unfailing: it consists in operating very imperceptibly and from within. Thirdly, proper consideration was given to organizational questions relating to integrity, loyalty, and the ways and means of carrying on the movement. Fourthly, the three-in-one formula provided the basis for self-development in moving towards the objective. Fifthly, it should be acknowledged that the Jewish people at that time, who were the initial material (for that is how the originator of the plan regarded them), were rather well chosen for this task and, after being suitably worked on, actually proved capable of moving purposefully towards the goal.

Movement towards this objective then began. It brought untold disasters not only to the Jewish people itself, but to all the nations of the world. Every time the Zionists, with their strong hand, reached for the throat of a nation, that nation resisted this and responded with extreme measures. The Jewish people suffered as a result.

This first occurred long ago in Egypt. Moses almost took Egypt captive from within. He and his Zionist assistants exercised an extraordinarily strong influence. But the Pharaoh realized this, saw that the Jews were clearly soon going to seize power and decided to exterminate this nation. Moses' agents reported this to him, and he led the Jews out of Egypt. This time, the matter was concluded by merely exiling them, even though it was ostensibly a voluntary exile. (The formal aspects of this event are described in the Bible. And that description very much resembles the truth. At least, the behaviour of the Zionists and the response they received very much resemble what was to take place more than once in the succeeding centuries.)

The Zionists succeeded in turning their first failure into a success. They were to make this procedure a rule of theirs. Having arrived in Palestine, they slaughtered the nation living there and founded the kingdom of Israel-Judaea. But they did not cease their Zionist expansion, but increased it. From that time on all the neighbouring countries began to feel the effects of Zionist penetration and although, formally speaking, they were free and great powers, they came under the power of the financial capitalism of the Zionists. They were ensnared and suffocated by the strong tentacles of the money octopus, and were permeated by the network of the Zionist secret service, which was pro-Zionist in inclination, and also by the local secret service which the Zionists had captured for themselves. That secret service attained colossal influence in the particular country, and its activities aroused hatred among that country's population, and finally even among its rulers. It was then that pogroms took place.

Egypt was to find the Zionists intolerable once again. It was at that time, in 928 BC, that the Egyptian troops destroyed the country and the kingdom of Israel-Judaea was divided into two: Israel and Judaea. Assyria did the same, destroying the kingdom of Israel in 722 BC, and Babylon destroyed Judaea in 586 BC. Judaea, re-established in 122 BC, was finally destroyed by Rome in the first century AD. The Zionists' attempts to crush the great powers of antiquity were not crowned with success. But not only did they not abandon their goal, but they also found a way of approaching it in a way which, although less rapid, was more consistent, expansive and realistic, and lay in subjecting the "main" country to their will and, through that country, ruling the world. From that time on the whole world became subjected to the plan of expansion and penetration from within. However, the old method of trying to crush an individual country still continued for centuries and, on each occasion, ended in a great massacre of Jews, and frequently in the expulsion of those who survived. This occurred in Italy in 855, in England in 1290, in France under Philip the Fair, in Spain in 1492, and on other occasions, and in the twentieth century it occurred in Germany from 1932-1945 and in Russia from 1937-1938. However, Germany was an isolated phenomenon, because here there had not merely been the usual Zionist penetration from within before the pogroms took place, but the Zionists also faced competition from a new aspirant for world domination, namely German fascism. And each time it was, in the final analysis, the Jewish nation who suffered. But this was of no concern to Zionists. The gold which they had previously managed to extort from the respective countries was the weapon they employed for their further expansion. They had already succeeded in moving it out of the countries in question and putting it by for further use. Revenge was taken on them, but they also had their successes - if the innumerable calamities which they caused to other nations can be described as successes.


The history of the world must be rewritten so as to give account of the guiding, imperious influence which Zionism has had upon countries, peoples and events. Unfortunately, the noiseless work of Zionism has gone largely unnoticed by historians, or rather it appears to have been inevitable that it should go unnoticed, as it is not customary to leave for posterity any documents relating to this matter. If any works containing any hints in that regard did appear, they were promptly removed from circulation (see the section in the text below on how Zionists deal with publications). Zionists have at all times endeavoured to organize situations, or at least to involve themselves in situations, from which they would be able to derive important material benefits. One example of such situations was wars, especially conquests. Apart from carrying out one task or another relating to re-drawing the maps of countries and of nations and shaping the world to move it in a direction favourable to the attainment of the Zionist goal, a quite narrow and specific interest was also being pursued: that of gold. The war booty gained by the conquerors, and the sums in interest derived from financing one measure or another, finally fell to the benefit of the Zionists; at any rate, they always found a way of grabbing a large sum of money for themselves.

Let us point out just a few elements of their work of guidance. Using the method of egging the rulers on, described below, they organized: the "unifying" operations which Philip of Macedonia performed for Greece; the conquests of Alexander the Great; the Huns' campaign against Europe; the defeat of Rome by the Ostrogoths and Vandals (here they were repaying Rome for its annihilation of Judaea); the invasions of Genghis Khan, Bati and Tamerlane; the conquests of Mexico and Peru; etc. Some people take the view that they had a hand in Hitler's conquests, however paradoxical this might appear, and however blasphemous these activities of the Zionists might be towards the Jewish nation. These conquests caused countless disasters and suffering to people. Entire nations disappeared from the face of the earth. Other nations were thrown back by many centuries in their development and became immeasurably weakened. But people's sufferings, and the life and development of nations and cultures, were of no consequence to Zionists. Their plans and activities were determined by gold and by progress towards the Zionist aim of dominating the world.

The Zionists have, in the name of that aim, organized such a great number of other large and small wars, conspiracies, oustings of governments, coups, revolutions, and other large-scale measures. The Zionists owe an immeasurable debt of blood to every nation in the world.


Russia, too, did not escape the attention of the Zionists. The Kaganate, the state which was located on the south-eastern borders of Russia and was ruled by the Khazar tribe, was Jewish in its religious makeup and pursued the usual Zionist policies towards Russia. Russia, following the example previously set by other states in their treatment of Zionists, was finally unable to endure this, and Svyatoslav annihilated the Khazars in 969 AD. But the Zionists remained unpacified and, in 1175, organized a conspiracy which included the killing of Prince Andrey Bogolyubskiy. All the Jews were slaughtered in response to this and the Russian princes, meeting at an assembly, resolved no longer to admit Jews to Russia. There were no more Zionists in Russia until the time of Catherine the Great. To be more precise, there were almost no Zionists, because they managed to penetrate with the aid of Freemasonry, which is in the vanguard of Zionism and is one of its tentacles, and also with the aid of intermarriage, more details on which will be found below. Specifically, some people hold the view that Boris Godunov was a Zionist. Keeping himself in the background as Zionists always do, he noiselessly organized the slaughter of the nobility and seized power as a result.

Once, when the part of the Ukraine on the left bank of the river Dnepr was joined to Russia, the Zionists had a chance of attacking Russia, but the Cossacks slaughtered them to a man. (They later tried to revenge themselves on the Cossacks by issuing the decree of 1919 on the extermination of the Cossacks.) The Polish landowners sold to the Jews the right to make use of their lands with all that they contained by way of humans and animals. The lessees of the land, by paying the landowner the sum laid down in the agreement, extorted from the Ukrainians a considerably larger amount - for themselves. The extent of the oppression was incredible. During the uprising of Bogdan Khmelnitskiy, all the Jews, along with the Poles and Polish Christian priests, were slaughtered in the cruellest fashion. Once again, the Jewish people suffered for the sins of the Zionists.

In 1764, the Polish king Kazimir dissolved the Zionist representative assembly known as the Sejm. For six hundred years prior to this, Poland had served as a refuge for the Jews and given them land and freedom. They even had their own Sejm and their own courts of law. As stated above, Poland allowed the Jews to fleece their subordinates. And what did the Jews pay to Poland in return for this? The Zionists organized the partitionings of Poland. As a result of the three partitionings, in 1772, 1776 and 1796, a considerable part of Poland, and half a million Jews into the bargain, fell to Russia. The law on not allowing Jews into Russia was broken without any prior arrangement. Can Catherine the Great have thought that matters would end in this way when reaching her agreement with the Zionists' envoys on the partitionings of Poland? Taking fright at what she had done, Catherine then restricted the settlement of Jews in Russia to the Pale of Settlement, but with reservations and exceptions. Merchants of the first and second orders, persons with higher education, and certain other categories of Jews, were permitted to live outside the Pale of Settlement, and by applying sufficient cunning it was possible to make fairly extensive use of this. But in 1804 Alexander I gave permission for everyone to have an equal education, thereby evidently hoping to tame the Jewish nation. What little knowledge he had of Zionists!

In the second half of the nineteenth century it became utterly clear that the policy of assimilation had failed. The Jews had not amalgamated with Russia, but had begun to crush her, firstly by making a fortune out of the genocide which, by means of alcohol, was being committed against the Russian, Ukrainian, Byelorussian and other nations, and secondly by seizing control of the finances, the courts of law, the taxation system, trade, industry, the press, education, etc. Then, in 1887, the so-called "percentage rate" was introduced: the number of members of any ethnic group, or denomination as it was called at that time, who entered the institutions of higher education had to be proportionate to the number of members of that ethnic group living in the locality in question. One would think that this procedure prescribed a just uniformity for all nations. But the Zionists howled: "Antisemitism!" (By the way, they often use this word to intimidate their political opponents and stupefy anyone else. We shall refer below to the sources of so-called antisemitism.) They were in any case also very dissatisfied with the State monopoly on vodka. They took three decisions. The first was to go to America and strengthen Zionism there: Zionists had established a fairly firm grip on the United States by the middle of the 19th century. The second was to settle in the Promised Land. After lengthy debates they decided that this would be Palestine, their "historical homeland". The third was, by overthrowing the Russian government and seizing power, to turn Russia herself into a Promised Land for the Jews. All these three paths were to be pursued in parallel. In addition, it was decided to wage a more clearly open struggle than previously: powerful and varied Zionist organizations were to be set up, employing not only their own, but also all the other, ideologies and tendencies. The activity of the already existing organizations, especially the Freemasonic organizations, was to be intensified. The Zionist secret service, and the Zionist influence, were to penetrate the whole world to a still greater degree. In particular, they were to penetrate Russia, in order to prepare for the seizure of power and for subsequent government. The world only actually began to notice Zionism after the "World Zionist Organization" (founded 1897) and a great number of other organizations had been created. There were some 500 such organizations in Russia alone by the time the revolution began. This served to make people think that the ideology and practice of Zionism were also created precisely at that time. But in reality the Zionists had merely come out into the open and were pursuing their activities legally. As we have said, Zionism has been putting its ideology into practice for three thousand years.

Emigration to America received a powerful impetus. A further one and a half million Jews had emigrated there by the end of the century. By 1917, the number of Jews remaining in Russia was six million. The Jews also began to take possession of Palestine. And as for Russia, whole volumes would be required to describe the activities upon which the Zionists were, and still are, engaged in Russia. We shall describe them only briefly.


In carrying out their own decision, the Zionists entered upon the revolutionary movement in Russia on a massive scale. They had taken part in such revolutionary activity before then: the Decembrists' movement in 1825, the Liberal and Democratic movements, the Populist movement, the organization of the Social Democratic groups. Of course, in all this they had been pursuing their own aims of subjecting these movements to the tasks of Zionism.

In 1898, seizing the initiative from the Social Democrats in Russia, the Zionists organized the Russian Social Democratic Workers' Party. It is to be noted that this was done immediately after the World Zionist Organization was created in 1897. Of the nine delegates present at the first conference of the Russian Social Democratic Workers' Party, eight were Zionists: Katz, Mutnik, Tuchapsky, Kremer, Petrusevich, Edelman, Vannovsky and Vigdorchik. They constituted 89% of the conference. The Zionists also created the Socialist Revolutionary party from the remains of the Populist movement, with a Zionist called Gotz playing an important part. They created the Constitutional Democrats' Party, the People's Socialist Party, and others. The principle of Zionism is to use different routes and methods to move towards a single goal. Decentralization, broadness of scope, becoming familiar with any outward appearance they care to adopt, and with any external goals which they zealously pursue, pretending to be entirely serious about what they are doing: all this constitutes the powerful and methodical approach which has for centuries enabled Zionists to subject everything to their will.

It is known that it was not the Bolsheviks who carried out the revolution of February 1917. Kerensky, Guchkov, Chkheidze and others were all Freemasons serving the Zionists. It is thought that Milyukov was the only member of the Provisional Government who was not a Freemason. For further details on Freemasonry, see below. That is to say, the February 1917 revolution was, in the final analysis, carried out by Zionists and for Zionists. The Russian bourgeoisie was used by the Zionists merely as a buffer to soften the impact of the revolution and, as we have already mentioned, the same applies to the Socialist Revolutionaries, the Mensheviks, the Constitutional Democrats and others.

The Zionists played an essential part in the revolution of October 1917. The Party, the State, the public organizations, the People's Commissariats and other departments all had an overwhelmingly large number of Zionists among their top leaders. In summer of 1918, there were, in Petrograd alone, 271 Zionists in the highest echelon of power and only 17 non-Zionists. 265 of these 271 had come with Trotsky from New York. In practical terms, it was Trotsky, and not Lenin, who ruled the country.


The Zionists started on their task of establishing a Promised Land for themselves - in Russia and by using the slaves who inhabited Russia, of course. In this process, Trotsky was in favour of seizing power over the world, of carrying out a "worldwide revolution". This is Trotsky's theory of "permanent revolution". The various ethnic groups inhabiting Russia were to be slain, thus enabling the Zionists to conquer the whole world. A. Zinovyev, Kamenev, Rykov and other Zionists disguising themselves as Bolsheviks were inclined towards the idea of establishing the Promised Land in Russia, and this is the basic difference between the positions adopted by Zinovyev and Trotsky. Contrary to what the pro-Zionist press is now telling us over and over again, the difference between them was by no means merely one of personal ambition.

As stated above, we shall not be describing all the activities of the Zionists in Russia. We shall only dwell on some of them.

The Zionists organized the civil war in Russia. It was beneficial to them because of their aim of slaughtering the cream of the Russian people, who were the gentry. This was to be done by taking away from the nation its possible leaders, the transmitters of its culture, and its strong genetic stock, while at the same time also doing away with the bourgeoisie and the more powerful peasants and, on the other hand, also eliminating the representatives of another life style, namely the best of the workers and peasants. They needed (and here the line taken by Zinovyev predominated) to undermine the strength of the Russian people, in order, subsequently, better to be able to work on those people and turn them into obedient tools and slaves of Zion. But the civil war was beneficial to Trotsky too. He hoped to be at the head of the revolutionary armies and then, after conquering the internal enemy, to throw those armies into battle against the other countries which were the external enemy. He wanted, within those countries, to organize disintegration, sabotage, diversions, coups and revolutions, and to do this with the aid of the Zionists and pro-Zionists in those countries, as well as by making use of the genuine revolutionaries living there. His aim was worldwide revolution: that is, he wished to turn Marx's idea into its opposite, and he wanted Zion to take over the world. This was actually the very reason why the Polish military campaign against Soviet Russia was provoked. If the line taken by Zinovyev had not predominated, the Russian cavalry would have captured Warsaw and utterly destroyed Poland. And then, in accordance with Trotsky's plan, the turn of other countries would have come. The best sons of Russia, that emaciated country, were to lay down their lives in the name of the Zionists' fantastic plans!

During the civil war in Russia, the Zionists also performed another task. Using some units of the Red Army - Trotsky was the chairman of the country's Revolutionary Military Council - they organized the Jewish pogrom in Seversk. The result of this was the "Law on Those Involved in Pogroms" of 27 July 1918. In accordance with this law, a monstrous Zionist terror raged in Russia for ten years: a person accused of antisemitism was, without any argument being allowed, declared to be involved in pogroms and placed against the wall to be shot. Not only anti-Zionists, but the best representatives of the intelligentsia of Russia, could be accused of being antisemitic, and so too could anyone one felt like accusing of it. People saw who was exercising power in Russia and expressed their discontent with it. 90% of the members of the Cheka - the Soviet security organ, 1918-1922 - were Zionists. Apart from the law on those involved in pogroms, the Zionists practised genocide against the ethnic groups inhabiting Russia, and they did so by accusing people of counter-revolutionary activities, sabotage, and so on, irrespective of whether or not the people in question really had conducted such activities. It was standard practice merely to put them against the wall to be shot.

The major operations conducted by the Zionists included setting up a system of prison camps. Skilfully using as a pretext the interests of discipline and orderliness, Trotsky and Dzershinzky organized the concentration camps in 1918. These were a monstrous machinery for exterminating the people of Russia, a machinery of oppression and intimidation, a machinery of undivided power.


In 1937-1938, Stalin made the Zionists feel the brunt of the system which they themselves had created and which had at that time already pulverized a great part of the Russian nation. Frenkel, Firin, Rappoport and others like them were in charge of the prison camps. The vast majority of those who are now said to have been made the victims during the period of the Stalinist repressions were in fact victimized in the pre-Stalin period, that is to say in the first few years after the revolution and civil war. As we have said, the real leadership of the country was in Trotsky's hands at that time. What is more, up until 1937-1938, Russia was ruled by an apparatus in which Zionists had a tremendous preponderance. It was only after that date that the real leadership of the country passed to Stalin and his government apparatus. Everything that had been done in the provinces before then was done in Stalin's name but by no means according to Stalin's method. This applies particularly to the introduction of collective farming. The excessive steps taken in dispossessing the better-off Russian farmers, and the massive repressions against the peasants, were the work of the pro-Zionist State machinery, which was in fact glad of the opportunity to work once again on the genetic stock of the Russian people and cause it to deteriorate.

The pro-Zionist press now severely criticizes Stalin for allegedly working only for the sake of his own power, claiming that it was lust for power that guided him. But this criticism is unfounded. The methods he used were admittedly not the most worthy - he borrowed them from his enemies -, but he worked for the benefit of the Russian people. He defended that people's very life and development. It was really the Zionists who were the enemies of the people. Stalin was defending the lives of the present-day inhabitants of Russia too! This is because the Zionists, after gaining their victory, will only allow pure-blooded Jews to live on Earth. Everyone else is nothing but dust, and dust must be wiped away. We shall be referring to this objective more than once in what follows.

Why did the Zionists allow Stalin in, and why did they not eliminate him at the very outset or at a later date? Because he deceived them! They thought he was one of theirs. Alliluyeva, his second wife, was a Jewess. At the beginning of his career as Secretary General of the Party, Stalin surrounded himself with Jews. Until 1937 it was not obvious that Stalin's chief goal was to liquidate Zionism in the Soviet Union. Even after 1937, Stalin gave the impression of having no claims upon the Zionists: Lazar Moiseyevich Kaganovich, whose very name made him a convenient cover for Stalin against any accusations of antisemitism, was one of Stalin's closest aides and outlived him by many years. Nevertheless, the Zionists outplayed Stalin in this regard, following an age-old practice of theirs: whatever may happen, and however many Jews may be sacrificed, the main point is that at least one Zionist must remain at the very top. He will then be able to revive the Zionist cause. This is what Kaganovich actually did after the death of Stalin, and he had, though very cautiously, already been engaged on this matter during World War Two and the post-war years.

Stalin eliminated Trotsky by making use of Zinovyev and Kamenev, and then eliminated the latter two by making use of Rykov and Bukharin. The way in which Stalin did this is widely known, and we shall not be dwelling on it. Although insidious, it was a customary political method. What is less well known is another matter: the purging of Zionists in the Party and State apparatus began as early as 1929. Secret methods, rather than open measures such as arrest and trial, were employed here. From that time onwards, Stalin found himself in a situation where he might, albeit at a later stage, be declared a political criminal. The methods by which he worked were, as we have said, borrowed from his Zionist opponents: when in Rome, do as the Romans do. Those methods went far beyond the limits of what is done in civilized countries. But he deliberately practised such methods. He saw no possibility of liquidating Zionism by any other means, and this was later to cost him the loss of his reputation. Secret methods of eliminating one's opponents were too costly, but from 1931 onwards they became considerably less expensive: Zionists, pro-Zionists, and those who were caught in the trap of Zionism, began to be proclaimed as members of the opposition and as counter-revolutionaries. Work began on arresting them, giving them a trial for the sake of appearances, and liquidating them. This method is related to the appearance of Beria within Stalin's entourage. Of course, Beria wanted to pursue his own career and his own well-being. But he realized that he could only attain his objectives by assisting Stalin in the latter's chief aims. Beria did this painstakingly, and not, of course, without deriving benefit for himself: he also liquidated many people who simply did not suit him personally. Such a method is of course dishonest and inhumane. But Stalin was compelled to employ it. If he had openly declared that he was kicking out the Zionists, the latter would immediately have accused him of antisemitism and he would have been classed under the same category as Hitler. As we have already said, Hitler, in serving the aim of the fascist ideology, namely the seizure by German National Socialism of power over the world, was striving to destroy Zionism, his most powerful rival, and in this he was using as a pretext his far-fetched theory of the racial inferiority of the Jews. If Stalin had made such a declaration, he would have been removed from power because, as we have noted, the country's leadership at that time consisted predominantly of Zionists: in the Party, the State, the army, the People's Commissariat for Internal Affairs, culture, education, the trade unions, and so on. The situation only changed after the purges of 1937 and 1938. But even then Stalin was unable to state openly that those whom he opposed were of course not counter-revolutionaries, spies, saboteurs, conspirators, or the like, but were Zionists pursuing their methods and objectives, and were quite simply enemies of the people. Despite the falseness of the accusations, the term "enemies of the people" is, however surprising this might appear, true only of Zionists! He was compelled to resort to false accusations in order to rid the peoples of the Soviet Union of a very great danger and save them from their most vicious enemies. But, when faced by Hitler's invasion, he could not announce his struggle against the Zionist Jews, because he would have been proclaimed a racist. Stalin's authority would have been mightily undermined if he had announced publicly that he had been compelled to resort to deceit. He also hoped that the remaining Zionists had understood everything and would continue to serve the country and not work towards the goals of Zion. (Even such a furious battler against Zionism as Stalin did not, even to the very end, understand the Zionists' nature: Zionism is indestructible as long as there are Zionists.) But it seems to us that this was a mistake. After the peoples of the Soviet Union and world public opinion had first been prepared, the whole matter should have been openly announced by way of a preliminary step. Zionism's struggle to attain its goals is a centuries-old process. And the nations of the world must understand the danger of Zionism once and for all. However, it may be that this would nevertheless have been a political mistake just at that time: Hitler waved his anti-Jewish flags too vigorously when going about his task of seizing power over the world. It is also not impossible that Stalin wished to announce the whole truth to the people immediately after completely liquidating Zionism in the Soviet Union. He managed to do neither the one nor the other, but nevertheless undoubtedly dealt Zionism a most powerful blow.

Let us return again to the beginning of the 1930s. In 1932, Stalin was finally able to operate freely: his Jewish wife committed suicide. The possibility cannot though be ruled out that it was not in fact suicide, but was the work of someone else. It was a mistake by the Zionists not to eliminate Stalin at the 17th Party Conference in 1934. They tried to do so, but for some reason they did not bring the matter to its conclusion. Can this have been because Kirov, their new protégé, who himself had a Jewish wife (Markus), refused to oppose Stalin? Beria then organized the elimination of Kirov, without first warning Stalin. Although this was a very dirty business - Kirov, not a bad man, had been murdered -, Stalin nevertheless kept silent: the political advantages of eliminating Kirov were too great. What is more, it is not yet known whether or not Kirov, after Stalin's removal, would have started to bring to its conclusion the business of the struggle against Zionism.

Stalin realized that there was no time to lose. In 1937-38, after thorough preparations, he struck a massive blow against the Zionists. An enormous number of Zionists, pro-Zionists, and persons whom the Zionists had in their clutches and who were working for them, were arrested and repressed, mostly under far-fetched pretexts. But these were the operations of the Soviet system of planning which, by reason of its nature, sometimes produces very negative results. Apart from persons who were really pro-Zionist, a tremendous number of people were also repressed who were very useful to the country and were actively working for it. Certain factors contributed to this. Firstly, the instructions were not clear: who was the enemy? Secondly, both the central and the local authorities wished to achieve distinction. Overfulfilling the government's plans was so fashionable in the Soviet Union, and so too was fulfilling them at any price. Thirdly, Zionism was conducting its direct operations here too. The Zionists understood Stalin's objective and decided, when being removed from their positions of influence, to harm him as much as possible. Every Zionist who had been arrested gave the names of honest people. These were the best, most intelligent and most dedicated people, both Party members and non-Party members. The Zionists alleged that these people had been involved in organizing and carrying out the counter-revolutionary activities, espionage, and other operations, which were being conducted by the Zionists. These people, suffering the physical effects of interrogation - a method of operation introduced by the Zionists in 1918 -, took the guilt upon themselves, in this way signing their own death warrants. It sometimes happened that honest people endured torture, denied being guilty, and were released. Kovpaka Rudnev, the future commissar, is one example.

Today the question is asked how it was possible, on the verge of war with Hitler, for the Soviet government to deal its own army such a crippling and very powerful blow. But imagine what would have happened if this had not been done! The regular, peacetime staff of the army was pro-Zionist throughout. Trotsky, as far back as the time when he was chairman of the Revolutionary Military Committee, took great trouble to make the army pro-Zionist. What is more, once the Zionists have penetrated any system, they always then endeavour to pervade it with their people.

In "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion", which in our view were undoubtedly written by the Zionists in order to conceal their true goals and to demonstrate how wise their rulership would be, it is said that the aim of Zionism is to establish the rule of Zion on earth, with the Zionist ruler having intellectual control over all the nations on earth; there will be slavery, but the slaves will live comparatively well. However, slavery is unreliable. History shows that a slave-owning system is finally destroyed by the slaves themselves.

In 1952, nine prominent Moscow doctors, most of them Jews, poisoned their patients in the Kremlin by order of the American-Jewish United Distribution Committee. In doing this they were working for the benefit of the international Jewish conspiracy. This actually happened, and is by no means the made-up story the pro-Zionist press constantly tells us it was. After the poisoning, countless Jews were arrested over a period of three months. All this ushered in the events of 1953. The special trains stood empty in the environs of Moscow, waiting to take on board the Zionists who were subject to arrest and exile. Everything was ready for the final offensive, when Stalin suffered a stroke. Was this a coincidence? It served the Zionists' purposes too much for that. Did the Zionist god punish Stalin and prevent him from achieving his aims? Such ideas are stories one tells to little children! It seems to us that further researches will uniformly show that the Zionists physically eliminated Stalin. They won that round, and began to develop their success. But this was of course made more difficult by the fact that those at the head of the Party were already fully informed of the Zionists' activities and prevented their expansion as far as possible. Nevertheless, they did not decide to publicize the whole truth about Zionism. Here we are touching upon one of the most important characteristics of the entire way in which Zionism moves towards its goal.


The chief power of Zionism lies in being silent. The main point is that, whatever may happen, the whole truth about Zionism cannot be permitted to become widely known. That would mean the failure of the whole affair. An agreement to keep quiet is reached not only with their own people, but also with the most furious opponent of Zionism: they must keep quiet. Deal the blow, but keep quiet! A strong man is vulnerable because of his strength, and the Zionists say that there is no need to explain anything to people because, so they say, the danger has been eliminated, and you have done the business by using methods which are obviously not clean. The Zionists tell you that your descendants will condemn you for applying such methods, and that you will suffer other disadvantages; a weak person is vulnerable because of his weakness, a greedy person because of his greed, a cowardly person because of his cowardice, and so on. So keep quiet about what you have done! Each time, all this is supported by the necessary actions and means. And these may be of any kind! They have kept silent through the centuries! Of course, some facts do slip through the net, and it is not possible to keep one's eye on everything. There is a fairly rich anti-Zionist literature at present, but it is only partial. It is not complete, and it does not clearly and precisely state the goals of Zionism, but the chief point is that Zionists are most careful to remove and liquidate such literature, never permitting it a wide distribution under any circumstances. Silence and secrecy are the main power of Zionism. They are the reason for its successes, and they are the factor that brings the Zionists victory!

Realizing that for the time being they could only dream of achieving political power in the Soviet Union, they started on their usual siege operations, except that, as is customary with them, it was siege from within. They began disintegrating the economy, the culture, and the unity of ideas, and also began placing their people in widely differing locations and penetrating into the Party, the trade unions, the Communist Youth League, as well as into important - though not yet very highly placed - positions in the administrative and economic apparatus. In particular, they did this with the aid of people who regarded themselves as Jews because the Zionists had dinned that notion into them, while at the same time inculcating Zionist ideas into them. They were in fact only partially Jewish - they were one-half Jewish, or one-quarter, and so on. Formally, according to their passports, they were not regarded as Jews. The Zionists also achieved it by making considerable use of Gentiles who were for one reason or another dependent on Zion because they were married to Jewesses, had been bought, corrupted, won over, had merely realized the power of Zion and the benefit to be derived from serving Zion, or were dependent on it for some similar reason.

In the State system of economic management, the Party, the trade unions, etc., considerable work was done on removing honest and intelligent people who were dedicated to their ideals and replacing them by egoistic, dull-witted, obtuse, incompetent people intent on personal benefits. Of course, this refers not to staff members who were pervaded through and through with Zionism, but to other staff members who were not Zionist. It refers to the staff of long-suffering Mother Russia. Those who nevertheless overcame the Zionist obstacles became corrupted to an increased extent and were given a new outlook. They were bribed in every possible way with benefits and advantages, and were made to become unprincipled. They were drawn into machinations, and then into crimes and so on. Those who did not submit to this new outlook were either driven away or isolated; in any event, it became extremely difficult for them to make any upward progress. In this way, people whom the country needed were not admitted into the Party, and by the same token they could not enter on the path towards leadership: if you were not a Party member you could not rise very high in the Soviet Union. In addition, when any possibility of a replacement arose, a person who precisely suited the Zionists was installed in the post in question. The principle of "the worse they are, the better they are" is an old method of disintegrating a system. In this way the staff of the Party, the administration, the local and national councils of government, the trade unions, and so on, were converted within a fairly short period into what they are today. Now the Zionists howl out louder than anyone else their complaints against the Soviet government apparatus. But it is the very apparatus which they themselves created and are still pampering today.

Zionists achieved particular "successes" with the economy. By organizing the systematic disintegration and looting of the country (the Zionists have sent the gold to those same banks where the booty they have obtained throughout the ages is kept preserved), by acting so as to ensure that they gained a tidy sum from every measure taken, from every piece of building work, every reconstruction project, etc., by causing confusion in affairs of all kinds, by not allowing any order to become established, by suppressing sound ideas and initiatives (it is easier to fish in murky waters), and by preventing invention, rationalization and the introduction of worthwhile undertakings and ideas, and so on and so forth, the Zionists have reduced Russia to its present state. Of course, the general law of privileges for egoists and swindlers, which applies in every hierarchical system, has here operated simultaneously with the activities of the Zionists. It is the law of the natural deterioration of a system whose self-regulation is weak. The Zionists have always endeavoured not to permit the creation of a mechanism capable of establishing self-regulation. If there were such a mechanism, it would be extremely difficult for them to conduct their destructive, predatory operations. Turning over a country and making it capitalist - with Zionists on top, of course - is a different matter and is what they are strenuously striving to achieve at present. We shall refer to this below.

One of the chief reasons why Khrushchov exposed Stalin's personality cult was the desire for nuclear disarmament. This was bound to work for the Zionists' benefit. (The atomic bomb planned by the Zionists was the first to operate in practice, and the thermonuclear bomb, created by Sakharov, a Zionist, also went into action.) Of course, disarmament is a splendid thing. But America - which, as we have said, had become pervaded through and through with Zionism by the middle of the 19th century, and still is today - had to be paid for such a step. Zionists demanded that the Soviet Union should, by way of payment, trample on Stalin, rehabilitate those whom he had repressed, and bring about change in the usages prevalent in the Soviet Union. The excuse of combating a totalitarian régime made it easier for the Zionists to operate. A personality cult is of course an unattractive thing. Contrary to what is thought, Stalin started on this cult neither in order to extol his personality, nor to gratify his lust for power. Rather, he did it to strengthen his position in his struggle against Zionism and because he believed that he needed the cult in order to rule the country effectively, and also that it would give him some further opportunities in his rulership. At that time the country's population was ignorant of politics. Stalin wanted to rule solely by means of a régime of unlimited personal power, based not merely on violence, but also on voluntary hero-worship organized on a mass scale and supported by political campaigning, with ideas being instilled into people's minds. The cult and its consequences had to be actually liquidated, and without causing a stir.


Zionists are very flexible. They are prepared to change horses very rapidly. They will form their ranks anew the moment they feel that their current policy is failing. They will introduce whichever new organizations and designations are convenient, and will change their tack in their policies and tactics as soon as they realize that it is better to act differently. The one point about them that remains unchanged is their movement towards their goal. In the case of Russia, this is movement towards taking complete control of that country. They find that one of the ways of doing this lies in capturing the apparatus of power from within. In the leadership of the parties, trade unions, and any other public organizations, both locally and at a higher level, they replace people who are not convenient to them, or who merely belong to someone else and are not under their command, and install their own people instead. This soundless revolution is carried out on the sly. This will be done even if it means going through a civil war. The sufferings of the Russian people, its almost complete destruction in the melting pot of the civil war, and the devastation of the country, are of no consequence to the Zionists: their goal is the future welfare of the only "God-chosen" people. They are not at all concerned about anyone else. Not the least of their methods lies in causing disunity among young people. Video libraries showing a cult of violence and pornography, the destruction of literature, of the cinema, of music and of culture generally, the pro-Zionist press, the battle against patriotism and statehood, and so on - all this is aimed at ensuring that the future military serviceman, after Zionists have worked on him in the manner required, will, at a time to be determined by them, turn his weapon against his own people and will start fighting for the aims of the Zionists, which he has been led to believe will benefit him personally.

The Zionists are now leading Russia into capitalism, because they did not manage to establish their grip on her by the demagogic use of communist ideas. The particular ideology that they were employing has always been a matter of complete indifference to them. They are ready to adopt any guise and any ideology and modify it for the sake of their aims. And now they need capitalism.

Still, they had evidently clearly understood that capitalism is more beneficial to them: the gold of the world is mostly in their hands, and it is easier for them to take a controlling shareholding in the economic management of the country when production is privately owned than when it is State-owned. Once economic power has been seized, it is easier to take political power. This is the reason for the mass campaign being conducted in favour of capitalism, portraying its benefits. Capitalism undoubtedly has its economic benefits, especially when one considers the colossal demolition which the Zionists carried out in Russia. The fact is that, except for the war years, the whole history of Russia since the October 1917 revolution has consisted firstly of the struggle against Zionism and secondly of the work of destruction which Zionism conducted against Russia, against her economy, her ideology and her culture.

But the pro-capitalism campaign employs every possible way of keeping quiet about the defects of capitalism, which are already operating in Russia with full force: rising crime, racketeering, pornography, drug addiction, prostitution and other "benefits". The Zionists play on the simple feelings of the philistine public, telling them that life is better under capitalism, that there is greater material provision, that there is more opportunity for personal initiative, that there is not the pressure of the one ruling ideology, and so on. They say that it was the communists who reduced the country to its present state. The population are being fooled again. While promising to give benefits to the population, and at the outset actually giving them, the Zionists will ultimately bring matters to the stage where mass prison camps and crematoria, or some other sinister monstrosities, are introduced: their merciless minds will be capable of devising some evil business. Ultimately they will reach the stage where everyone except pure-blooded Jews will be physically destroyed. The present leadership's flirtation with Zionism will produce nothing good.

A different kind of activity is required today. Patriotism, the nation's good sense and strength, and the way in which the nation strives for goodness, justice and constructiveness, must be the foundation here! And the Zionists can go to the devil! There is no need to assist them in their aims. They are strong enough without such assistance. Many people have been undone by hoping to use the Zionists and then outplay them. Zionism is tenacious and difficult to defeat. But it can be defeated, though not by playing into its hands - such a method is doomed from the outset.


The chief weapon for defeating Zionism is publicity. Everyone must be told the truth. Everyone must know, understand, and achieve a proper feeling for, the whole truth about Zionism and Zionists: its aims, history, strategy, tactics, current condition and current struggle. They must understand the danger, the mortal danger. They must understand that Zionism is the enemy of all people, is the enemy of each individual person, and is in fact your enemy too. It is even the enemy of the Jews and the Zionists, and that is no paradox. Everyone must go into battle against it, and conduct a merciless, unyielding fight to the finish, until complete victory over Zionism has been achieved, until mankind has been rid of the threat of Zionism's victory, of the danger of Zionism, of Zionism altogether!

Specifically, everyone who comes upon the present work which he is now reading must make the maximum effort to reproduce it, publish it (preferably in a massive print run), to distribute it in his locality as well as across Russia, and also outside Russia. The author is not worried that he may be regarded as vainglorious. But it is perfectly clear to him that the Zionists will make the maximum effort to liquidate this work and, if that does not succeed, to cast aspersions on it. The more people learn the truth, the more difficult it will be for Zionists to attain their objectives. Every person on earth must know the contents of the present work and, in consequence, know considerably more about Zionism than he did previously. The same applies to the distribution of other anti-Zionist literature and information. It must be done both orally and in writing, by action and financial support, both personally and by organizing others. Spread the truth about Zionism and fight against it with all the means possible! Become united and organized! But do not stop being vigilant, and lose no time! And victory will be ours!

Despite all the defeats and failures which it suffers from time to time, Zionism nevertheless makes progress, gradually gathering the whole world into its hands and completing its gigantic task of entirely taking over the world. What gives it such strength? What are the organizational and tactical principles enabling it always to feel victorious?


We referred at the very outset to the force of the three-in-one formula which is the basis of Zionism. Apart from this, Judaism, which is one of the cruelest of religions and one of the most regimented in its organization, has operated and still is operating very powerfully. Judaism is Zionist through and through, and is constantly regenerating Zionism. If its influence is weaker at present than it was formerly, it is not so much weaker that a non-practising Jew can neglect its chief dogmas.

Education is also of great importance. The three-in-one formula of Zionism is instilled into a Jew from childhood - but not of course in the words we have given. When a Zionist is more or less adult, he realizes those words and finds them out. These ideas are instilled into him indirectly by one means or another, by means of stories, parables, and conversations held with the child, and by organizing his activities. Every person who has been permeated with the Zionist ideology himself carries out this educative work not only as a duty - otherwise he will be severely punished - but also in response to the call of his heart. He is himself convinced of the truth and necessity of the Zionist ideology, because he has previously been won over to it in a good, reliable fashion. The attitude which the people close to the child have towards this matter is of no little importance. Zionism is constantly being regenerated afresh by the education of one generation after another. There are special systems for the education of orthodox Zionists who zealously see to it that the work of education is being performed "correctly" and that there are no omissions in it. Neither adolescents, nor young people, nor adults, give up their educative work. It is guaranteed that every Jew must be a Zionist: that is the ideology and practice of Zionism. This is the reason for the unfortunately well-known notion that every Jew is a Zionist. There is not a grain of antisemitism in this notion. Unfortunately, they do not forgive their own people. It is not only pure-blooded Jews that are not forgiven, but also those who are not pure-blooded, right down to those who are only one-eighth Jewish by blood. Sometimes even those who are one-sixteenth and one-thirty-second Jewish are caught. This may seem unlikely but is unfortunately a fact. It is beneficial to Zionists to have a few more slaves to their idea. This explains where the enormous number of "partial" Jews come from, in whom the Zionists instil the idea that they too are Jews and have been chosen by God - thus converting them into Zionists too. We shall speak of this again below. It is necessary at this point to note the following. We are fighting not against Jews, but Zionists. The Jews as a nation are by no means worse than other nations. Some people, beginning with Lenin, do not acknowledge that the Jews are a nation, basing themselves on Lenin's definition of the nation as being a unity of language, territory and culture. But that is an error. The essence of a nation lies in its unity, even though it may only be relative unity. It is a unity of blood, and it is a realization that the nation is united. The fact that European, Arab, Chinese and other Jews differ materially from one another in respect of culture is of no significance in itself. They are united within these groups by a unity of blood. It is the national idea, in the sense of a person's genetic origin, that benefits Zionists. In addition, this helps people, including anti-Zionists, to distinguish and discover the Zionists, remembering that they do not forgive their own blood. Jewish traits are very characteristic, remain preserved against any background and, after some training, are easily detectable. If the Jews were to renounce Zionism, the attitude of other nations towards the Jews would change abruptly; it is precisely the Zionism of the Jews that gives rise to antisemitism, and not the other way round, as the Zionists falsely and dishonestly claim. Of course, there are exceptions to every rule and there are some non-Zionist Jews to be found, but they are a great rarity, resulting from deviations in the "educational" process. However, the Zionists try by every means possible to drive these Jews into the Zionist fold and, if they do not succeed, they destroy them, turn them into drunkards, isolate them, slight them and reduce them to ruin and suicide, in order to teach others not to behave like that. Such behaviour is logical from a Zionist point of view. If these steps had not been taken, the idea of Zionism would have collapsed centuries ago.


As we have already mentioned, the tactics of operating on the sly play a tremendous part in the "work" of the Zionists. They pursue both their economic and political activities without advertising themselves or making a stir. Gently insinuating themselves into the existing structures, enveloping all and everything, and doing an enormous amount of work beneficial to the attainment of their aims, the Zionists, in large matters as in small, endeavour to do that work as noiselessly and imperceptibly as possible. Of course, business is business, and however quietly they do their work, the result will be visible and will arouse the indignation of others, thus generating a negative attitude towards Jews. People do not understand that it is not really the Jews who are guilty, but their Zionism; however, it should be noted that if everyone can see the results of the work of Zionists in small matters, it is by no means everyone who notices the results of their work in major issues, and it is precisely this which helps the Zionists to make material progress in their expansion.

There are certain properties of Zionists which help them to practise their tactic of operating on the sly. These properties are thought to be congenital, but in reality they have been carefully cultivated by means of education. Some of these properties are: being charming (when they want to), an individual approach to each person, the ability to worm their way into someone's confidence, the ability to win people over, please and flatter them, the ability to be agreeable and interesting, the ability to display warmth and sympathy (insincere for the most part, but very well acted), the ability to be artistic, the ability to adopt any attitude or guise and at the same time to appear to be a well-principled person who adopts a humane attitude which abides by the national traits of the nation among which they happen to be living, and a respect for tradition and for everything which is dear to people's hearts and to general human values. They are able to worm their way into people's trust, and they systematically use this ability for their own advantage. This method is completely unfailing in the hands of Zionists. A Zionist can even deceive one and the same person several times, losing that person's trust by using mean tricks, by acting improperly, by harming him and by other means, and then regaining his trust by charming him.

But they do not merely become agreeable to others. They can be necessary and useful to others, and can help a person - of course, only if they wish to use him for themselves in some way. They can assist him, perform work which he requires, do him a good turn, and even give him important support. They can lighten his work load by taking over some of the business themselves, and they can become his zealous assistants, associates, fellow-strugglers and so on. And how can one do without such useful people? How can one not give them what they are striving for? But the chief aim of the assistance and services they provide is precisely to ensure that these questions arise!

And it is typical of Zionists that they really do possess a number of very valuable traits. They are extremely purposeful, erudite, well-educated and hard-working. However much people may gossip about this, Zionists simply do not like working for other people's objectives, but they toil diligently for their own objectives. Zionism fosters these qualities in them by means of purposeful education. Of course, the educational traditions of the Jewish people as such - they are an intelligent, hard-working people, well organized within themselves - are of no little importance here, irrespective of Zionism. And they must have those properties if they are to attain the aims of Zionism. Nothing can be achieved merely by acting dishonestly and without making a sustained effort! Besides, when it is a matter of their own advantage and the advantage to be obtained in their progress towards their objective, they act decisively and fearlessly. At the same time they behave in a timid and gentle way in their personal lives, but this is much more of an act they put on than a reality: it is an excellent disguise of theirs. The Zionists have in fact cemented their nation into a nation of fighters and workers. But the fight and the work of that nation are aimed at that nation's own advantage and at its goals of taking over the world!

Their unity and their mutual support and assistance are weighty factors. These qualities are positive in themselves, but Zionism utilizes them and carefully enhances them for its own benefit: if there were not this unity, the whole affair would have collapsed long ago. Movement towards such a tremendous goal can only take place if the ranks are united. Of course, this does not mean that they do not have competition and differing opinions and approaches and the like. That is by no means the case. Their internal life seethes with activity. But they always present a united front in opposing the "external enemy", thus assisting their own people to survive, develop and go forwards.

Apart from mere unity, there is also mutual guardianship. This gives support when it is required, but it also carefully looks after the "faithfulness" of the Jews and sees to it that they do not deviate from their common duty or from the common ideology and practice of Zionism. It is a fact that this has been widely and most carefully observed from ancient times to the present day. The Zionists mutually maintain one another in their Zionism.


The fact that they are well informed, and that they give information to one another, is of great importance. They very well know the value of knowledge: precise, up-to-date, practical knowledge, especially on matters which are of vital importance to them. This is why they are careful to keep up with the prevailing state of affairs in economics, politics and psychology, endeavouring not to miss anything of any importance to them. They immediately spread among their own people the information they receive, discussing it and drawing conclusions as to tactics and strategy. The system of secret meeting places is of no little significance: these may be drugstores, larger or smaller shops, restaurants, market stalls, workshops, and so on, as well as, in recent times, the system of what are known as smoking-rooms where information and business affairs are discussed in a seemingly inoffensive way. There are also meetings at conferences, symposia and seminars, and information - either openly or in a pre-agreed way - is spread through the press, radio, television and so on.

Another important point is that the whole system of Zionism is permeated by a very severe discipline. A Jew is positively obliged to be a most faithful Zionist and to work diligently for Zionism. Otherwise things will go very badly for him. If he fails, even in the slightest degree, to fulfil an instruction issued by his elders, he will, immediately and unavoidably, be severely punished. This régime was introduced when Judaism first came on the scene and, as we have noted, Judaism is permeated through and through with Zionism. The régime is maintained to this day and operates on both practising and non-practising Jews. It is obviously beneficial and necessary to the cause of Zionism.

Zionists also conduct very important activities of the following kind: they very carefully shape public opinion regarding both themselves and others, and they form a system of widely held opinions. And the direction in which this is made to run is that it must appear to others that the Jewish people are eternally being undeservedly persecuted. Of course, they do not explain that the cause of those persecutions is Zionism. The Jews are made to appear weak, sickly, unhealthy, timid, but also, it will be admitted, avaricious and cunning - that fact cannot be hidden. They give an impression of being harmless and of not being dangerous, and this is the chief point: Zionism must not come out into the open; it must be imperceptible and appear not to represent any danger.

But where other people are concerned, Zionists work on public opinion by creating either a positive or a negative impression regarding those others, depending on what will be beneficial to Zionism. Rumours are spread which may be either plausible or absurd but are always persistently maintained everywhere and dinned into people by Zionists. Public opinion is formed regarding an event, a system, an organization, a person - in fact, regarding everything -, but it is formed in precisely the way which is required by Zionism and which will give Zionism some temporary or permanent advantage.

Those who are alien to the Zionists are mercilessly rejected and impeded in their development. Such non-Zionists automatically include persons who belong to other nations and are talented, capable, honest, active and strong-minded. The Zionists will very carefully monitor the presence of talented non-Zionists, register them, painstakingly restrict their development, obstruct their progress and re-direct their activities. If any such capable person nonetheless works his way through, the Zionists will use him for themselves as far as possible and will not allow other objectives to derive substantial benefit from his activities. The most widely differing methods are used here, including creating a bad family life for the person, causing him difficulties with housing and with daily life generally, and making things difficult for him in his studies, at work, in his surroundings, in his health, and so on. Zionists so organize matters that the person is prevented from occupying a promising position at work, and from developing his career.


An important method adopted by Zionists is the farming of revenues. One example of such farming, already mentioned, was that practised in the Ukraine until the time of Bogdan Khmelnitskiy. This method operates systematically and very powerfully. Entire branches of industry may be farmed while continuing their regular production, and so too may entire countries. This latter was first done in ancient Egypt. An agreement is reached with the leadership, with the Zionists saying: "We shall take over the temporary ownership of a stipulated part, or of the whole." (That temporary period is often rather protracted.) "And we can have full and free disposal over the whole, especially over people's destinies and lives. In exchange for this, we undertake to give you such and such, either immediately or as matters progress." This is usually done on conditions which appear to be economically beneficial to the leaders of the country, or of the area, town, enterprise or organization, depending on the persons with whom the agreement is concluded. For this purpose, a situation is selected which causes those leaders great difficulties. Frequently, that situation is created by the Zionists in advance. The leaders see the agreement as being an entirely acceptable way of helping them out of the situation. At least, the Zionists make every effort to convince them of this. It is at this point that the robbing of the population and the extortion of the country begin. Zionists traditionally farm the production and sale of wine and spirits in a country, and also the finances of that country. In Russia, the following organizations have been farmed, and are pervaded through and through with Zionism: the finance ministry and other ministries, the economics and planning departments, and the departments of labour and wages at the State-run enterprises, together with all the work of those enterprises, so that that work is an act of robbery against the nation and the State. But apart from this, anything convenient, including the entire country, can be farmed. Russia now seems to be on the verge of having this last-mentioned event happen to it.

Sooner or later, all this ends up very badly for the country in which the farmers of the revenues are operating, although the arrangement has for a while appeared to be producing gains and benefits - and that appearance is usually rather convincing. Anyone who plays such games with Zionists will in the end make his country the loser. It has always been like this throughout history, and if there is still anywhere today where this process has not been completed, it will inevitably be completed, and by using precisely the method stated! The Zionists simply swindle the leaders. If the leaders feel like kings for a day and think that their guardians are giving them temporary positions of power, then that is another matter: their egoism will be satisfied by giving them temporary advantages. Zionists usually rely precisely on such egoism when making their calculations regarding such activity. People must carry out their tasks without recruiting Zionists, however difficult that may be. To enter upon any collaboration with Zionists is an approach which leads to utter loss, however promising the collaboration might appear. The farming of revenues is a very powerful key factor which is systematically employed by Zionists and operates by helping them attain their objectives of enslaving countries and nations from within, and finally of taking complete power over the world.

It should be noted that apart from clear cases in which revenue is farmed, revenues are also handed over so that they can be farmed. This happens if a Zionist is placed at the head of some affair, or if he himself makes his way into that position. An effect analogous to that of the farming of revenues is achieved: after some time, this newly-appeared leader secures for his own purposes the Zionists who are his subordinates, and anything which is under their control is converted into an item of revenue being farmed, with all the consequences described above.

The way in which the Zionists place their people everywhere is one of the most important aspects of their activities. Apart from items which have been farmed, there is also the complete and universal control of everything. All processes are monitored, and people are guided in small as in large matters. As stated, this was done in the past and is still being done now. These well-directed activities give the Zionists considerable assistance as regards not only the attainment of their current material or political objectives, but also their movement towards their overall goal.

Zionists control everything. In particular, they endeavour most carefully to control the press, and indeed the media generally, where all questions which are beneficial to them are concerned. Particular care is paid to not allowing any truthful information about Zionism to be disseminated. Information which in any way illuminates the goals, tasks or tactics of Zionism is removed, and has in the past been removed, from all works which all nations have produced at all times throughout history. It is even better if the release of such information is not allowed in the first place. And any information is and always has been welcomed if it points away from the true goal, displays the problem in a false light, and pulls the wool over people's eyes. Fortunately, as we have already mentioned, there is nonetheless a certain amount of true information at present. If they have carefully erased the literature of previous centuries, they have not yet removed and "corrected" all the present-day literature.

There is an old but powerful method which, if people other than Zionists have used it, then only in cases where they were occupying some territories over a protracted period, in order to make it easier to administer them. This is what is known as intermarriage or, to put it less politely, the system of the lusty lads. It is done as follows: a sympathetic, charming male representative of the nation, one with the gift of the gab, is chosen, and a woman - preferably a beautiful, intelligent and healthy woman - belonging to the other nation is then "tricked". It is then insisted upon that she must bear this representative a child. After being born, the child is registered by the appropriate Zionist service and is subjected to pro-Zionist education as it grows up. All other Zionists, not just the specially selected lusty lads, are encouraged to do this too. Thus it is that half-breeds with non-Jewish surnames appear on the scene (and sometimes both their parents are, legally speaking, Gentiles.) They are Zionists and regard themselves as Jews. Analogously, so-called "Jews" appear who have a proportion of Jewish blood amounting to one quarter, one eighth, one sixteenth, one thirty-second and so on. (It appears that those who have less than an eighth share of Jewish blood are given no special treatment. Any others are, most likely, the natural product of the reproduction of those having less than an eighth share.) In this way power over the country, both genetically and ideologically, is seized from within. An enormous number of "their" people appears but, as we have already said, these are merely dust as far as genuine, pure-blooded Jews are concerned who hold them in contempt and merely use them as work animals, who do though of course have to be fed up to fatten them; animals must be fed. They will be annihilated and wiped out after the Zionists take power over the world. Those with a half share or a quarter share of Jewish blood (mixed proportions, such as three quarters, five eighths, three sixteenths, and so on, are also possible) can of course take comfort from the fact that they will be able to live out their life's span, but they must definitely know and understand that their descendants will disappear from the face of the earth along with the Gentiles; in addition, the conquering work of the Zionists is now approaching its conclusion, and the half Jews, quarter Jews and so on are themselves making intense efforts to bring that conclusion nearer. However things may turn out, those half Jews and quarter Jews will themselves, in a spirit of agreement, walk off into the crematoria by the higher will of their masters. But whatever the attitude of the pure-blooded Zionists may in fact be towards these lackeys of theirs who have a half share or some other proportion of Jewish blood, they make masterly use of them for their purposes: it is precisely through them that the system of global control, of placing their people everywhere, of penetrating everything and subjugating everything, is built up. Incidentally, a particular means by which Zionists conceal their breeding work is by permitting mixed marriages; but the enormous number of people who have only some Jewish blood cannot be explained merely by mixed marriages. The forces of Zionism are very large, and there is an enormous number of Zionists in the world. Their number is twenty to thirty times larger than the number of officially registered Jews, and this figure applies only to blood relations, even though the blood relationship may be only partly Jewish. But how many others work for the Zionists: some do it consciously, some are compulsorily enlisted, bought and persuaded, and they base themselves on the Zionists' power and on the benefit to be derived from serving the Zionists!

Among the most important Zionist activities is that of egging others on. Zionists have systematically used the following method in the past, and still use it today: after approaching some person who is influential in a greater or smaller degree, they direct his activities in the manner required for the objectives of Zionism, and here - depending on the state of the market, on the current and long-term tasks being pursued by the Zionists, on the specific importance and qualities of the person in question, and on the historical circumstances - the direction and scope of his activities vary from small services to Zionism to the organization of major political steps: revolutions, changes in policies, entering upon campaigns of conquest against some countries or other specified by those who are egging on that influential person, and so on. Here, the political leader in question is usually entirely convinced that he is carrying out his own aims and tasks and that he is working in the interests of his own people, and does not guess that he is only acting as a puppet in the Zionists' hands. The greater a leader's ambitious plans are, the easier it is for the Zionists to direct his activities into the channel they require. They palm off on him any ideas, information, theories, facts, opinions, hopes, wishes and preferences, in this way organizing his consciousness and the direction his activities will take. Besides this, they frequently resort to placing direct purchase orders, concluding agreements, granting loans, and financing the leaders, groups and parties, while demanding in exchange that certain actions required by the Zionists be performed.

This method of Zionist operation has played, and still is playing, a tremendous part in the history of mankind over the period in which Zionism has been on the scene, that is to say for the last three thousand years. As we have already said, data exist stating that Zionists played a vital part in some very great conquests, revolutions and coups. Specifically, this applies to the campaigns of conquest conducted by Genghis Khan and Bati. The egging-on method was the most immediate factor here. Where Zionist goals were concerned, it would have been extremely unfavourable if Russia - where, since the second half of the 12th century, no Jews had been allowed to live or even to be present - had experienced a material upswing. Russia had every chance of becoming the strongest power in the world and, what with Russia's natural anti-Zionism, this would have reduced to nothing the possibility of the Zionists' achieving their aim of ruling the whole world. This was why the idea of advancing as far as the very last sea in the west was foisted upon Genghis Khan. Russia was located on the route which that advance would take. Bati, apart from carrying out the orders of the great Genghis Khan (formerly known as Temujin), was also under the influence of the Zionist eggers-on, and continued this Tatar and Mongolian expansion. The Zionists did not in fact want to lead the conquerors as far as the western seas, and they so organized matters that Bati was brought to a halt; of course, Russia greatly weakened Bati by fighting and shedding its own blood, but the direct abandonment of the idea of conquering the western countries was related to diversionary machinations conducted by the Zionists in order to draw Bati into the struggle to ascend the throne of the great Khan of the Mongol empire. The Zionists needed the western countries for their schemes; they were not going to rely seriously on wild nomads in their global politics. In the instance in question, they needed some destructive activity, mainly where Russia was concerned. They also needed gold - the gold which, in the final analysis, will come to rest (and has already come to rest!) in the vaults of the Zionist dealers, the gold which will serve (and is already serving!) the might and the development of Zion. People's suffering and death, the downfall of nations, the destruction of civilizations and cultures - all these are but a trifle when compared with the Zionists' gold and the Zionists' great objectives. Such activities alone have already placed Zion in unrepayable debt to Russia, China, Central Asia, the Caucasus and other nations. And no payment made to Zion is too large where Zion is concerned! The Zionists must renounce their policy of expansion, their policy of taking over the world. If they do not, any measures taken against them, even the most extreme, will be warranted, and will be historically and politically just.

Zionism has conducted, and still is conducting, a great number of similar operations by which it directs the structure of the world, re-draws the maps of countries and nations, replaces régimes, governmental authorities, and ideologies. We have already mentioned some of these operations; future historians will speak of all this in more detail. Zion is persistent and consistent. If it does not perform such work, it cannot reach its objectives.

But apart from the large-scale influences exercised on historical and political events, the Zionists have conducted, and still are conducting, smaller-scale operations relating to directing the lives of countries and nations. They actually play an essential part in every activity - if it is in any way important - which is conducted by the authorities, by economic planners, by persons responsible for culture, education, science and the like. They promote, guide or retard that activity, depending on what will be beneficial to them. Large matters grow up out of small, as the Zionists very well know.

Their campaigning work is especially important. They place their people everywhere. To be more specific, they have two, three or more people, depending on requirements, in each team of workers and each area where there are workers - of course, it is not pure-blooded Zionists that are engaged on this, but those whose share of Zionist blood is one half, one quarter, etc. They also place their people in every office and department where there are engineers or scholars, in every sub-faculty of the educational institutes, universities, etc., in every students' group, in every hospital ward, in every shop and storehouse, in every link of the administrative system (including the army, the security services, the services responsible for public order, etc.) - in a word, everywhere. From the most local structures to the highest, the Zionists are in a position not only to pursue their direct economic, financial, administrative, political, ideological, etc., work for the benefit of Zion, but also to win over their colleagues and associates in the manner required, that is to win them over to the idea of attaining some or other of Zion's economic or political objectives. At times this work of campaigning is destructive (sometimes it is done on the quiet and imperceptibly, sometimes openly), and at other times it is constructive if to construct something is beneficial to Zion in the particular instance. The campaigning may operate to the advantage of the authorities or to their detriment.


One aspect of the centuries-old, and present-day, operations of the Zionists is the undermining and ruining of the culture of other nations, the disintegration of their distinctive national features and of their national unity. A related aspect is their activities directed against the culture of all mankind, against classical, harmonizing art of all kinds. Destruction, dissonance, abstractionism, surrealism and other nastinesses are elevated into a principle. This is then declared to be the last word in culture; those who do not accept it are defamed as being retrogrades, as not understanding modern art, and so forth. The consciousness and psychology of the masses are ruined. This applies both to any particular nation, and to all mankind. The nature of the "cultural activities" of the Zionists lies in depriving all the Gentile nations of their particular national roots, as well of their roots in a general human sense. That is the nature of the Zionists' so-called cosmopolitanism. The current decline of culture and art in Russia is very directly related to the ruinous work of Zionism, and is the direct work of Zionism's hands. In large matters as in small, Zionists are everywhere taking control of the organs of administration of culture, art, education and science, and are performing relevant work in a manner suitable to Zionism. Specifically, the art of a nation, and the roots of a nation's soul, are being perverted, vulgarized and coarsened. This is done shamelessly and effectively. They take their activities to the stage where a Russian, for example, (and unfortunately this is no rarity) will say: "I can't stand Russian songs!" The point is that he has been and still is being served a specially prepared surrogate. The songs which are passed off as the songs of a nation frequently bear no relation to the true art of that nation. They are either minor pieces of work, or imitations, or things which have been specially corrupted and perverted. Moreover, man has for a long time been sustainedly torn away from his national roots. He is to a large extent already denationalized and will consequently better absorb that substitute for culture which is of benefit to Zion because it works on people in the spirit which Zion desires.


The Zionists are united in their plan of organization. They make important use of the powers of the kahal, which is the assembly of the elders of Jewish communes. They have dominant and undivided influence within the kahal, and it is through the kahal that they conduct their organizational, educational, financial, disciplinary and other operations. They work in a united way locally, regionally, across a whole country, and across the entire planet. In this process, they coordinate their activities very precisely, operating in a united front, deploying the necessary manpower and facilities in the place required, and jointly solving one problem or another. Their mutual support and assistance are in fact the mutual assistance which their own troops, military units and fighters provide for one another and which assists in winning battles and moving towards the overall strategic goal.

When necessary, they create a tremendous number of their own organizations. There were some five hundred such organizations in Russia alone during the period of the revolutions of 1917, and there is a colossal number of them in Russia today. These organizations are, on the face of it, sometimes unconnected with one another, but in essence they are merely sections of a single battle front. These organizations are very mobile and all-embracing, and make use of a variety of methods and approaches. But in respect of the objective being aimed at, the strictest unity is retained. Zion must make a substantial gain from the work of those organizations, even if some - and sometimes a very large number - of its people will have to be sacrificed. They are always prepared to substitute one pretext for another, to renounce one organization or another, to introduce another organization, to change the method of attack, to concentrate their efforts or disperse them, to change the direction in which they will deal their blows, to change their course of action altogether, and so on. That is, they are conducting a serious struggle. They are not embarrassed by temporary defeats and failures, however weighty the blows dealt them may be. They are a serious enemy. They hit harder than the Tatars and Mongols. It is very difficult to defeat them: the struggle will not be easy, but it is utterly necessary to defeat them. This is because everyone is threatened with destruction. All the Gentiles are threatened with it. To be more precise, all but the pure-blooded Jews are - as already stated - also threatened with it. Everyone must realize this, draw the appropriate conclusions, unite and actively oppose Zion and its cannibalistic aims and operations.


One of the strengths lies in that they are not at all embarrassed about the means they employ. The directive which states "The end justifies the means!" was used by the Zionists long before the Jesuits. Of course, they have used such means right up to the present day and still are using them. Zionists know no moral standards. And why should they? They regard the Gentiles with whom they "work" as two-legged animals (please remember the three-in-one formula of Zionism!). Zionists employ methods compared with which the activities of the Mafia - i.e. that part of the activities of the Mafia which is not under the control of Zion, even though there are few Mafia activities which are not under Zionist control - may seem like mere child's play. We have already spoken of the destruction of nations and cultures which occurs during the course of military campaigns, and we have said that the Zionists encouraged the war lords into conducting these campaigns.

They also make systematic use of the spread of diseases when this is necessary in order to exert pressure on nations or to "regulate" their numbers. In this process they either reliably protect their own people or else sacrifice them. As stated above, the Jewish people are a matter of profound indifference to Zionists, who are slaves of an idea and take considerable risks. People's sufferings are but a trifle where they are concerned. Zionists give incurable or almost incurable diseases to particular individuals, whether these are the enemies of Zion, their relatives, or merely any capable person who is not a Zionist. They also oppose the elimination of dangerous diseases, such as tuberculosis, cancer and AIDS: they need a scourge with which to lash people. Much can be achieved from people by using the threat of disease or the possibility of curing it. Other, equally "pleasant" methods are also employed. Specifically, they organize wars, famines, major accidents, and the like, whenever this is necessary to enable some Zionist tasks or other to be carried out. Some people hold the view that some recent accidents - Chernobyl, Ufa and others - are the work of Zionist hands, and that the fomenting of conflicts between the nations of the former Soviet Union is their work too. Organizing disasters is beneficial to them, assisting them in their aims; in the case of the former Soviet Union their aim is to shake up the country and thus disintegrate it. (All this may seem very excessive, but such operations are a commonplace occurrence where Zionism and its aims are concerned.)

The medical profession, which is permeated by Zionists to an enormous degree, helps them keep control over people's "health". This is a powerful and proven weapon of Zionism, assisting them to carry out "educational work" on aliens, to remove people who are not welcome to them, to cure those from whom any benefits may be obtained, to keep dangerous people on a tight rein and, of course, to serve their own people by providing yet another tool for uniting the Zionists and giving them mutual support.

Not only the medical profession, but also specialists in other fields, give the Zionists great support in their forward movement. The first reason for this is that the specialists among the Zionists make them necessary and valuable. The second is that, when occupying posts in a particular field, they can draw other Zionists towards them and place them in jobs in that field. The third is that if they are specialists, and are representatives of a whole system of Zionist specialists in a country, they can organize the work in the way required by Zionism. Depending on requirements, they can develop the work, slow it down, sabotage it or destroy it in one field or another, or do so across the whole country. Moreover, after penetrating with their people into the administrative apparatus of a country, they can pursue a policy of speeding matters up, slowing them down, causing them to stagnate, or destroying them. This is done in the name of the increasing disintegration of the country, in the name of Zion's taking over complete power. A nation which has been deceived, and still is being deceived, by the Zionists helps the Zionists to achieve their intentions and will continue to help them. For example, this applies to the credulous, unconcerned Russian people, who are very angry at waiting for such a lengthy period for the good life promised them for so long. They have lost faith in achieving power, and are ready to believe the promises of the pro-Zionist rogues. They are ready for many things, but they do not understand that they will, with their own hands, bring their future destroyers to power!


The Zionists' money is a most important tool of theirs. Money is power - that is a well-known truth. But does everyone know that in the USA, for example, over 70% of the capital belongs to Zionists, and that their capital prevails all over the world? They have been accumulating it for centuries. The gold of all times and nations is amassed in the vaults of their banks. Both in the past and today, the Zionists' finances have not only served the basic function of finance, namely the principle that money brings more money, but have also been employed to make progress towards the goals of Zionism: they have been used to finance one measure or another, to provide loans, to organize conquests, wars and coups, to bribe persons in office, to bribe and finance leaders, groups, parties, to hire armies and bands, to develop trade and industry, to raise matters up or to bring them to destruction - all depending on the tasks being pursued by the Zionists.

In this connection, the corrupting power of money is colossal. A person who has become keen on the idea of accumulating money in order to obtain some benefits or other is already to some extent in the clutches of Zion. By operating with benefits and money, the Zionists can easily make such a person do the things they require: making jobs available, carrying out measures necessary to the Zionists, exerting pressure on unwelcome persons, taking part in financial machinations, and the like. When such a person enters into financial contact with Zion, he quickly understands its strength and bases himself on it. It is not difficult to continue to work on such a person in the spirit required by Zion and turn him into a reliable and obedient tool of Zionism.

Of course, all the power already accumulated by Zionism gives it tremendous strength. They possess not only the entire sum total of the power of their specialist personnel, their administration and their finances, but also all the influence exerted by their people, and all the strength of the organizations they control, as well as of their own organizations. And they are always ready to throw all their power into the battle, either for purposes of prevention or else to make a breakthrough. They can bring it to bear on one or other country, organization or specific person. Of course, the whole of their power is never, or almost never, required. They can sweep from their path anything that impedes them, and they can demolish any hindrance and crush any resistance. The power of Zion is immense. But the chances of defeating Zion are not non-existent. And the stake in the battle is the life of everyone who is not a pure-blooded Jew. The struggle must be waged! And victory is possible! Understanding the question, spreading this understanding everywhere, unity in the struggle, good organization, ensuring that the individual steps taken and the movement as a whole are properly thought out, being active, not delaying matters, determination, courage - these are the features that constitute the path of struggle, the path to victory!


Zion has many arms, and one of them is Freemasonry. Freemasonry practically came into being along with Zionism and is its fellow-traveller. The Freemasons fulfil approximately the same rôle for Zionism as the Jesuits do for Roman Catholicism. The early Freemasons were the builders of the Temple of Solomon. Large numbers of secret Freemasonic lodges have at all times served as a means of fooling people by promising to build a better world, a world of goodness, charity, equality and justice, but in actual fact as a means of enticing people into the nets of Zion, of placing them under Zion's command and, through those people, directing countries and events. There is a distinction between Jewish and Gentile Freemasonic lodges and organizations. The Gentile ones are of course lower in rank, but it is precisely through them that Zion exercises direct control. Influential politicians, public figures, scholars, persons active in literature and art, military men, members of the administrative machinery, and the like, are drawn into the Gentile lodges and organizations, and it is through such people that Zion's decisions are put into effect. Freemasony is strong. But it is still only one of the arms. The head is Zion. Freemasonry must be combated. But the main blow ought to be dealt against Zionism, which controls Freemasonry. At the same time one should bear in mind that, even without Freemasonry, Zion, by using its own strength, has achieved, is achieving and will achieve its own objectives if it is not stopped.


A powerful weapon employed by Zionism is that of accusing anti-Zionists of being antisemitic. But persons who publicly oppose one Jew or another, even if only in business affairs, are also accused of antisemitism. Playing on people's feelings of compassion, sympathy and charity, they accuse a specific person of racism, of misanthropy, of egoistically favouring a particular ethnic group, of chauvinism, and of having a completely inadequate attitude towards the Jews, who are described as "a people who are perpetually hounded, downtrodden, quiet, inoffensive, and undeservingly despised and abused". (See the section above on the system which Zionists employ for spreading opinions about the Jews.) And who would like those around him to think that he is such a monster? Some people genuinely are antisemitic. But antisemitism is in fact generated precisely by Zionism and by the Zionist moods and actions which Jews display. On the other hand the Zionists do not as a rule behave scornfully towards genuine antisemites, who are not to be confused with anti-Zionists. The latter are opposed not to the Jews but to their Zionism. Antisemites are even useful to Zionists. The first reason for this is that they serve the aim of herding the Jews together, of uniting the Jews for purposes of defence and self-preservation. The second reason is that the statements made by antisemites are frequently absurd and their actions are excessively emotional, crude and cruel; and the finger of blame can be pointed at someone by saying: "Look, this person" - referring to an honest, intelligent, active anti-Zionist - "is just like that person!" - referring to someone known to be a foolish and cruel antisemite. Thirdly, the antisemites themselves are fairly harmless when it comes to opposing the objectives of Zionism. At times of disturbance and unrest, they can of course slaughter the Jews of a particular locality, but they will never elevate themselves into struggling against Zionism, because they despise the Jews and consider that the Jews are by no means a powerful force but merely a base, pushy, worthless nation. The Zionists' system of spreading opinions about the Jews has worked effectively on those antisemites. Due to their inability to oppose Zionism, they do not represent an obstacle to Zionism's goals. Where the possible slaughter of Jews - and it sometimes actually takes place - is concerned, Zionists reckon that not all the Jews will be slaughtered, and that those remaining will work all the more actively for Zion for that reason. Zion is said to be the defender and rescuer of those who remain. This "rescuer" includes in its calculations the fact that there will be some slaughters of Jews by antisemites! The Zionists themselves foster the antisemites. We have already said that, apart from this, antisemitism is naturally generated by the Zionism of the Jews. An ordinary person can by no means always rise to a position where he understands the part played by ideology and organization. He sees Jews behaving badly and, without going into a deep analysis of the problem and without separating the Zionism of a Jew from that Jew himself, he begins to consider that the Jews are bad as a nation and he begins to hate Jews. Antisemitism is generated and regenerated by Zionism! And the reverse also applies: antisemitism nurtures Zionism in a hidden way; it helps the Zionists to bring the Jews under the power of Zion.

With rare exceptions, an antisemite cannot elevate his behaviour into anti-Zionism. His hatred of and contempt for the Jews blur his vision. If one disregards the Zionism of the Jews, then the Jews are an extremely deserving nation. They are intelligent, persistent, highly adaptable, well-organized, gifted and sober. They love life and they have an inclination towards unity and collectivism. It is not merely a matter of Zionists suggesting all this to them. The Jews really do possess these abilities. But unfortunately it is precisely the merits of this nation that make Zionism so dangerous. If the Jews were like the antisemites think they are, then Zionism would not in fact constitute such a serious threat to people or, what is more, to mankind as a whole. But Zionism as it is in reality, and basing itself on the merits of the Jewish nation, represents an extremely great danger which can only be averted by persistent, active, powerful, well-organized, consistent and purposeful struggle. Victory or death. That is by no means merely a brash slogan. For the Gentile part of mankind, these words take on an entirely real sense: if you do not defeat Zionism, you will be physically destroyed by the Zionists!


We have described what Zionism amounts to, have briefly described the history of its struggle, have given a partial account of its present state, and have also referred to some of the tactical and methodical devices used in Zionist operations. We have, at least by way of giving a general directive, said something about what people must do to rid themselves of this threat. Very well. But what is to be done with the Zionists themselves and with the Jewish people who are imbued with Zionism? The history and nature of Zionism prove that this task can only be performed on a worldwide scale. Then what is the final situation which must be achieved as a result of anti-Zionist operations? The physical destruction of the Jewish people is not appropriate. At least, mankind will only have the right to resort to that extreme measure if the situation becomes entirely hopeless. (Unfortunately, the Zionists, in moving towards their goal, are bringing mankind closer and closer to the brink of such a situation.) So what ought to be done?

The point is that the Zionists have themselves already indicated the route which the solution of the Jewish question may very easily take. The pity is that the means which they chose in this route proved to be unworthy and that they did not seriously intend to pursue this route to the end. The only reliable method of putting matters in order for literally everyone, both Jews and the entire Gentile population of the Earth, is that the Jews should renounce their aims of taking over the world - in fact, that means that they should renounce Zionism - and that they should be resettled in Israel.

"Mankind has yet to pronounce its final word on this great tribe."
M. Dostoyevskiy.

Krigen på Balkan må ses i lys av Den Nye Verdensorden.

Krigene på Balkan må etter vår mening ses i lys av det vi vet om Den Nye Verdensorden(DNV) og kreftene bak denne. Vi er ikke i tvil om at det var USA, Storbritania og EU som bevisst gikk inn for å lemme sund Jugoslavia fordi landet vegret seg for å innordne seg i DNV. Serberne prøvde å holde landet sammen, derfor ble de bombet i grus, og derfor står Slobodan Milosevic i dag for krigsforbryterdomstolen i Haag. En etnisk ren nasjonalstat av serbere måtte ikke få etablere seg på Balkan. De etnisk rene nasjonalstater skal nå utslettes. Det er derfor vi har dagens flyktninge-, asyl- og familiegjennforeningspolitik. Det er "det fargerike fellesskap" og "Det flerkulturelle samfunn" som nå er både mål og middel. (Alle steder bortsett fra Israel)

Nå er ikke vi i tvil om at Slobodan er en liten skurk av sitt slag, lik alle presidenter på Balkan og i den gamle Østblokken, men noen stor skurk er han knapt. Vi er heller ikke i tvil om at det ble begått krigsforbrytelser på alle sider og av alle parter under balkankrigene. Men det er vår mening at noe er galt når de store skurkene og krigsforbryterne skal dra de små for retten og selv gå fri. Etter vår mening er Haagdomstolen bare et verktøy i hendene på de store Verdensforbryterne. Den er en del av DNV hvor Verdensbankierene bak DNV, og deres medløpere, kan stille sine forskjellige mostandere for retten og dømme dem som "forbrytere mot menneskeheten" og "krenkere av menneskerettighetene".
Det hele er til forveksling likt det "retsoppgjør" vi hadde i Norge etter krigen, da rømligene kom heim på de engelske bajonettene og begynte å fengsle sine politiske motstandere, myrde og drepe så blodet skvatt over murene på Akershus, voldta tyskertøsene i politihuskjellerne, snauklippe rødekorssøstrene, jage de tyske krigsfangene ut i minefeltene...., og alt sammen etter provisoriske anordninger gitt med tilbakevirkende kraft.
Det minner oss også om heksebrenningene og inkvisisjonen.
>br> I Norge burde vi sett på våre egne krigsforbryter først før vi gav oss til Serbia. Noen av dem lever enda.

Vi viser først til en uttalelse av David Rockefeller om Bilderbergerne (som står sentralt i DNV). At David er jøde, Verdensbankier og en av bakmennene i DNV, trenger vi vel knapt minne om?

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years."
He went on to explain:
"It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries."

-attributed to David Rockefeller at the June 1991 Bilderberger meeting in Baden Baden, Germany (a meeting also attended by then-Governor Bill Clinton and by Dan Quayle).

Et annet sitat henter vi fra den amerikanske general Wesley Clark, kommanderende general i NATO's krig på Balkan. Da han ble gjort til gjenstand for nærmere granskning, viste det seg at også han var jøde, selv om han til vanlig fremsto som kristen.

"Let's not forget what the origin of the problem is. There is no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure states. That's a 19th century idea and we are trying to transition into the 21st century, and we are going to do it with multi-ethnic states." [CNN April 24-25, 1999.]

Så en liten artikkel om hvordan krigsforbryterdomstolen i Haag kom i stand.
Vi bør nok ha i minne at en domstol skal være uavhengig, ikke verktøy for noen, og at den skal dømme etter retferdige lover som gjelder for alle.
Om Madeline Albright kan det sies at det var en stor overraskelse da hun som tilsynelatende kristen ble valgt til utenriksminister i Clinton-administrasjonen. Det vanlige har jo i alle år vært å sette jøder til slikt. Men da dama ble gransket, viste det seg at hun nok var jøde god nok hun også. Foreldrene hennes hadde etter utreisen fra Chekoslovakia konvertert for å gjøre seg usynlige i det nye landet. Men kontakten med De utvalgte hadde nok hele tiden virket upåklagelig.

The Love Song of Arbour and Albright

International Committee to Defend Slobodan Milosevic www.icdsm.org

The URL for this article is: http://www.icdsm.org/more/lovie.htm

Subscribe to the ICDSM email list at http://www.icdsm.org/maillist.htm Receive no more than one article per day.

Click here to send the link to this article to a friend.

How Madeline Albright Ordered The Hague 'Tribunal' To Indict Milosevic...
by Jared Israel
[Posted 30 January 2002]

Due to the stand taken by Slobodan Milosevic, everyone is asking: is the Hague 'Tribunal' a legitimate court? If it is not, if it is in fact a sham, then it must be an instrument of NATO/Imperial rule; there is no third alternative. And if it is an instrument of Imperial rule, used to demonize and punish those who, coming from materially poor countries, nevertheless dare to resist U.S. control, then citizens of the NATO countries must act against it. Otherwise, shall we not share a shameful responsibility? (1)

Below are excerpts from a press conference held April 30, 1999. Louise Arbour, then Chief Prosecutor of the ICTY (The Hague 'Tribunal') and Madeline Albright, then U.S. Secretary of State, called it jointly.

At the time, the United States and other NATO countries had spent five weeks perpetrating the worst crime under international law: waging aggressive war.

Moreover the United States and its allies:

* Bombed civilian facilities (a war crime), including with anti-personnel weapons (a war crime); (2)

* Bombed a train and at least one refugee column (both war crimes)

* Bombed Serbian TV (a war crime)

* And deliberately created an environmental catastrophe by bombing chemical facilities in Pancevo (a war crime). (3)

In the press conference, Arbour made no reference to these publicly known war crimes. Instead she accepted as her only field of concern NATO's accusations against Yugoslavia. These accusations, which have been over and over exposed as being without foundation, and even lies, were used to justify the crime of bombing Yugoslavia. (4)

B) In this highly visible forum, Albright instructed Arbour to indict President Milosevic.

[Start quote from Albright] "Well, obviously, the question of what is going to happen to Mr. Milosevic is a subject that is very much on our minds, and Justice Arbour knows what we have said both publicly and privately; that she and the Tribunal need to follow out the trail of evidence to its conclusion. We, as I said, are supportive of her efforts." [End quote from Albright]

Instead of rejecting what would be a gross and humiliating interference if the 'Tribunal' were a real court, Arbour coyly (and shamelessly) linked the execution of said indictment with increased funding and help in gathering (or, one should say, fabricating) evidence:

[Start quote from Arbour] "We are here, and elsewhere, to ensure that we get the assistance to move the cases forward in that direction. Whether it points to any particular individual, I think the law is very clear: there is no immunity before our Tribunal for heads of state. There's no immunity, essentially, for any individual, both in a personal or a command responsibility position. All our discussions take place in that framework."[End quote from Arbour]

C) The crucial question to ask about any would-be judicial system is this: is it independent? That is why Justice is pictured wearing a blindfold. At the end of the excerpts is a special section featuring Arbour's references to NATO countries as her 'partners.'

Hmmm. It occurs to me that if you just add one little 'e' to 'sham' it gives you 'shame.'



Press Conference Excerpts

Great Seal Secretary of State Madeleine K. Albright and
Justice Louise Arbour, International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia
Joint Press Conference
Washington, D.C., April 30, 1999
As released by the Office of the Spokesman
U.S. Department of State

Blue Bar

Secretary of State Madeleine K. Albright and
Justice Louise Arbour, International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia
Joint Press Conference
Washington, D.C., April 30, 1999
As released by the Office of the Spokesman
U.S. Department of State http://secretary.state.gov/www/statements/1999/990430a.html

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: Justice Arbour and I today discussed how the United States can provide more information to the Tribunal, and how to speed up delivery of potential evidence to The Hague. I assured her that we are asking Congress for additional resources for the Tribunal to meet new demands for investigations in Kosovo. And we discussed other needs of her investigations, which I am not going to get into, but which I assure you that the United States will do everything we possibly can to meet.

We are also thinking ahead to the Tribunal's needs after the fighting stops. We have consulted with Justice Arbour and begun planning for how we could facilitate access by Tribunal investigators to crime scenes in Kosovo.

The Tribunal now needs real-time support for its Kosovo investigations, and the United States is determined to give it. The world needs to know exactly what is happening there, and we are committed to helping discover it. Milosevic's victims, and those everywhere who love justice, need to know that there will be no impunity for those who commit these heinous offenses. And we're committed to helping the Tribunal ensure that those responsible are held accountable.

Justice Arbour.

JUSTICE ARBOUR: Thank you. I don't have a statement. I think I'd rather turn to your questions, except to say that I've had very fruitful discussions. We had announced a few weeks ago that we now need unprecedented assistance, in order to respond to the kinds of allegations that are coming out of Kosovo in a time frame that will make our work relevant. The discussions I've had in Germany, in the United Kingdom, here, and that I hope to have in France next week, are very much a part of our effort to obtain this kind of assistance. I'm happy to say that the support that is promised to us is starting to materialize, and I hope that it will permit us to face this massive flow of information and organize it in a coherent fashion that will allow us to discharge our mandate in a real-time environment.

QUESTION: Did you discuss an indictment of Slobodan Milosevic, and did you discuss reports that Justice Arbour is planning to leave this position; and what is the US view of that?

SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: Well, obviously, the question of what is going to happen to Mr. Milosevic is a subject that is very much on our minds, and Justice Arbour knows what we have said both publicly and privately; that she and the Tribunal need to follow out the trail of evidence to its conclusion. We, as I said, are supportive of her efforts.

She and I did not personally discuss the subject of -- it is my understanding. We talked about the challenge of the position. I was there when she was chosen as prosecutor, and I made very clear to her our tremendous support for the work that she has done and will continue to do. She is a great public servant, and someone that the international community has the highest respect for.

JUSTICE ARBOUR: ...We are here, and elsewhere, to ensure that we get the assistance to move the cases forward in that direction. Whether it points to any particular individual, I think the law is very clear: there is no immunity before our Tribunal for heads of state. There's no immunity, essentially, for any individual, both in a personal or a command responsibility position. All our discussions take place in that framework.

[Arbour used the word "partners" several times in the press conference. Following are some choice:


1 - Arbour: "We have long-standing relationships with [NATO] information providers. We are now looking at trying to accelerate the flow of that kind of information and the quality of the product. Of course, we're doing so at a time where that the collection capacity of all these potential providers is taxed by the need for them to collect information relevant to their efforts in the region.

"So we are, of course, competing with other interests at a time when we're trying to get access for information for our purposes. It's a dialogue and a partnership that we have to maintain."

2- Arbour: "I can assure you that one of the main subjects of discussion that I raised -- not only here but in all the capitals that I visited recently -- is the need for an immediate, very robust arrest initiative in Bosnia.... I believe that what will ...have a very immediate impact -- would be the demonstration that we have the capacity to investigate and we have partners who have the political will and the operational skills to execute arrest warrants even in hostile environments."

3 - Arbour: "There's no question that we would like to access the largest number of pieces [of information] and to have the capacity to process this information. As I said, I think we've now put in place mechanisms that allow us, in partnership with many others who are in the field in Albania and in Macedonia, to try to process refugee accounts and, from our point of view, select those who will provide the best base for a court case that will be reflective of the magnitude of what has transpired."

Further Reading:

1) "Reichstag Fire Trial, the Sequel," by Jared Israel. Slobodan Milosevic's first appearance at The Hague 'Tribunal.' Can be read at http://emperors-clothes.com/milo/point1.htm

2) 'Message from a cluster bomb,' by Norman Solomon can be read at http://emperors-clothes.com/interactive/l-i.htm#a

3) 'NATO Willfully Triggered Environmental Catastrophe In Yugoslavia,' by Michel Chossudovsky can be read at http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/chuss/willful.htm

4) 'Why Albanians Fled Kosovo During NATO Bombing,' an interview with Kosovo archivist Cedomir Prlincevic, can be read at http://emperors-clothes.com/interviews/keys.htm

5) 'SZAMUELY'S LIST, PART 1 - 22 Reasons Why I Don't Want to be Imprisoned by the Hague Tribunal' http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/szamuely/szam.htm

6) 'Back to the Dark Ages?' by Jared Israel at http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/bac.htm

7) 'Learning from the Inquisition,' by Prof. Kosta Cavoski at http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/cavoski/c-4.htm


Subscribe to the ICDSM email list at http://www.icdsm.org/maillist.htm Receive several articles per week .

Click here to send the link to this article to a friend.



Så en liten notis vi sakset fra Dagbladet; Nyheten ble ikke slått videre stort opp!
Ariel Sharon er jo som vi vet en av tidens store krigsforbrytere, nå statsminister i Israel.(Det samme kan vel trolig også sies om de fleste andre statsministrene i Israel) Det var han som sto bak masakrene i de palestinske flyktningeleirene i Libanon.

Altså: Ariel kan ikke stilles for krigsrett siden han er minister! Men Slobodan som bare var president i Serbia, han kunne stilles for retten.

Ja ja, men vi vet jo at det skal være en viss forskjell på kong Salomo og Jørgen hattemaker.

Vi finner det riktig å sitere Ariel Sharon for å gi hans syn på saken:

Dette skrek Ariel Sharon til Peres 3 oktober. "Every time we do something you tell me the Americans will do this and do that. I want to tell you something very clear; don't worry about American pressure on Israel, because we, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it."

Vi er av den formening at Ariel har rett. og for å begrunne vårt syn hitsetter vi litt statistikk:

Jews are a 2% minority, occupy 7% of U.S. Congress, 11% of U.S. Senate and
all of the top positions in Bill Clinton’s administration. -----------------------------

Var Martin Luther et klokt og forstandig menneske?

Uten tvil. Han så løgnene til pavekirken og nødvendigheten av å rive menneskene løs fra den pavelige antikrist. Uten Luther ville det europeiske menneske ha befunnet seg på samme åndelige og materielle nivå som muslimene befinner seg i dag. Luthers frigjøring fra pavekirken var på mange måter en forutsetning for den vitenskapelige revolusjon i moderne tid.
Han var en meget klok mann.

Derfor bør man lytte nøye til hva han sier om jødene, judaismen og talmudismen. Særlig burde dette være obligatorisk lesning for kristne lutheranere.

Luthers synspunkter turde kanskje også være av interesse i lys av de siste tiders begivenheter i "det hellige land" hvor "Guds utvalgte folk" blir anklaget for folkemord og kriksforbrytelser.

Jøderne og deres løgne

Jøderne og deres løgne

af Martin Luther


Oversat fra tysk af

Olga Eggers

l. udgave udsendt på

Nordiske Kvinders Forlag

København, 1938

Denne lille Bog, »Jøderne og deres Løgne« af Dr. Martin Luther, har ikke været optrykt i Tyskland i mange Aar og er ikke tidligere oversat til Dansk. Hvorfor den ikke er medtaget i de nyere tyske Oplag af Luthers Skrifter skyldes naturligt nok den Indflydelse, som jøderne, denne »9. Stormagt«, indtil for nylig havde i Tyskland og den Dag i Dag har over de fleste hvide Nationers baade materielle og aandelige Liv.

Imidlertid er der ingen Tvivl om, at netop denne Bog har sin Mission, og at man uden at kende den mangler noget i Forstaaelsen af Luthers livssyn og hele Arbejde. Da jeg for nogle Måneder siden udgav et lille Flyveblad med Citater fra Johannes Evangelium samt fra »Jøderne og deres Løgne«, var jøderne og deres Haandlangere straks paa Færde og benyttede den jøderne altid hørige og lydige Radio til et Foredrag, der nærmest gik ud paa at stemple Luther som ikke rigtig klog. Nu turde en saa forbløffende Karakteristik, der er lige saa dum som fræk, gøre den modsatte Virkning og Overbevise Lytterne om hele Foredragets mere end tvivlsomme Værd. Forøvrigt rnaatte det vel ogsaa falde den lutherske Kirkes Tilhængere for Brystet, at den danske Radio for at tækkes nogle hebræere, ikke undsaa sig for at lade sig bruge som Redskab til Besmittelse af en Mands Eftermæle, endda en af de største Aandskæmpere, Verden har set.

Naar der i Foredraget anførtes, at Luther selv undertiden skal have sagt god for jøderne, saa er dette for saa vidt rigtigt, som han selv indrømmer, at han - lige som Millioner andre Arier - ikke altid har kendt Sandheden om dette vandrende, asiatiske Folk. Til den Overbevisning, der saa utvetydigt udtrykkes i »Jøderne og deres Løgne« samt i hans Bog: »Vom Schem Hamphoras: Und vom Geschlecht Christi. Matth. I. Wittenberg MDXLIII« er Luther kommen gennem omhyggelig Granskning af Jødernes Religion, Væsen og Sæder. Det Slør, de selv med saa megen snedig Grundighed indhyller deres Lære, Planer og Forhold i, er det vanskeligt for det umistænksomme, germanske Sind at gennemtrænge. Betegnende er det ogsaa for Forholdene i Danmark, at det bevidst vanskeliggøres for Folket at skaffe sig Klarhed. Der gives Fængselsstraf for blot at citere nogle af den jødiske Religions læresætninger, skønt den i København bosiddende Overrabbiner Dr. Friedinger i sin i Efteraaret 1937 ud komne »Lærebog i den jødiske Religion« selv fastslaar, at Talmud den Dag i Dag danner Grundlaget for jødernes religiøse liv. Saa man maa vel nok undres en Smule over, at alene Anførelsen af nogle Talmudord er nok til at bringe Dom og Straf ned over danske Mennesker! Aldrig er saa vidt mig bekendt nogen bleven straffet for at have citeret den kristne Religions Lærdomme. Men dette er et ypperligt Bevis paa baade, at jøden ikke ønsker sit Værtsfolk gjort bekendt med sine Livs- og Leveregler, og paa den skandaløse Magt, som de Styrende i landet har givet nogle paatrængende Fremmede over og til Ulykke for Landets egne Børn.

Jeg har i den danske Oversættelse bestræbt mig for at holde mig saa nær som muligt op ad Luthers eget magtfulde, ejendommelige Sprog, idet jeg dog enkelte Steder har forkortet en Smule og omskrevet enkelte Sætninger for at lette Forstaaelsen af den for Nutidsmennesker noget vanskelige Sprogform. Og er herved bleven bistaaet paa det Bedste af venlige i Gammeltysk hjemmekendte Venner.

Oversættelsen foretaget efter Hans Ludolf Parisius' 7.Udgave 1936.

Graasten, i August 1938.

Olga Eggers.


til Dr. Martin Luthers Bog: »Jøderne og deres Løgne«.

Udgivet 1542.

Vel havde jeg foresat mig hverken at skrive om jøderne eller mod Jøderne. Men da jeg har erfaret, at dette landflygtige, uhelbredelige Folk ikke ophører med at lokke os, de Kristne, til sig, har jeg udgivet denne lille Bog, for at jeg kan regnes blandt dem, der gør Modstand mod Jødernes giftige Forehavener og advarer de Kristne, saa de vogter sig for Jøderne. Jeg havde ikke ment, af en Kristen skulde lade sig narre af jøderne, og føres i Elendighed og jammer. Men Djævelen er Verdens Gud, og hvor Guds Ord ikke er, gaar det ham godt, ikke blot blandt de svage, men ogsaa blandt de stærke. Gud hjælpe os. Amen.

Naade og Fred i Herren.

Kære Herre og gode Ven.

Jeg har modtaget et Skrift, hvori en Jøde har en Samtale med en Kristen, og hvori Jøden understaar sig at udlægge Skriftsprog (der angaar vor Tro, vor Herre Kristus og Maria, hans Moder) forkert og mistyde dem, fordi han tror derved at kunne omstøde vor Tros Grundvold.

Derpaa giver jeg jer og ham dette Svar.

Det er ikke min Mening, at jeg vil strides med Jøderne eller lære af dem, hvorledes de tyder eller forstaar Skriften. Det kender jeg altsammen godt nok forud. Langt mindre omgaas jeg med den Tanke, at jeg vil omvende Jøderne. Thi det er umuligt. Endnu nytter det intetsteds med Jøderne og har altid kun gjort Ondt værre. - Ogsaa fordi de er bleven saa haarde og haardhudede, at de ikke vil befries for den skrækkelige Plage, at de nu i fjorten Hundrede Aar er i Landflygtighed og endnu ikke kan opnaa at se nogen Ende eller bestemt Afslutning herpaa trods deres evige heftige Raaben og Skrigen til (som de mener) Gud: Hjælper (siger jeg) Slagene ikke, saa er det nemt at regne ud, at vor Tale og Udlægning vil hjælpe endnu langt mindre.

Derfor skal en Kristen give sig tilfreds og ikke strides med en Jøde. Men skal du eller vil du absolut tale med ham, saa sig ikke mere end dette: Hør du, Jøde, ved du ogsaa, at Jerusalem og jeres Herredømme samt Templet og Præstedømme nu har været ødelagt mere end 1460 Aar? Thi i dette Aar, da vi Kristne skriver Aar 1543 efter Kristi Fødsel, er det nøjagtig 1469 Aar, og det er altsaa lienimod 1500 Aar siden, at Vespasianus og Titus ødelagde Jerusalem og drev Jøderne ud derfra. Og lad saa Jøderne bides og disputere om denne lille Nød saa længe, de vil.

Thi en saa grusom Guds Vrede viser altsaa tydeligt nok, at de sandelig maa fejle og fare med Uret, det kan vel selv et Barn forstaa. Thi saa frygteligt maa man ikke tænke om Gud, at han skulde straffe sit eget Folk saa længe , saa grueligt og saa ubarmhjertigt og til og med tie stille, hverken trøste med Ord eller Gerninger, hverken fastsætte Tid eller Sted. Hvem vilde tro og haabe eller elske en saadan Gud? Lad os derfor slutte heraf, at Jøderne visselig er forstødte af Gud og ikke længere er hans Folk, han er heller ikke mere deres Gud; og hold jer til Skriftsproget hos Hosea l v. 9: Lo Ammi: »I er ikke mit Folk, og jeg er ikke jeres Gud«. Ja, det gaar dem altsaa desværre saaledes og kun saaledes og skrækkeligt. De kan udlægge det som de vil, men vi ser Værket for vore Øjne, det bedrager os ikke.

Og hvis der var en Tøddel Fornuft eller Forstand i dem, maatte de i Sandhed tænke saaledes ved sig selv: Ak Herre Gud, det gaar og staar ikke godt til med os, Elendigheden er for stor, for langvarig, for haard, Gud har glemt os o. s. v.

Jeg er ganske vist ingen Jøde, men jeg i Alvor ikke gerne tror paa en saa frygtelig Guds Vrede over dette Folk; thi jeg ræddes derfor, saa det gaar mig gennem Marv og Ben. Hvad vil det blive til med Guds evige Vrede i Helvede over alle falske Kristne og alle Vantro?

Nuvel, Jøderne maa regne Vor Herre Jesus for hvad de vil; vi ser, at det altsaa gaar saaledes, som skrevet staar i Luk. 21, 22, 23: »Naar I ser Jerusalem belejret af en Hær, saa mærk jer, at nu er hendes Ødelæggelses Dag kommen; thi disse er Hævnens Dage, og der skal blive stor Nød i Landet og Vrede over dette Folk«.

Altsaa, som sagt: Strides ikke meget med Jøderne om vore Trosartikler. Fra deres Ungdom af er de saaledes opdraget med Gift og Galde imod vor Herre, at der intet Haab er, før de kommer dertil, at de tilsidst er bleven gjort møre af deres Elendighed og tvungne til at bekende, at Messias er kommen, og at det er Vor Herre Jesus. Ellers er det alt for tidligt og ganske omsonst at disputere med dem. Saa vil vi da nu for at styrke vor Tro, og fordi Jøderne saa giftigt smæder vor Tro, vise hvilke grove Dumheder der indeholdes i deres Skrifter og i deres Udlægning. Kommer nogensinde en Jøde paa bedre Tanker, saa at han skammer sig, saa meget des bedre. Vi taler ikke nu med Jøder, derimod om Jøder og om deres Gerninger, som ogsaa vort Folk bør kende.

De har en Grund til at prale og trodse ud over alle Grænser. Den er, at de nedstammer fra Jordens fornemste Folk, fra Abraham, Sarah, Isak, Rebekka, Jakob pp. . Vi (Goijem) er Hedninger i Sammenligning med dem og i deres Øjne ikke Mennesker, derimod neppe værd at vi arme Orme skal ænses af dem. Thi vi er ikke udaf den samme ædle Slægt, Stamme, Fødsel og Herkomst.

Dette er en Begrundelse af deres Trods og Hovmod og efter min Mening den fornemste og stærkeste.

Det maa Gud taale af dem i deres Skoler, Bønner, Sange, deres Lære og hele Liv; saaledes gaar og staar de for ham og plager ham (da jeg altsaa taler om Gud med menneskeligt Sprogbrug). Der maa han høre paa, hvorledes de berømmer sig og priser Gud, fordi han har adskilt dem fra Hedningerne og udvalgt dem som sit eget hellige Folk. Og der er ingen Ende paa, saa de roser sig af deres Herkomst og deres legemlige Nedstamning fra Fædrene.

Og ydermere - for at deres rasende, vanvittige og taabelige Galskab skal blive fuldkommen, roser de sig og takker Gud, først fordi de er skabt som Mennesker og ikke som Dyr; for det andet fordi de er Israel og ikke Goijem (Hedninger); for det tredie, fordi de er født Mænd og ikke Kvinder. Disse Taabeligheder har de ikke fra Israel, men fra Goijem. Thi Historien beretter, at Grækeren Plato dagligt opsendte saadanne Lovprisninger og Taksigelser til Gud. Men skal saadan Hoffærdighed og Gudsbespottelse kaldes at lovprise Gud? Thi denne roste ogsaa sine Guder for disse tre Ting, -- at han var et Menneske og ikke et Dyr, en Mand og ikke en Kvinde, en Græker og ikke Ikke-Græker eller Barbar. Det er en Nars Selvros og en Gudsbespotters barbariske Tak: Aldeles ligesom om Valoner ogsaa vilde tænke om sig selv, at de alene var Mennesker, hele den øvrige Verden Umennesker, Ænder eller Mus i Sammenligning med dem.

Nuvel, ingen kan tage den Berømmelse fra dem, at de er af Israels Rod og Stamme. I det gamle Testamentes Tid har de af den Grund (og det forstaar ingen Jøde) tabt mange Slag i Krigen. Alle Profeter har straffet dem herfor, thi det er en hovmodig, kødelig Anmasselse, uden Aand og Tro; de er altsaa ogsaa af den Grund blevet myrdede og forfulgte. (Herefter følger flere Beviser, hentede fra Skriften, og de slutter saaledes:) Altsaa kalder Vor Herre dem Slangeyngel. Item Joh. 8, 39: »Er I Abrahams Børn, saa gør Abrahams Gerninger. Men I er Djævelens Børn, han er Eders Fader«.

Det var dem uudholdeligt, at de ikke skulde være Abrahams, men Djævelens Børn, hvad de heller ikke nu synes on. Thi naar de skulde opgive denne deres Berømmelses Grundvold, maatte alt det, der stod paa den, falde og blive anderledes.

(I det følgende bliver denne Selvros ud fra Skriftens Ord indgaaende imødegaaet og tilbagevist som ubegrundet Anmasselse. Disse Citater fra Skriften slutter da med følgende Ord:)

Men dette vil jeg sige for at styrke vor Tro. Thi Jøderne lade sig ikke fratage deres Hoffærdighed og Stolthed over deres Adel og Oprindelse, saaledes som ovenfor sagt. De er forstokkede.

Men vort Folk skal passe paa, at de ikke lader sig forføre af dette forstokkede, fordømte Folk (hvis Løgne Gud straffer og som stolt foragter hele Verden). Thi jøderne vil meget gerne trække os over til deres Tro og gøre det, hvorsomhelst de kan det. Og skulde Gud blive dem, Jøderne, naadig, saa maatte de først fjerne saadanne modbydelige Bønner og Sange om deres Berømmelse og deres Herkomsts Storhed fra deres Hjerter og Munde. Thi saadan Beden øger og forhøjer stadig mere Guds Vrede over dem. Men det vil de ikke gøre, de vil aldrig ydmyge sig saa dybt, undtagen hvad enkelte Personer, hvem Gud særligt drager til sig og udløser fra deres gruelige Fordærv, kunde gøre.

Den anden Storhed og Berømmelse, hvoraf jøderne blærer sig og paa Grund af hvilken de mener at have Ret til stolt og hovmodigt at foragte alle andre Mennesker, er den, at de har Skikken med Omskærelsen fra Abraham.

Gud hjælpe os, hvor maa vi Hedninger da være utaalelige for dem i deres Skoler, Bønner, Sange og Lærdomme. Hvor modbydeligt maa vi Stakler stinke i deres Næser, fordi vi er uomskaarne.

(Her følger længere teologiske Udredninger med Beviser fra talrige Citater fra Skriften, øg tilsidst den 5. Salme, hvori hedder:)

Denne Salme angaar alle Mennesker...., især og fornemmelig Jøderne, for hvis Skyld den i Særdeleshed (ligesom alle andre Dele af Skriften) er givet og skrevet, og de bliver ogsaa mesterligt afslørede for alle Hedninger. Thi dem er dets som har vist allevegne en gudløs Handlemaade, Afguderi, som har bekendt falsk Lære og har haft uomskaarne Hjerter, saa at Moses selv og alle Profeterne jamrer og klager over dem. Medens de selv tiltrods herfor altid har troet at være Gud til Behag, og slaaet Profeterne ihjel har de. De er det mest ondskabsfulde, halsstarrige Folk, der ikke har ladet sig fra onde omvende til gode Gerninger hverken ved Prædiken, Skænden eller ved Profeternes Lære saaledes som Skriften Gang paa Gang viser, og dog vil de være Guds Tjenere og bestaa for hans Dom. De er de pralende, hoffærdige Skelme, som indtil denne Dag ikke kan gøre andet end at rose sig selv af deres Stamme og Herkoinst, rose sig selv og foragte og forbande hele Verden i deres Skoler, Bønner og Belæringer, og dog mener de at kunne bestaa for Guds Øjne som hans kæreste Børn. 1)

De er de rigtige Løgnere og Blodhunde, som fra Begyndelsen og til vore Dage har fordrejet og forfalsket hele Skriften med deres forløjede Udlægning 2) Og al deres Hjerters ængstelige Sukken og Længsel og Haab gaar ud paa, at de engang maa behandle os Hedninger ligesom i sin Tid Esther behandlede Hedningerne. . . . Og hvor de elsker Esthers Bog, der stemmer saa godt med deres blodtørstige, hævngerrige, morderiske Begæringer og Haab. Aldrig nogensinde har Solen skinnet paa et mere blodtørstigt og hævngerrigt Folk end dette, som tror om sig selv, at de er netop Guds Folk, for at de skal og maa myrde og ødelægge Hedningerne! Og det er ogsaa det allerstørste, som de venter af deres Messias: Han skal ved deres Sværd myrde og ombringe den ganske Verden. Hvad de selv i Begyndelsen gjorde hele Verden over imod os Kristne og stadig gerne vilde gøre, hvis de blot kunde. Ofte nok har de ogsaa forsøgt det og har derfor faaet ordentligt paa Snuden. Men derom maaske mere senere. (Luther optæller nu her videre de forskellige falske Grunde til, at Jøderne berømmer sig selv i Sammenligning

Note1) Sammenlign dette og det følgende med "Zions Vises Protokoller" og især med den deri citerede Esthers Bog. Og ogsaa med de i den nyeste Tid af Jøden Bela Kuhn og den forjødede russiske Sowjet-Regering i Rusland forøvede Millionmyrderier.

Note2) Eller kan en samvittighedsfuldd Fortolker f.Eks. holde Brugen af ægyptiske Klæder og Husgeraad for at være guddommelig Befaling?

med andre Folk: Foruden den i Moselov befalede Omskæring og de derpaa begrundede jødiske Loves Rigtighed anfører han talrige Bibelord, som klager over Frafald, Fritænkeri og Uretfærdighed og taler om Djævelen, hvem han sammenligner jøderne med):

Hvor langt bedre vilde det ikke være for dem, der, som de ikke ejede Guds Bud eller kendte til det. Thi havde de det ikke, saa var de ikke fordømte. Men de er fordømte, fordi de har hans Bud og dog ikke holder det, men tvertimod uden Ophør synder imod det.

Ligesaa godt kunde Mordere og Horkvinder, Tyve og Skalke og alle onde Mennesker berømme sig af, at de skulde være Guds særligt hellige Folk, fordi de kender hans Ord og ved, at de skal frygte ham og være ham lydig, elske ham og tjene ham, ære hans Navn, ikke myrde, ikke bedrive Hor o. s. v. Men nu, da de synder og bliver fordømt, saa er det netop, fordi de har Guds hellige, retfærdige Ord og alligevel synder imod det. Lad dem saa kun, ligesom Jøderne, rose sig af, at Gud gennem sin Lov har helliggjort dem og blandt alle Mennesker udvalgt dem som sit særlige Folk.

En saadan Berømmelse er det ogsaa, at jøderne roser sig af i deres Skoler, de lover og takker Gud, at han har helliggjort dem og udvalgt dem til sit særlige Folk, skønt de godt ved, at det intet har paa sig, at de er fulde af Hovmodighed, Misundelse, Begær, Gerrighed og alle Slags Ondskab, og allermest de, der i deres Bønner anstiller sig mest andægtige og hellige. Thi de er saa blinde, at de ikke alene driver Aager, (jeg skal tie om deres andre Laster) men endda lærer, at det er en Rettighed, som Gud har givet dem gennem Moses, hvor de, som i alle andre Tilfælde, lyver skammelig om Gud, men det har jeg ikke nu Tid at tale om. 1)

Naar de ti Bud ikke bliver holdt, hvad betyder saa Lydighed mod andre Love, andet end lutter Gøglespil og Fastelavnsløjer, ja en ren og skær Bespottelse, hvorved Gud bliver gjort til Nar? Ganske ligesom hvis en ond Helvedeskarl gik i Pavens, Kardinalers, Biskoppers og Prædikanters Tøj og holdt alle de Love og Vedtægter, som saadanne Folk holder, og at han saa under denne gejstlige Prydelse var en rigtig Djævel, en Ulv, en Kirkefjende,

Note1) Sammenlign Goethe i "Jahrmarkt von Plundersweilern": De har en Tro, der giver dem Lov til at røve fra andre.

fjende, en Gudsbespotter, der traadte baade Evangeliet og de ti Bud under Fode, forbandede og fordømte det: O hvor vilde det ikke synes Gud en skøn Hellig!

Eller hvis en smuk Kvinde offentlig bar Kransen og i hele sin Væremaade holdt sig alle Love og Regler efterrettelig, som passer sig for den jomfruelige Tugt og Stand, og saa under denne Overflade var en modbydelig, skammelig Hore, der syndede mod de ti Bud, hvad hjalp det hende saa med den smukke Lydighed, og at hun udadtil førte sig med al en jomfrus Værdighed og Væsen? Det vilde hjælpe hende saa meget, at man vilde være hende syv Gange mere fjendtlig stemt, end om hun lige ud var en offentlig Hore! Og Gud har til alle Tider gennem Profeterne skældt Israels Børn ud for at være en saadan ond Hore, for at de under udvendig Lovlydighed og Helligheds Skin og Prydelse øver al Slags Afguderi og Ondskab, saaledes som Hoseas særligt klager i Kap. 2, 4, 5. For vel er det skønt, naar en Jomfru eller Kvinde er from, naar hun er ærlig og renligt klædt og smykket og forstaar at gebærde sig med udvortes Ynde. Men er hun en Hore, saa anstaar Klæderne, Smykkerne, Kransen og Pynten meget bedre en So, der ligger i Snavset, saaledes som Salomo ogsaa siger: En skøn, taabelig Kvinde (det er en Hore) er som en gylden Ring i Næsen paa en So.

Derfor er det vel værd at tie, hellere end at rose sig af (Kendskab til) Mose Love om de overfladiske Ting, naar de ti Bud ikke holdes. Ja, de gør sig syv Gange mere uværdige til at være Guds Folk end Hedningerne.

Lad dem fare! Og lad os holde os til dem, som beder Miserere, den 51. Salme, det er de der ved og forstaar, hvad det betyder at holde eller ikke holde Loven.

Og læg nu Mærke til, kære Kristne, hvad du gør, naar du lader dig forføre af de blinde jøder. Da gaar det visselig, som Ordsproget siger: Naar en Blind leder en Blind, da falder de begge i Graven. Andet kan du ikke lære af dem. De mangler Forstaaelse af de guddommelige Love og dog roser de sig og er hovmodige overfor alle Hedninge, der dog er langt værdigere for Gud, end de er, fordi disse ikke bar en saadan hellighedens Hovmod og dog følger Loven langt mere end Jøderne, disse hovmodige Hellige og forbandede Gudsbespottere og Løgnere.

Vogt dig derfor for Jøderne og pas paa, hvor de har deres Skoler, da disse ikke er andet end en Satansrede, hvori der kun findes Indbildskhed, Løgn og Modbydelighed, til aller bitreste og giftigste Skændsel for Gud og alle Mennesker, som var det Djævelen selv. Og hvorsomhelst du ser eller hører en Jøde undervise, da tænk kun, at der hører du en giftig Basilisk, hvis Udseende alene er nok til at forgive og dræbe Folk. De er saaledes overgivet til Guds Vrede, fordi de mener, at deres Selvros, Hoffærdighed, at de lyver om Gud, forbander alle Mennesker, er lutter ægte rigtig storslaaet Gudstjeneste, der anstaar sig saadanne ædle Efterkommere fra Fædrene og omskaarne Hellige, (hvor slette de end selv føler, at de er, med deres haandgribelige Laster) og saa tror de endda herved at have gjort Ret og Skel.

Vogt dig for dem!

Og for det fjerde praler de med stor Selvros og Hoffærdighed af, at de har faaet det Land Canaan, Staden Jerusalem og Templet af Gud. Til Trods for, at Gud Gang efter Gang har knust denne Selvros og Hovmodighed, særligt ved Kongen af Babylon, der drev dem i Landflygtighed og ødelagde alt for dem, ligesom Kongen af Assyrien tidligere havde bortført og forstyrret det hele Israel og tilsidst gennem Romerne fuldstændig udryddede og ødelagde dem, hvad der nu er over fjorten Hundrede Aar siden. Og alt dette, for at de skal forstaa, at Gud ikke har og heller ikke vil ænse deres Land, By, Tempel, Præstedømme eller Fyrstendømme, saa at han af den Grund skulde regne dem for sit eget særlige Folk. Endnu er deres jernhaarde Nakker (som Esaias siger) ikke bleven bøjede eller deres haarde Pander bleven røde af Skam, stadig forbliver de stærblinde og forhærdede, ubevægelige, og stadig haaber de, at Gud igen skal bringe dem hjem og give dem Alting tilbage.

De hører og ser ikke, at Gud gav dem alt, for at de skulde holde hans Bud, kun saa kunde de være hans Folk og Kirke. Aldeles ligesom naar de roser sig af deres Blod og Afstamning, men at han bar udvalgt netop dem, fordi de skulde holde hans Bud, det ænser og agter de ikke. De roser sig af deres Omskærelse, men hvorfor de er omskaarne, nemlig derfor, at de skulde holde hans Bud, det betyder intet for dem. De forstaar at prale af deres Love, Tempel, Gudstjeneste, Stad, Land og Herredømme, men hvorfor de fik det, det agter de ikke paa. Djævelen og alle hans Engle har besat dette Folk, saa de altid for Gud roser sig af de ydre Ting, deres Gaver, deres Gøren og Laden, hvilket vil sige: De ofrer ham de tomme Hylstre uden Kærne. Dette Offer skal han paaskønne og derfor betragte dem som sit eget Folk, velsigne og ophøje dem over alle Hedninger. Men at han forlanger, de skal holde hans Bud, saa de virkelig betragter ham som Gud, det bryder de sig ikke om. Og saa gaar det da efter Mose Ord: De anser mig ikke for deres Gud, saa regner jeg dem heller ikke for mit Folk, som der ogsaa staar hos Hosea.

Og dersom Gud ikke havde ladet Staden Jerusalem ødelægge, havde ladet dem fordrive fra deres Land, men at de i Stedet havde beholdt alt som forhen, saa havde ingen kunnet sige dem paa, at de ikke var Guds Folk, fordi de stadig havde Templet, Staden og Landet, uanset hvor ondt, ulydigt og halsstarrigt et Folk de end var. Og det var uden Forskel, om saa Profeterne dagligt havde tugtet dem og Tusinde Moses'er havde staaet og skreget: I er ikke Guds Folk, thi I er ulydige og genstridige imod Jeres Gud. Kan de dog nu ikke snart holde op med deres sindssyge, rasende Pralen med, at de er Guds Folk, hvorfor de nu i 1500 Aar har været fordrevne, forstyrrede og kastet til Jorden. Endnu haaber de ved egen Fortjeneste at komme derhen igen. Thi de har jo ingen Løfter, hvormed de kan trøste sig, undtagen hvad de laver sammen af forvirrede Tydninger i Skriften. . . Saaledes forhærder Jøderne sig tilsidst i deres onde Vilje og tager forsætlig fejl og vil ikke vige fra deres Rabbineres Lærdomme. Saa er vi ogsaa nødt til at lade dem gaa deres egne Veje og ikke agte paa deres giftige Bespottelser og Løgne.

Mig er det ogsaa gaaet saadan. Tre lærde jøder kom til mig i det Haab, at de skulde Finde en ny jøde i mig, fordi vi er begyndt at læse Hebraisk her i Wittenberg og foregav ogsaa, at naar vi Kristne begyndte at læse deres Bøger, saa skulde alt snart blive bedre. Da jeg nu begyndte at disputere med dem, kom de som deres Maade engang er med deres Kommentarer. Men da jeg tvang dem til at holde sig til Teksten, afbrød de mig og sagde, de maatte tro deres Rabbinere, ligesom vi troede Paven og Lægen o. s. v. Nu havde jeg Medlidenhed med dem og gav dem et Anbefalingsbrev til den Ret, der giver Jøder Beskyttelse, og bad dem, de skulde for Kristi Skyld lade dem drage frit videre. Men senere fik jeg at vide, at de havde kaldt Kristus for: en hængt Sjagrer. Derfor vil jeg ikke mere have noget at gøre med en Jøde. De er, som Paulus siger, overgivet til Vreden: jo mere man hjælper dem, des haardere og ondere bliver de. Lad dem passe sig selv. 1).

(Her følger nu igen meget udførlige teologisk-videnskabelige og derfor ikke letfattelige og med mange Citater fra Bibelen bilagte Beviser, som det vilde tage for megen Plads at gengive).

Kun skal vi ud af denne Masse af slaaende Beviser fra Skriften anføre følgende, Haggai 2: Saaledes taler Herren:

De har fra Ungdommen af indsuget et saa giftigt Had imod Goijems, fra deres Forældre og Rabbinere, og indsuger det endnu uden Ophør, at det gaar dem, som den 109. Salme siger, gennem Blod og Kød, gennem Marv og Ben, er bleven deres anden Natur og deres andet Liv. Og lige saa lidt som de kan forandre deres Kød og Blod, deres Marv og Ben, lige saa lidt kan de forandre en saadan Stolthed og Misundelse. De maa vedblive at være saaledes og fordærves, hvor Gud ikke bevirker et særlig stort Under.

Derfor maa du vide, kære Kristne, og tvivl ikke paa det, at du efter Djævelen ikke har nogen bitrere, giftigere, hæftigere Fjende end den rigtige Jøde, der for Alvor ønsker at være Jøde. Der kan maaske være nogle iblandt dem, som tror, hvad Koen eller Gaasen tror. Dog Afstamningen og Omskærelsen hænger ved dem alle 2). Derfor giver man dem i Historien ofte Skyld for, at de forgifter Brøndene, stjæler Børn og udsuger deres Blod, som i Trent, Weissensee o. s. v. De siger ganske vist nej. Men enten det nu er saadan eller ikke, saa ved jeg vel, at det ikke mangler dem paa fuldstændig Beredvillighed dertil, dersom det kunde lykkes dem hemmeligt eller aabenlyst at gøre dette i Gerning. Det bør du stole paa og rette dig efter. 3)

Note 1) Efter en saadan Forklaring af Luther er den velvillige Holdning, mange Lutheranere indtager overfor Jøder, ganske uforstaaelig.

Note 2) Denne Sætning er en af de faa, hvor Luther ogsaa synes at berøre Racespørgsmaalet.

Note 3) Sløret om Ritualmordene, hvilke Luther kun har anet, synes i vore Dage at løfte sig mere og mere.

Men gør de noget godt, saa vid, at det er ikke af Kærlighed til dig, at det sker. Men fordi de maa have Plads til at bo hos os, maa de af Nød gøre noget. Men Hjertet er og bliver saaledes, som jeg har sagt. Vil du ikke tro mig, saa læs Lyra, Burgen og flere andre paalidelige, sandfærdige Mænd. Og selv om de ikke havde skrevet det, saa siger Skriften dog, at de to Slags Sæd, Slangens og Kvindens, maa være Fjender, og Gud og Djævelen ikke forliges godt. Ogsaa nok finder man det i deres Skrifterog Bøger groft nok udtrykt.

Og vel maa et Menneske, der ikke kender Djævelen, forundre sig over, hvorfor de skulde være de Kristne mere end andre saa fjendtligt sindede, da de dog ingen Grund har hertil; thi vi viser dem alt muligt Godt: De lever hjemme hos os, under vor Skærmen og Beskyttelse, de bruger vort Land og vore Veje, vore Marker og Gader, og imedens sidder Fyrsterne og Øvrigheden og snorker med aaben Mund, tillader Jøderne at tage af deres Punge og Kasser, at stjæle og røve, hvad de vil, og det vil sige: de tillader, at de selv og deres Undersaatter gennem Jødernes Aagren bliver skændede og udsugede og de lader sig gøre til Betlere ved Hjælp af deres egne Penge. Thi Jøderne, der er Udlændinge, havde jo beviseligt intet, saa hvad de har, maa være vort. Da de ikke arbejder, fortjener de intet, og vi skænker og giver dem intet. Dog har de vore Penge og vort Gods og er derfor vore Herrer i vore egne Lande, og skønt de er Udlændinge. Naar en Tyv stjæler syv Gylden, hænger man ham, røver han paa Gaden, mister han sit Hoved. Men en Jøde, - naar han røver og stjæler ti Tønder Guld ved Aager, saa er han kærere end Gud selv.

Og som Bevis roser de trøstigt sig selv og styrker deres bestandige og giftige Forbitrelse imod os, medens de taler indbyrdes og siger: Hold ud, se, hvorledes Gud er med os og heller ikke forlader sit Folk i dets Udlændighed. Vi arbejder ikke, har gode dovne Dage, de forbandede Goijems maa arbejde for os, men vi faar deres Penge; paa den Maade er vi deres Herrer, de derimod vore Tjenere.

Hold ud, kære Israels Børn, det vil blive bedre. Vor Messias vil komme, naar vi bliver saadan ved og ved Aager og paa anden Maade faar fat i alle Hedningernes Hembdath (hebraisk Ord for Besiddelse).

Nuvel, det finder vi os i af dem, der er under vor Beskyttelse og Skærm: Og endda forbander de os, som jeg har sagt. Men videre.

(Efter en længere exegetisk-historisk Udredning følger nu et højst interessant Afsnit, hvoraf det fremgaar, at Luther allerede den Gang kendte Talmud og Schulchan Aruch særdeles godt, og dette forklarer tilfulde hans forandrede Mening om Jøderne.)

Thi baade deres Talmud og Rabbinere skriver, at det er ingen Synd at dræbe, hvis en Jøde dræber en Hedning, men derimod, hvis han dræber en Broder i Israel. Og holder han ikke sin Ed til en Hedning, er det ikke en Synd. Ligeledes: Stjæle og røve (som de gør gennem Aager) fra Goijems er ingen Synd, men er Gud velbehageligt. Thi de mener, at fordi de er ud af ædelt Blod og omskaarne Hellige, men vi er forbandede Goijems, saa kan de ikke behandle os for groft eller forsynde sig for haardt imod os, fordi de er Verdens Herrer, og vi deres Tjenere, ja deres Kvæg......... Og hvad deres Rabbinere har lært, det siger os ogsaa vore Evangelister, Matth. 15, 6, at de har ophævet det fjerde Bud om at ære Fader og Moder. Og Matth. 23,13 lærer endnu skammeligere Ting. Hvad ogsaa Matth. 5, 28 siger efter Kristus, hvorledes de har skalkagtigt prædiket og udlagt de ti Bud. Og i Templet bar de haft Vekselerboder, Kræmmerforretning og alle Slags Pengehandel, saa Vor Herre Kristus sagde, de havde gjort Guds Hus til en Morderhule. Nu kan du selv regne ud, hvilken skøn ære det er, hvor fuld af Herlighed det Hus maa være, naar Gud rnaa kalde sit eget Hus en Morderhule. Og Grunden er, at saa mange Sjæle er bleven myrdede ved deres skrækkelige, falske Lære, ved dobbelt Afguderi. Og i en saadan Lære fremturer endnu i vore Dage Jøderne og gør som deres Fædre, fordrejer Guds Ord, er gerrige, aagrer, stjæler, myrder (hvor de kan komme til det) og det samme lærer de deres Børn om og om igen. Hvor meget ærligere skriver og lærer ikke den hedenske Filosofi og ogsaa Digterne, ikke alene om Guds Styre og om det fremtidige Liv, men ogsaa om jordiske Dyder, thi de lærer, at et Menneske er skyldig at tjene andre, ogsaa at holde sit Ord til sin Fjende og være tro og hjælpsom mod dem, der er i Nød, saaledes som Cicero og hans Lige lærer.

Ja, jeg holder for, at der i Æsops Fabler, i det Halve af Catone, i Terentis samtlige Komedier staar mere Visdom og gode Lærdomme, end der kan Findes i alle Talmudiske Lærere og Rabbineres Bøger og i alle jøders Hjerter.

Hvis nogen skulde tænke, jeg siger for meget, - jeg siger ikke for meget, derimod alt for lidt. Thi jeg ser i deres Skrifter, at de forbander os Goijems og i deres Skoler og Bønner ønsker os alle Ulykker. (Sammenlign hermed ogsaa den berygtede Kol-Nidre-Bøn!). De røveros vore Penge og vort Gods gennem Aager, og hvor de kan, viser de os al mulig Ondskab. Mener (og det er det værste ved det) derved at gøre rigtigt. Det er: At tjene Gud ved at lære at handle saaledes. Dette har ingen Hedninger gjort og heller ingen gør det, undtagen Djævelen selv og de, han har besat, saaledes som han har besat Jøderne. Burgensis, der har været en meget lærd Rabbiner, og som ved Guds Naade er bleven Kristen (hvad der er sjældent) er særlig betaget af, at de i deres Skoler forbander os Kristne saa skrækkeligt (saaledes som Lyra ogsaa skriver) og slutter deraf, at de ikke kan være Guds Folk. Thi var de Guds Folk, vilde de gøre, hvad de fangne jøder i Babylon gjorde, og hvorom Jeremias skriver saaledes: Bed for Kongen og for Staden, hvor I er fangne, thi gennem deres Fred har I ogsaa Fred. Men vore Bastarder og falske Jøder mener, de maa forbande os, hade os og gøre os alt det Onde, de blot kan, skønt de dog ingen Grund har til det. Derfor er de visselig ikke Guds Folk. Om dette senere mere.

(Meget interessante er Udredningerne over den jødisk-spindsfindige Maade, hvorpaa de skjuler deres Had til Jesus og de Kristne under Pseudonymer). Der staar saaledes: Efter dette tager de Jesus Navn. Thi Jesus hedder paa Hebrajisk »Frelser« eller »Hjælper«. De gamle Saksere har brugt et Navn: Helprich eller Hilprich, der lyder ganske som Navnet Jesus, som vi nu kunde sige Hulfrich, der betyder den, der kan og skal hjælpe. Men Jøderne tager Navnet og kalder ham »Jesu«, hvad der i Hebrajisk hverken er et Ord eller et Navn, derimod tre Bogstaver, som Zifrene eller Talbogstaverne, som om jeg vilde tage Talbogstaverne C. L. U. ziffertalmæssigt og lave Ordet CLU ud af det, der betyder 155. Altsaa siger de: Jesu, det er: 316. Saadanne Tal giver et andet Navn, der betyder: Hebel Vorik. Derfra kan du videre læse Anton!

Margaritham, hvilke Satansstreger de dog driver med saadanne Ord og Tal.

Saaledes gør de ogsaa overfor os Kristne, naar de modtager os, og vi kommer til dem og fordrejer Ordet: Velkommen i Guds Navn. Saa siger de: Sched vil komme, hvilket betyder: Kom, Djævel! Eller: Der kommer en Djævel. Fordi vi nu ikke forstaar Hebrajisk, øver de altsaa deres grimme Kunster paa os, naar vi mener, de taler venligt med os, og i Stedet forbander de os ned i Helvedes Ild og ønsker os alle Ulykker.

Dernæst kalder de Ham et Horebarn og Maria en Hore, som har faaet Ham med en Smed i Ægteskabsbrud. Jeg maa, skønt ugerne, tale saa groft, i Trods mod Djævelen. Nu ved de særdeles vel, at de lyver saaledes af lutter Had og Vrangvilje, kun for at de skal kunne forgifte deres stakkels Ungdom og de enfoldige Jøder bittert nok imod Vor Herres Person, for at de ikke skal tiltrækkes af hans Lære (som de ikke kan benægte).

Saaledes sigter ogsaa Sebastianus Münster i sin Biblia en giftig Rabbiner for, at de kalder den kære Moder ikke »Maria«, men derimod »Haria«, Sterquilinium, en Hoben Snavs. Og hvem ved, hvad de mere har for mellem dem selv, og som vi ikke ved noget om?

(Luther viser nu videre i udførlige videnskabelige Drøftelser over Messias og Bar-Kochbad pp. sit nøje Kendskab til det jødiske Væsen, de hemmelige Skrifter og Judas Forhaabninger og kommer tilsidst til det foregivne saakaldte jødiske »Fangenskab« blandt de Kristne).

Se nu, hvilken fin, tyk Løgn det er, naar de klager over, at de er i Fangenskab hos os. Det er over 1400 Aar siden, at Jerusalem blev ødelagt, og vi Kristne er rent ud gennem 300 Aar hele Verden over bleven martret og forfulgt af Jøderne (som ovenfor sagt). Vi skulde vel have Grund til at klage, fordi de i al den Tid har fanget og dræbt os Kristne, hvad der er den rene Sandhed. Og endda ved vi ikke endnu den Dag i Dag, hvilken Djævel der har bragt dem til vort Land. Vi har ikke hentet dem fra Jerusalem.

Til og med er der endnu ingen, der har holdt paa dem, Landet og Gaderne staar dem aabne, de kan drage afsted til deres Land naarsomhelst det passer dem. Vi vilde endda gerne give dem Gaver, blot vi kunde blive fri for dem. Thi de er en svær Byrde for os, en Plage, Pestilens og lutter haard Ulykke for vort Land. For at sige Sandheden, er de ofte bleven drevet væk med Vold (saa ti stille med, at vi skulde holde paa dem) fra Frankrig (som de kalder Zarpath eller Obadja) der var en særlig fin Rede, er de fordrevne. Nu for nylig er de fordrevet af den kære Kejser Karolo af Hispania (som de kalder for Sepharad) ogsaa en af de allerbedste Reder. . . og i Aar ud fra alle de bøhmiske Lande, hvor de endog i Prag havde en særlig god Rede der. Ligeledes er i min Levetid de drevet ud af Regensburg, Magdeborg og flere andre Steder.

Kalder man det at holde nogen fangen, naar man ikke kan udstaa at have ham i Landet eller i Huset? Javel, de holder os Kristne fangne i vort eget Land, de lader os arbejde i vort Ansigts Sved, og medens de vinder Gods og Guld, sidder de paa samme Tid ved Ovnen, dovner, praler og steger Æbler, fraaser, drikker, lever lækkert og godt af hvad vi kan slæbe sammen, har fanget os og vore Ejendomme ved Hjælp af deres forbandede Aager, endda spotter de os og spytter paa os, fordi vi arbejder, medens de dovne Junkere lader syv være lige og er altsaa vore Herrer, som vi er deres Tjenere, med vort eget Gods, Sved og Arbejde. Ydermere forbander de endda Vor Herre og os til Løn og Tak.

Skulde Djævelen vel ikke le og danse, naar han kan have saadan et fint Paradis hos os Kristne, saa han ved Hjælp af Jøderne, hans Hellige, kan æde alt, hvad vort er, og til Løn fylde vor Næse og vor Mund (med Skarn) og dertil spotte og forbande Gud og dertil os Mennesker.

De har ikke kunnet have saa gode Dage i Jerusalem under David og Salomon med deres eget Gods, som de nu har det med vort, som de daglig stjæler og røver fra os. Endda klager de over, at vi har fanget dem! Ja, - vi har og holder dem fangne, ligesom jeg holder min Calculum, mit buldne Blod og alle andre Sygdomme og Ulykker fangne, og dem maa jeg adlyde som en stakkels Tjener. Skønt jeg Hjertens gerne saa, at Jøderne tog det altsammen med sig til Palæstina.

Naar nu det er sikkert og vist, at vi ikke holder dem fangen, hvormed har vi da gjort os fortjent til, at saadanne store, fornemme Hellige er os saa fjendtligt sindede? Vi kalder dog ikke vore Kvinder Horer, saaledes som de siger om Maria, Jesu Moder. Vi kalder ikke dem for Horebørn, hvad de kalder Vor Herre Kristus. l) Vi forbander dem ikke, men ønsker dem alt Godt, legemligt og aandeligt, huser dem og. spiser og drikker sammen med dem. Vi stjæler og blodsuger ikke deres Børn, 2) forgifter ikke Vandet og tørster ikke efter deres Blod. Hvormed har vi da fortjent saa grusom Vrede og Misundelse og Had fra saadanne store, hellige Guds Børn?

Det er kun det samme, som vi tidligere har citeret efter Moses, at Gud har slaaet dem med Vanvid, Blindhed og med Raseri i Hjertet. Saa er det vel ogsaa vor Fejl, at vi ikke hævner det (uskyldige) Blod, som de er Skyld i, at vor Herre og de Kristne og indtil vore Dage Børn bar maattet udgyde. At vi ikke slaar dem ihjel, men tiltrods for alle deres Myrderier, Forbandelser, Laster, Løgne, Skændselsgerninger, lader dem sidde frit hos os, beskytter og skærmer deres Skoler, Huse, Liv og Gods, saa de kan dovne og føle sig trygge og trøstigt kan udsuge os for vore Penge og vort Gods. Og yderligere kan spotte os og spytte paa os, og tilsidst blive saa mægtige, at de for vore store Synders Skyld kan slaa os ihjel, tage alt vort Gods, hvad de dagligt beder om og haaber maa ske.

Sig mig nu, om de ikke har vægtige Grunde til at være os forbandede Goijems fjendtligt sindede, til at forbande os og søge at bringe den uhjælpelige evige Fordærvelse ned over os. - (Se sidste Del af Zions Vises Protokoller,O.E.).

Hvad skal vi Kristne nu gøre med dette fordærvede, fordømte Jødefolk?

Det er ikke til at udholde, efter at de er hos os, og vi kender alle deres Løgne, Bagtalelser og Forbandelser, og vi dog maa passe paa, at vi ikke bliver delagtige i alle deres Løgne, Forbandelser og Bagtalelser. Vi kan dog ikke, (som Profeterne siger) slukke Guds Vredes uudslukkelige Ild, og heller ikke kunne vi omvende Jøderne. Saa maa vi med Bønner og Gudsfrygt udøve en haard Barmhjertighed, om det dog skulde være muligt for os at redde nogle af dem ud af Flammen og Ilden.

Vi tør ikke hævne os, de har Hævnen om deres Hals, tusinde Gange værre, end vi kunde ønske dem den. Jeg vil give mit betænksomme Raad.

Note 1) Sammenlign her den jødiske Saarbarhed med den Frækhed, hvor med de angriber den kristelige Religion i vore Dage.

Note 2) Ejendommeligt nok berører Luther stadig paany den gennem Aarhundreder uudryddelige Tro paa de jødiske Ritualmord af Børn.

Først, at man skulde tænde Ild paa deres Synagoger og Skoler og kaste Jord hen over det, der ikke vil brænde, saa at intet Menneske nogensinde skulde se en Sten eller en Slagge af det. Og dette skal man gøre til Ære for Vor Herre og den hele Kristenhed, saa at Gud kan se, at vi er Kristne og visselig ikke vil taale og indvillige i at være med til saadan offentlige Løgne, Bagvaskelser og Forbandelser imod hans Søn og hans kristne Folk.

Thi hvad vi hidtil har fundet os i af Uvidenhed (jeg har selv ikke før vidst Besked) det vil Gud tilgive os. Men nu ved vi det og skal derfor være fri for at have og beskytte et saadant Hus, hvori de kan lyve om, bagtale, forbande, spytte paa, og skænde os (som forhen omtalt). Det vilde være lige saa slemt, som om vi selv gjorde det, og meget værre, som vi vel ved.

Moses skriver Deutero. at, hvor somhelst der drives Afguderi i en Stad, skal denne Stad ødelægges ved Ild og intet skal blive til Rest. Og dersom han levede nu, saa vilde han selv være den første til at sætte Ild paa Jødeskolerne og Jødernes Huse.

(Saa følger Beviser fra Skriften.)

For det andet maa man ligeledes sønderbryde og ødelægge deres Huse. For de bedriver det samme Uvæsen i dem som i deres Skoler. Derpaa kan man lade dem indrette sig under et Tag eller i en Stald, ligesom Zigøjnerne, for at de skal forstaa, at de er ikke Herrer i vort Land, saaledes som de praler af, men derimod fangen i Landflygtighed, saaledes som de uden Ophør skriger op om og beklager sig over ligeoverfor Gud.

For det tredie skal man fratage dem alle deres Bedebøger og thalmudiske Skrifter, hvoraf de lærer alt saadant Afguderi, Løgne, Forbandelser og Bagvaskelser.

For det fjerde, at man under Dødsstraf forbyder deres Rabbinere vedblivende at undervise. Thi dette Embede har de mistet enhver Ret til, fordi de har holdt de arme Jøder der fangne med det Ord hos Moses 17,1l,12, hvori han paabyder, at de skal være deres Lærere lydige mod Tab af Liv og Sjæl. Skønt Moses selv tilføjer: Hvad de lærer dig efter Herrens Bud. Men saadant overser de Banditter og bruger det stakkels Folks Lydighed imod Herrens Lov og indgiver dem al den Gift, Forbandelse og Bagtalelse. - -

For det femte: At man fuldstændig ophæve Jødernes Beskyttelse paa Vejene. Thi de har intet at gøre paa Landet, eftersom de dog ikke er Herrer eller offentligt ansatte eller er Handelsmand eller lignende. De skal blive hjemme. Jeg har hørt sige, at der for Tiden er en rig Jøde, der rejser rundt paa Landet med tolv Heste (han vil vel være en Kochab (falsk Messias?) og ødelægger Fyrster, Herrer, Land og Folk med Aager, saa at de store Herrer ser skævt til det. Vil I Fyrster og Herrer ikke paa anden Vis forbyde disse Aagerkarle Vejene, saa burde der samles et Rytteri til at gaa imod dem, fordi de lærer af denne lille Bog, hvad Jøderne virkelig er, og hvorledes man bør omgaas med dem og ikke beskytte dem, Thi I maa og kan ikke beskytte dem, I vilde da for Gud være skyldig i alle deres Ugerninger. Og I bør betænke, hvad der vilde komme ud deraf.

For det sjette: Man bør forbyde dem al Aagren, som allerede Moses forbød dem, for de er ikke Herrer i et fremmed Land, og man bør tage alle deres Ejendele og Klenodier af Guld og Sølv og lægge det til Side og opbevare det. Og Grunden til at gøre dette er, at alt, hvad de har (som jeg før har sagt) det har de stjaalet og røvet fra os ved deres Aagren, fordi de ikke lever af andet. Disse Penge skal man give (og kun disse) til en Jøde, saa han faar to til tre Hundrede Floriner, naar han beder indtrængende om det, saa han kan begynde at skaffe sig et Levegrød og underholde sin arme Kone og sine Børn og underholde de gamle og svagelige. - Thi saadant Gods, der er vundet ved Ondskab, er forbandet, naar man ikke anvender det efter Guds Vilje til gode nødvendige Formaal.

Men naar de praler af, at Moses har tilladt dem at drive Aager med de fremmede, Deutero. 23, 20 (og de har intet andet at skyde sig ind under) saa skal man svare dertil: Der er to forskellige Slags Jøder eller Israelitter. De første er de, som Moses førte ud af Ægypten til Landet Kanaan, saaledes som Gud havde befalet ham det, og disse gav han en Lov, som de skulde lyde i dette Land, ikke ellers, og indtil Messias kom. . . De andre Jøder er Kejserens jøder, ikke Moses jøder. De begyndte paa Pilatus's Tid, Landshøvdingen i Judæa. Thi da han fra sit Dommersæde spurgte dem: »Hvad vil I, at jeg skal gøre med Jesus, den Jødernes Konge?« Da skreg de: »Korsfæst, - korsfæst ham«. Men han sagde: »Skal jeg korsfæste Eders Konge?« Og de raabte igen: »Vi har ingen anden Konge end Kejseren«. En saadan Underdanighed overfor Kejseren havde Gud ikke befalet dem, den viste de frivilligt. Da nu Kejseren fordrede skyldig Lydighed, strittede de imod og satte sig op imod ham, vilde nu ikke vere Kejseren underdanig. Da kom han og visiterede sine Undersaatter og hentede dem til Jerusalem, spredte dem ud over hele sit Rige, for at de skulle være lydige. Fra dem nedstammer de nuværende Jødebærme, som Moses ikke kender noget til, og de heller ikke til ham, da de ikke holder noget Bud eller nogen Sætning hos Moses. Vil de nu drage Fordel af Moses Lov, saa maa de først igen komme tilbage til Landet Kanaan og blive Moses Jøder, holde hans Bud og undertvinge Fremmede og Hedninger. Saa kan de aagre som de vil og saa meget, de Fremmede vil finde sig i.

Fordi de nu huserer i fremmede Lande under Kejseren og er ulydige imod Moses, skal de ogsaa holde Kejserens Lov og ikke aagre imod deres Overherrers Interesser, indtil de bliver lydige imod Moses. Thi Moses Lov er endnu aldrig kommen et Skridt udenfor Kanaans Land eller udenfor Israels Folk. Thi han er ikke bleven sendt til Ægypterne, Babylonerne eller noget som helst andet Folk med sin Lov, men ene og alene til det Folk, som han bragte ud af Ægypten til det Land Kanaan, saaledes som han ofte selv siger det i Deutero: De skal holde saadanne Love i de Lande, som de vilde indtage hinsides Jordan.

Og fordi Præstedømme, Gudstjeneste, Fyrstendømme, ja, det meste og næsten alt, hvad Moses har bygget op, er faldet for over 1400 Aar siden, saa er det sikkert, at hans Lov ogsaa er falden, og at det er Slut dermed. Derfor skal man lade disse kejserlige Jøder vederfares Kejserens Ret og ikke tillade, at de vil være Moses Jøder, hvilket ingen af dem har været nu i mere end 1400 Aar. Thi de har ikke deres eget Land, langt mindre fremmed Land, hvor de kunde drive Aager efter Tilladelse af Moses.

For det syvende: At man giver de unge, stærke Jøder og Jødinder Plejl, Økse, Rive, Spade, Spinderok, Ten i Haanden og lader dem fortjene deres Brød i deres Ansigts Sved, saaledes som det er paalagt Adams Børn. Gen. 3,19: thi det passer sig ikke, at de vil lade os forbandede Goijems arbejde i vort Ansigts Sved, og de, de hellige Personer, vil nyde deres dovne Dage med Fester og Pragt og saa prale modbydeligt af, at de er de Kristnes Herrer; tvertimod skal man trække disse Skælmes Dovenskab ud af dem.

Men tager vi i Betragtning, at de gerne gør os Fortræd paa vor Person, vor Hustru, vore Børn, Tjenere, Dyr o. s. v., naar de tvinges til at arbejde for os, er det at vente, at saadanne høje Verdens Herrer og bitre, giftige Orme, uvant med Arbejde, meget nødig vil ydmyge sig for de forbandede Goijems. (Det er bemærkelsesværdigt, saa godt Luther kender Jøderne, O.E.) Saa jeg tror, det er klogest at lade det blive ved, at vi sammen med Frankrig, Hispanien, Bøhmen o. s. v. udregner, hvad de har snydt os for gennem Aager, og deler det retfærdigt, men drive dem selv ud af Landene. Thi, som vi hører, er Guds Vrede imod dem saa mægtig, at de kun bliver ondere og ondere ved blid Behandling, men en Smule bedre ved haard. - Derfor væk med dem for altid.

Jeg hører, at Jøderne giver store Pengesummer bort og paa den Maade gør sig nyttige for de store Herrer. Javel, men hvoraf giver de? Ikke af deres eget, men derimod af Herskabernes og Undersaatternes Gods, som de har stjaalet og røvet ved Aager. Og paa den Maade tager Herskaberne altsaa fra deres Undergivne det, som jøderne giver bort, og det vil sige: Undersaatterne maa give og lade sig flaa af jøderne, for at disse kan blive i Landet, vinde Tiltro, lyve frækt, bespotte, forbande og stjæle. Skulde de forbistrede jøder da ikke le godt i Skægget over, at vi saa skammeligt lader os gøre til Grin og narre og giver dem vore Penge, for at de kan blive i Landet og beedrive al Slags Ondskab? Dertil ydermere blive rige ved vort Sved og vort Blod, medens vi bliver fattige og udsuges af dem. Hvis det var rigtigt, at en Tjener, ja en Gæst eller en Fange skulde give sin Herre aarligt ti Floriner og til Gengæld stjæle Tusind fra ham, saa vil den Tjener eller Gæst blive hurtigt og let nok rig, Herren og Værten derimod i en Haandevending Betlere. Og hvis Jøderne kunde give Herskaberne saadanne Summer af deres egne Penge, hvad der er umuligt, og de dermed afkøbte os Beskyttelse og Sikkerhed, kunde lyve skammeligt om Vor Herre Kristus i deres Skoler, bagtale, spytte paa og forbande ham, desuden ønske os alle Ulykker, at vi alle maa kvæles og omkomme med vor Kejser, Fyrster, Herrer, Kvinder og Børn, - det vilde i Sandhed være det samme som, at vi havde solgt vor Kristendom, vore Herrer, hele Kristenheden og hele Kejserriget, os selv med Kvinder og Børn skammeligt billigt. Vilde Forræderen Judas ikke betragtes som mere hellig i Sammenligning med os? Ja, selv om hver eneste Jøde (saa mange som der er af dem) kunne give 100,000 Floriner, saa skulde vi dog ikke tillade, at de havde Magt til frit at bagtale, forbinde og spytte paa en eneste Kristen. Det vilde være alt for billigt Køb. Hvor langt mere uudholdeligt er det saa ikke at tænke, at vi skulde lade dem købe den ganske Kristenhed og os alle med vore egne Penge, lade Jøderne bagtale og forbande os og endda til Løn herfor gøre dem rige og lade dem herske over os, medens de i Tilgift lo af os og kroede sig.

Det vilde forskaffe Djævelen og alle hans Engle en rigtig Spas, som de kunde le af gennem Næsen, som en So ler til sine Grise, men fortjene Guds hæftigste Vrede.

Altsaa, kære Fyrster og Herrer, som har Jøder under jer, er mit Raad ikke tilpas, saa find et bedre, at I og vi alle afkaster den ulidelige djævelske Byrde som Jøderne er, saa at vi ikke for Gud er delagtige i alle deres Løgne, deres Laster, Foragt, Forbandelser, som de rasende Jøder saa frit og uanfægtet sender imod Vor Herre Jesus Kristus, hans kære Moder, hele Kristenheden, Øvrigheden og os selv. Lad dem ikke faa hverken Beskyttelse eller Værn, heller ikke Ledsagelse eller Fællesskab med os, saa at hverken I eller Jeres Undersaatter hjælper dem til at faa jeres Penge og Gods ved deres Aagren. Vi har i Forvejen tilstrækkelig at gøre med at bære vore egne Synder fra Pavedømmets Tid, forøger dem dagligt med al Slags Utaknemlighed og Foragt for Guds Værk og al hans Naade, saa det er ikke nødvendigt, at vi yderligere tager Jødernes fremmede, skammelige Laster paa os og endda giver dem Penge og Gods. Lad os tænke os, at vi nu igen dagligt kæmper mod Tyrken, og at vi behøver at lettes for vor egen Syndebyrde og føre et bedre liv. Hermed har jeg renset og lettet min Sarnvittighed, fordi jeg troligt har oplyst og advaret.

Og I, mine kære Herrer og Venner, Præster og Prædikanter, vil jeg hermed indtrængende erindre jer om Jeres Kalds Pligter, saa at I advarer jeres Sognebørn imod den evige Skade de kan lide, og som I godt ved Besked med: 1) nemlig, at de vogter sig for Jøderne og undgaar dem, hvor de kan. Ikke saaledes at de skal forbande dem meget eller paaføre dem personlig Lidelse. Thi de har i alt for høj Grad forbandet og skadet sig selv, naar de forbinder Jesus, Marias Søn, som de nu har gjort mere end 1400 Aar. Overlad det til Øvrigheden. Men enten Øvrigheden tager sig af det eller ikke, saa lad enhver svare for sig selv og huske, at saaledes er en Jøde.

Naar du ser eller tænker paa en Jøde, saa sig til dig selv: Husk, den Mule som jeg ser her, har hver eneste Lørdag Aften forbandet, forhaanet og spyttet paa min kære Herre Jesus Kristus, som har forløst mig med sit dyre Blod, desuden tigget Gud om, at jeg, min Hustru og mine Børn og alle Kristne skulde forkomme paa det jammerligste, - selv vilde gøre, hvad han kunde, for at komme til at eje vort Gods! Maaske har han ogsaa disse Dage mange Gange spyttet over Navnet Ihesu (saadan som de plejer). Og skulde jeg spise, drikke eller tale med saadan en forbandet Mule? Saa kunde jeg lige saa godt æde og drikke med den skinbarlige Djævels Ske eller Kande og paa den Maade gøre mig ens med alle de Djævle, der bor i Jøderne, og spytte af Jesu dyre Blod. Det bevare Gud mig for!

For selv om de ikke har samme Tro som vi, saa kan vi ikke tvinge nogen til at tro (det er umuligt). Men vi kan dog undgaa at bestyrke dem i deres forsætlige Løgne, Laster, Forbandelser og Skændsel og heller ikke give dem Beskyttelse, Skærm, Spise, Drikke, Husly og andre saadannee Venligheder, som man viser sin Nabo. Ogsaa fordi de, saasnart vi er venlige og. tjenstvillige imod dem, stolt og haanligt roser sig af, at de har gjort Gud til deres Herre og os til deres Tjenere. Thi hvorsomhelst en Kriste paa Sabbaten tænder deres Ild, koger for dem i Herberget hvad de ønsker, da vil de til Tak herfor forbande os, spytte paa os og bagvaske os, som om dette var en god Gerning, medens de dog tærer paa vort Gods, som de har stjaalet fra os. Saa fortvivlende, gennemonde, gennemforgiftede, gennemdjævelske er disse Jøder, at de gennem 1400 Aar har været vor Plage, Pestilens, og vor Ulykke og er det den Dag i Dag.

Note1) Er denne indtrængende Advarsel fra Luthers Side mon altid bleven omhyggelig fulgt af alle Præster og Prædikanter? O.E.

I Særdeleshed, I, som er Prædikanter hvor der er Jøder, I maa med Flid foreholde Jeres Herrer og Regenter, at de betænker deres Amts Vigtighed, og hvad de skylder Gud, saa de tvinger Jøderne til at arbejde, forbyder deres Aagren og tøjler deres Laster og Forbandelser. Thi naar de blandt os Kristne straffer Tyve, Røvere, Mordere, Bagvaskere og andre Forbrydere, hvorfor skal saa disse Djævelens Børn Jøderne have Lov til at gøre den Slags Ting hos og imod os? Thi vi lider dog mere gennem dem end Valonerne gennem Spaniolerne. Disse fratager Værten Køkkenet, Kælderen, Kasserne, Pungene, forbander ham og ønsker ham Døden. Alt det samme gør jøderne, vore Gæster, ogsaa imod os, vi er deres Husværter. De røver fra os og suger os tid, hænger os om Halsen, disse dovne Skælme og ugidelige Vomme, drikker, æder, har gode Dage i vore Huse, forbander til Tak Vor Herre Kristus, Kirken, Fyrsterne og os alle, truer og ønsker os uden Ophør Døden o
I Clintenadministrasjonen var det ca 60 jøder i det aller øverste lag. Vi har aldri betvilt at jødetettheten er like stor rundt president Bush Her er en liten del av dem.

Bush Jews

B u s h   J e w s

[Some] Jews in the Bush Administration
. . .contributed by a colleague. . .

Randolph Marshall Bell -- Special Envoy for Holocaust Issues
Although almost certainly not a Chosenite, Bell occupies a specially created post which is another stunning demonstration that the ZOG (Zionist Occupation Govenment) is anything but a figment of the imagination in the minds of "conspiracy nuts" and that Holocaustianity has attained the status of a believe-it-or-face-the-consequences religion (prison in most of Europe; social and economic death in North America -- so far).


U.S. Department of State

Biography of Randolph Marshall Bell

Special Envoy for Holocaust Issues

Mr. Bell was appointed Special Envoy for Holocaust Issues in May 2002.

Mr. Bell entered the Foreign Service in August 1972, following studies at the College of William and Mary (BA, 1969) and Cambridge University (MA, 1971). His early diplomatic assignments included postings in Frankfurt, Prague and Vienna as well as to the State Department Operations Center. He completed Advanced East European Area Studies at the Foreign Service Institute and attended the National Defense University. Mr. Bell subsequently was assigned to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, where he worked on Soviet and East European political issues (1984-1985).

Mr. Bell served as Political-Economic Counselor in Prague (1985-1988) and Political Counselor in Brussels (1989-1993). He directed the Office of Russian and Eurasian Affairs in the Bureau of Intelligence and Research (1993-1996). He also served as Director of the Office of United Kingdom, Ireland and Benelux Affairs in the Bureau of European Affairs (1996-1999), where he managed U.S. policy for relations with these countries. In September 1999, he proceeded to Bern to serve as interim Chargé d'Affaires, returning in the summer of 2000 to take up his assignment as Director for Austria, Germany and Switzerland Affairs (2000-2002).

Mr. Bell has worked extensively on issues related to World War II and the Holocaust. He led the U.S. team that helped organize the December 1997 London Conference on Nazi Gold. He also negotiated the successful closeout of the postwar Tripartite Gold Commission and the subsequent establishment of the $61 million Nazi Persecutee Relief Fund, which provides relief to needy victims who had previously received little or no compensation and also provides resources for projects aimed at preventing similar injustices in the future. Mr. Bell worked closely with Treasury Deputy Secretary Eizenstat to negotiate the two bilateral agreements concluded with Austria in 2000 and 2001 for payments to former World War II forced laborers and to individuals who lost property during that period. In his current capacity as Special Envoy for Holocaust Issues, he serves as a member of the Board of Trustees of the German Foundation, "Remembrance, Responsibility and the Future" and as an observer to the International Commission on Holocaust Era Insurance Claims (ICHEIC).

Mr. Bell has earned the Department of State's Superior Honor Award four times individually and once as a group award recipient. He speaks German, French and Czech.

Mr. Bell is married and has a son. He is a member of the American Foreign Service Association, the Virginia Historical Society, Phi Beta Kappa, the Arlington-East Falls Church Civic Association, and St. Mary's Episcopal Church in Arlington, Virginia.

-- from the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs, August 2002.


Paul Dundes Wolfowitz - Deputy Secretary, Department of Defense

Richard Perle - Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Policy.

Ari Fleischer - White House Press Secretary

Josh Bolten - Deputy Chief of Staff

Ken Melman - White House Political Director

Jay Lefkowitz - Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of the Domestic Policy Council

Daniel Fried - Special Assistant to President and Senior Director for Europeen and Eurasian Affairs

David Frum - Speechwriter

Brad Blakeman - White House Director of Scheduling

Dov Zakheim - Undersecretary of Defense (Controller)

I. Lewis Libby - Chief of Staff to the Vice President

Adam Goldman - White House Liaison to the Jewish Community

Chris Gersten - Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Administration for Children and Families at HHS

Elliott Abrams - now Director of the National Security Council's Office for Near East affairs (!!!). The appointment is viewed as "a gift from heaven" for 'Israel.'

Mark D. Weinberg - Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development for Public Affairs

Douglas Feith - Under Secretary of Defense for Policy

Michael Chertoff - Head of the Justice Department's criminal division

Daniel Kurtzer - Ambassador to Israel ( !!! )

Cliff Sobel - Ambassador to the Netherlands

Stuart Bernstein - Ambassador to Denmark

Nancy Brinker - Ambassador to Hungary

Frank Lavin - Ambassador to Singapore

Ron Weiser - Ambassador to Slovakia

Mel Sembler - Ambassador to Italy

Martin Silverstein - Ambassador to Uruguay

• [Condoleezza Rice] - although not a Jew herself, Rice was mentored by Joseph Korbel, the father of Madeleine Korber-Albright (the hideous Jewess who told an interviewer that the deaths of a half-million Iraqi children resulting from hostile US action were "worth it" because they advanced the "interests" of the U.S.) with whom she still has a very close relationship. Rice, of course, is not White.

• [Colin Powell] - Secretary of State. Harry Belafonte, fellow Jamaican immigrant, calls Powell's silence to the anti-Iraq/Palestine policy of his masters the silence of a "plantation slave" or "Uncle Tom". Whose slave is Powell really? He grew up in a "strongly Jewish" neighborhood of the Bronx where he worked for the Jews as "Shabbas Goy" and learned "passable Yiddish". He likes jews and was called the "Black Jew". When dealing with jewish civilian officials at the Pentagon, Vice Adm. John Baldwin said, Powell used to sprinkle his language with Yiddish.

Assistant Secretary of Defense: Paul Wolfowitz, Undersecretary of Defense under former President Bush, former ambassador to Indonesia, a member of Rockefeller’s Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), a member of the Aspen Institute’s Strategy Group, reportedly attended the 2000 Bilderberg meeting in Belgium, and was a member of Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission as of 2000.

White House Press Secretary: Ari Fleischer, former 2000 Bush campaign spokesman, and previously was communications director for Elizabeth Dole's 2000 campaign. He was also the Presidential Transition Spokesperson 2000-2001.

Deputy Chief of Staff: Joshua B. Bolten, policy director for the 2000 Bush campaign.

Chief Counsel: Jay Lefkowitz, former law partner of Kenneth W. Starr.

Deputy Assistant to the President for Appointments and Scheduling: Brad Blakeman, who spent two years as Lead Advance Representative for Bush/Cheney 2000 and also worked in the same capacity for the Bush/Quayle campaigns in 1988 & 1992. From 1980- 1993, he was a consultant to the offices of the President and Vice President of the United States.

Special Assistant to President and Senior Director for Europeen an Eurasian Affairs Daniel Fried, former ambassador to Poland.

Undersecretary of Defense & Comptroller: Dov S. Zakheim, CEO of System Planning Corporation International and a member of Rockefeller’s Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).

Chief of Staff for the Vice President: I. Lewis Libby, former Deputy Under Secretary of Defense, and a former lawyer for Mark Rich, whom Clinton pardoned. Libby is a member of Rockefeller’s Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).

Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs: Mark D. Weinberg, the Director of issues Management for The McGraw-Hill Companies and was Manager for Marketing Communications and Special Events for the U.S. Postal Service 1994-1999. He served as Director of Public Affairs in the Office of Former President Bush 1989-1991 and as Special Assistant to the President and Assistant Press Secretary for President Reagan 1981-1989.

Under Secretary of Defense for Policy: Douglas Jay Feith, formerly with Feith and Zell, P.C., in Washington, D.C. He served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Negotiations Policy, 1984-1986 and was Special Counsel to Assistant Secretary of Defense Richard Peale 1982-1984. Feith is a graduate of Harvard College and Georgetown University Law Center and is a member of Rockefellers’s Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).

Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division: Michael Chertoff, a Partner with Latham and Watkins in Newark, NJ. He was the U.S. Attorney for New Jersey 1990-1994 and is a graduate of Harvard University and Harvard Law School. He also advised Sen. Alfonse M. D'Amato (R-NY) during the Whitewater investigation.

Senior White House Economic Adviser: Stephen Friedman. Senior principal at Marsh & McLennan Capital, Inc. and limited partner of Goldman-Sachs, after serving as senior chairman of that firm in the mid-1990s and co-chairman or sole chairman from 1990 to 1994. In spring 2000, he was commissioned by Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to make suggestions on how to overhaul the Defense Department's financial structure. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and Rockefeller’s powerful Trilateral Commission.

Regmeister Main Page
Zum deutschen Abschnitt
[to German Section]


Dette er som vi skulle sagt det selv!

Man blir gjerne litt forbløffet når man ser slikt som dette på trykk og man skjønner at det er skrevet av en jøde. Det er helt uvanlig. Ellers er man jo vant til at skylden for jødenes lidelser alltid legges på andre. Selv har de ingen skyld for egen vanskjebne.
Når vil vi fra jødisk hold i dag oppleve erkjennelsen av at den hardhendte behandling de fikk av tyskerne under krigen i det vesentlige skyldtes at de hadde erklært tyskerne krig alt i 1933?

Why Hitler Came to Power  

Why Hitler Came to Power:
One Rabbi’s Explanation

By Rabbi Dr. Manfred Reifer

Although Jewish writers and historians have offered many explanations as to how and why Adolf Hitler came to power, most of them have addressed the topic from a biased point of view. However, one rabbi created quite a stir in 1933 when he offered an objective analysis as to what led to the rise of anti-Semitism not just in Germany but throughout Europe. His reflections are worth consideration as The Barnes Review begins this special look at the period known as “the Holocaust.”

The present situation of the German Jews is the conclusion of an historical process. It is a development the beginning of which can be traced back to the time of Bismarck. It had to come this way, if one understands the deep historical import of this anti-Semitic movement, of which Adolf Hitler is the strongest exponent. Anyone who did not foresee that was afflicted with blindness. One tried to close one’s eyes to the events and acted according to the vulgar principle: “What one does not want, one does not believe.” That was a convenient way to avoid fundamental questions, to look at the world through rose-colored glasses. The advocates of assimilation attempted to throw a veil over things and to play liberalism—long dead—as their last card. They did not understand the course of history, and believed they could evade it by declaring themselves Germans of the Mosaic faith, by denying the existence of a Jewish nation, by severing all threads that bound them to Jewry, by striking out the word “Zion” in their prayer books and introducing Sunday Service. They looked upon anti-Semitism as a passing phenomenon which would be eliminated through intensive propaganda, through organization of a society for fighting it. Such were the thoughts of a great majority of German Jews. And hence the disappointment, the deep resignation in connection with Hitler’s victory, hence the nameless despair, the spreading psychosis that culminated in suicide, the complete loss of morale.

But he who judges the events in Germany according to the principle of causality will have to judge the Nazi movements as the culmination of a natural development; he will also understand that history knows no accidents, that every epoch is the result of the preceding one. And here lies the key to the understanding of the present situation. The fight against Jewdom has been conducted in Germany for half a century intensively and with German thoroughness. Scientific anti-Semitism has taken root in German soil.

All this the German Jews refused to see. They fed themselves on false hope, overlooked reality and dreamed of cosmo politanism of the time of Dohn, Lessing and Mendelssohn. The uprooted Jews gave themselves fantastic ideas and nourished cosmopolitan dreams. And this expressed itself in twofold manner. Either they acclaimed the general liberalism or they became banner carriers of socialism. Both fields of activity furnished new food to anti-Semitism.

In all good faith, to serve themselves and humanity, the Jews began to reach actively into the life of the German people. With characteristic passion they threw themselves upon all fields of knowledge, they took hold of the press, organized the working masses, and strove to influence the whole spiritual life in the direction of liberalism and democracy. This of course would necessarily cause a deep reaction on the part of their host people. When the Jews, for instance, took hold of the so-called international disciplines, whenever they achieved distinction in the fields of physics, chemistry, medicine, astronomy, and to a certain extent in the field of philosophy, they might at most cause envy among their Aryan colleagues, but not general hatred of the whole nation. One did not like to see Jews become bearers of Nobel prizes, but accepted it silently. But in the fields of national disciplines things are quite different. Here every nation strives to develop its own original powers and to transmit to the present and coming generation the fruits of the spiritual labors of the race. It is not a matter of indifference to the people who write its Christmas articles, who celebrate mass, who urge going to church. The people of every nation wish that their young be educated in their own spirit. But while great parts of the German people fought for the maintenance of their kind, we Jews filled with our clamor the streets of Germania. We posed as world reformers and sought to influence public life through our ideas. We rang the bells and called to silent prayer, we prepared the “Lord’s supper” and celebrated resurrection.

We played with the most holy possessions of the people and at times made fun of all that was sacred to the nation. We trusted to the imperishable rights of democracy and felt ourselves as equal citizens of the state within the German community. We posed as censors of the morals of the people, and poured out full cups of satire upon the German Michel. We wanted to be prophets in the pagan fields of Germania and forgot ourselves so far that all this had to draw destruction upon us. <>We made revolutions, and ran as eternal God seekers, ahead of the masses of the people. We gave to the international proletariat a second Bible, one that was adequate to the times, and we roused the passions of the third state. The Jew Marx from Germany, declared war on capitalism and LaSalle [also Jewish—Ed.] organized the masses of the people in Germany itself. The Jew Eduard Bernstein popularized ideology, Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg [also Jew ish—Ed.] called the Spartacist movement to life. The Jew Kurt Eisner created the Bavarian Soviet Republic and was her first, and last, president. And against that the German nation rose up, rebelled. She wanted to forge her own destiny, determine the future of her own children—and she should not have been blamed for it.

What we objected to first of all was the world citizenship, the cosmopolitanism, which had Jews as its front fighters. These uprooted persons imagined they possessed the power to transplant the ideas of Isaiah into the alleys of Germania, and to storm Valhalla with Amos. At times they succeeded in that, but they bury themselves and the Jewish people under the ruins of a world that has collapsed.

One must look at the struggle of the Hitler regime from a different viewpoint, and learn to understand. Have we Jews not rebelled, and conducted bloody wars against everything foreign? What else then were the wars of the Maccabees but protests against a foreign, non-Jewish way of life? And of what consisted the eternal fight of the prophets? Surely of nothing else than eliminating foreign elements, the foreign gods, and of the keeping scared the original nature of Jewdom. Have we not rebelled against the racially related kings of the house of the Idu maeens? And have we not excluded the Samaritans from our community because they practiced mixed marriages? Why should not the German nationalists do the same, when a Kurt Eisner appropriates to himself the prerogatives of the Wittels bachers? We must learn to look truth in the face and to draw last consequences.

Leon Trotsky
Leader of world Bolshevism
We should not want to be false prophets, but to dodge facts does not mean solving the problem. What is occurring today in Germany will come tomorrow in Russia. For all crimes which were the consequences of the Communistic system, the Jews in Soviet Russia will have to suffer some day. We shall have to pay dearly for the fact that Trotsky, Joffe, Sinojew, had leading posts in Soviet Russia.

Was there not more sin against the democratic form in Soviet Russia than in Germany? While in Germany Hitler obtained in the election campaign a majority, in Russia there was no such thing. There a small minority—today after 15 years an organization of barely four millions—proclaimed the dictatorship of the proletariat. . . . The Jews’ attempt in Soviet Russia also to be announcers and pronouncers of the new absolute truth, they strive to interpret the Bolshevist Bible and to influence the ways of thinking of the Russian people. A process that calls forth sharpest resistance and even today leads to anti-Semitic disruption. What will happen when the Soviet government will have fallen and democracy in Russia will celebrate its solemn entrance? Will the Jews fare better than today in Germany? Will not the Russian people behind the Trotskys, the Kamenevs, Sinojews, etc. discover their old Jewish names and let the children suffer for the sins of their fathers? Or will it not even last that long, so that even the father’s turn will come yet? Are there not examples for that? Did not thousands of Jews lose their lives in Hungary because Bela Kun [a Jew—Ed.] erected a Soviet republic on the soil of Stephan the Holy? The Hungarian Jews have paid very dearly for their prophetdom. . . . Within the [communist] Internationale the Jews appear as the most radical element. Germans, French, Poles, Czechs have a home and their internationalism lives itself out in Germany, France, Poland, Czechia. They are autochthonous, under home right. That shows itself in practical life. The Germans in 1914 burned their red flags in the Tiergarten at Berlin and went with the Deutschland on their lips, forth to war. The Polish socialist Daszinski stood in the forefront of the fight for the resurrection of Poland and the Czech socialists sang with enthusiasm their Hatikwah “Kdedomov muj.”

Only the Jews would hear nothing about home and fell as ostensible prophets on the field of liberty. Karl Liebkneckt, Rosa Luxemburg, Kurt Eisner, Gustav Land auer: “No Kaddosh will be spoken, no mass read. . . .”

They, and in the same measure, the children of liberalism, all those poets, authors, artists, journalists, prepared the present time, nourished Jew hatred, furnished the grounds, the material for the era of National Socialism. They all surely desired the best, but attained the opposite. They were cursed with blindness, they saw not the approach of catastrophe, they heard not the footfall of time, the heavy footfalls of time, the heavy footfalls of the Nemesis of History.

Copyright 2001 The Barnes Review. All Right Reserved.

ADL USA American Defense League
dedicated to American interests

Benjamin Freedman sto midt i begivenhetenes sentrum og vet uten tvil hva han snakker om. Han er noe så uvanlig som en jøde som advarer menneskeheten mot "jødene"(Kahzarene). Og når vi hører hva han har å fortelle, skjønner vi fort at her gjelder det å få nevene opp av lommene. Alle jødene i verden bør nå hjelpes hjem!

Benjamin Freedman Speaks

A Jewish Defector Warns America

by Benjamin H. Freedman

Introductory Note: Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing individuals of the 20th century. Mr. Freedman, born in 1890, was a successful Jewish businessman of New York City who was at one time the principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized Jewry after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent the remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States. Mr. Freedman knew what he was talking about because he had been an insider at the highest levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to gain power over our nation. Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, and John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers of our times. This speech was given before a patriotic audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley's patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense. Though in some minor ways this wide-ranging and extemporaneous speech has become dated, Mr. Freedman's essential message to us -- his warning to the West -- is more urgent than ever before. -- K.A.S.

Here in the United States, the Zionists and their co-religionists have complete control of our government. For many reasons, too many and too complex to go into here at this time, the Zionists and their co- religionists rule these United States as though they were the absolute monarchs of this country. Now you may say that is a very broad statement, but let me show you what happened while we were all asleep.

What happened? World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. There are few people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on one side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.

Within two years Germany had won that war: not only won it nominally, but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean. Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, with one week's food supply -- and after that, starvation. At that time, the French army had mutinied. They had lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army was defecting, they were picking up their toys and going home, they didn't want to play war anymore, they didn't like the Czar. And the Italian army had collapsed.

Not a shot had been fired on German soil. Not one enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany. And yet, Germany was offering England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: "Let's call the war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started." England, in the summer of 1916 was considering that -- seriously. They had no choice. It was either accepting this negotiated peace that Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with the war and being totally defeated.

While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and -- I am going to be brief because it's a long story, but I have all the documents to prove any statement that I make -- they said: "Look here. You can yet win this war. You don't have to give up. You don't have to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win this war if the United States will come in as your ally." The United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were young; we were rich; we were powerful. They told England: "We will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to fight with you on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the war." In other words, they made this deal: "We will get the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey." Now England had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody, as the United States would have to promise Japan to Ireland for any reason whatsoever. It's absolutely absurd that Great Britain, that never had any connection or any interest or any right in what is known as Palestine should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the Zionists for bringing the United States into the war. However, they did make that promise, in October of 1916. And shortly after that -- I don't know how many here remember it - - the United States, which was almost totally pro-German, entered the war as Britain's ally.

I say that the United States was almost totally pro-German because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all the media of mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews; and they, the Jews, were pro-German. They were pro-German because many of them had come from Germany, and also they wanted to see Germany lick the Czar. The Jews didn't like the Czar, and they didn't want Russia to win this war. These German-Jew bankers, like Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and they said: "As long as France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent!" But they poured money into Germany, they fought beside Germany against Russia, trying to lick the Czarist regime.

Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine, went to England and they made this deal. At that time, everything changed, like a traffic light that changes from red to green. Where the newspapers had been all pro-German, where they'd been telling the people of the difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects, all of a sudden the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting off babies' hands. They were no good. Shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared war on Germany.

The Zionists in London had sent cables to the United States, to Justice Brandeis, saying "Go to work on President Wilson. We're getting from England what we want. Now you go to work on President Wilson and get the United States into the war." That's how the United States got into the war. We had no more interest in it; we had no more right to be in it than we have to be on the moon tonight instead of in this room. There was absolutely no reason for World War I to be our war. We were railroaded into -- if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into -- that war merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine. That is something that the people of the United States have never been told. They never knew why we went into World War I.

After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they said: "Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let's have something in writing that shows that you are going to keep your bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war." They didn't know whether the war would last another year or another ten years. So they started to work out a receipt. The receipt took the form of a letter, which was worded in very cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn't know what it was all about. And that was called the Balfour Declaration.

The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into the war. So this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill. I don't think I could make it more emphatic than that.

That is where all the trouble started. The United States got in the war. The United States crushed Germany. You know what happened. When the war ended, and the Germans went to Paris for the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 there were 117 Jews there, as a delegation representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. I was there: I ought to know. Now what happened? The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these nations who claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, said, "How about Palestine for us?" And they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration. So the Germans, for the first time realized, "Oh, so that was the game! That's why the United States came into the war." The Germans for the first time realized that they were defeated, they suffered the terrific reparations that were slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted Palestine and were determined to get it at any cost.

That brings us to another very interesting point. When the Germans realized this, they naturally resented it. Up to that time, the Jews had never been better off in any country in the world than they had been in Germany. You had Mr. Rathenau there, who was maybe 100 times as important in industry and finance as is Bernard Baruch in this country. You had Mr. Balin, who owned the two big steamship lines, the North German Lloyd's and the Hamburg-American Lines. You had Mr. Bleichroder, who was the banker for the Hohenzollern family. You had the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big merchant bankers -- the biggest in the world. The Jews were doing very well in Germany. No question about that. The Germans felt: "Well, that was quite a sellout."

It was a sellout that might be compared to this hypothetical situation: Suppose the United States was at war with the Soviet Union. And we were winning. And we told the Soviet Union: "Well, let's quit. We offer you peace terms. Let's forget the whole thing." And all of a sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of the Soviet Union. And throwing them into the war brought about our defeat. A crushing defeat, with reparations the likes of which man's imagination cannot encompass. Imagine, then, after that defeat, if we found out that it was the Chinese in this country, our Chinese citizens, who all the time we had thought were loyal citizens working with us, were selling us out to the Soviet Union and that it was through them that Red China was brought into the war against us. How would we feel, then, in the United States against Chinese? I don't think that one of them would dare show his face on any street. There wouldn't be enough convenient lampposts to take care of them. Imagine how we would feel.

Well, that's how the Germans felt towards these Jews. They'd been so nice to them: from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in Russia failed, and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to Germany. And Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very nicely. And here they had sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other than the fact that they wanted Palestine as a so-called "Jewish commonwealth."

Now Nahum Sokolow, and all the great leaders and great names that you read about in connection with Zionism today, in 1919, 1920, 1921, 1922, and 1923 wrote in all their papers -- and the press was filled with their statements -- that the feeling against the Jews in Germany is due to the fact that they realized that this great defeat was brought about by Jewish intercession in bringing the United States into the war. The Jews themselves admitted that. It wasn't that the Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted better than Coca-Cola or Muenschner Beer. There was no religious feeling. There was no sentiment against those people merely on account of their religious belief. It was all political. It was economic. It was anything but religious. Nobody cared in Germany whether a Jew went home and pulled down the shades and said "Shema' Yisroel" or "Our Father." Nobody cared in Germany any more than they do in the United States. Now this feeling that developed later in Germany was due to one thing: the Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing defeat.

And World War I had been started against Germany for no reason for which Germany was responsible. They were guilty of nothing. Only of being successful. They built up a big navy. They built up world trade. You must remember that Germany at the time of the French Revolution consisted of 300 small city-states, principalities, dukedoms, and so forth. Three hundred separate little political entities. And between that time, between the times of Napoleon and Bismarck, they were consolidated into one state. And within 50 years they became one of the world's great powers. Their navy was rivaling Great Britain's, they were doing business all over the world, they could undersell anybody, they could make better products. What happened as a result of that?

There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia to slap down Germany. There isn't one historian in the world who can find a valid reason why those three countries decided to wipe Germany off the map politically.

When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, they naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed. Not a single hair. Professor Tansill, of Georgetown University, who had access to all the secret papers of the State Department, wrote in his book, and quoted from a State Department document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a Jew whom Cordell Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called camps of political prisoners, who wrote back that he found them in very fine condition. They were in excellent shape, with everybody treated well. And they were filled with Communists. Well, a lot of them were Jews, because the Jews happened to comprise about 98 per cent of the Communists in Europe at that time. And there were some priests there, and ministers, and labor leaders, and Masons, and others who had international affiliations.

Some background is in order: In 1918-1919 the Communists took over Bavaria for a few days. Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht and a group of other Jews took over the government for three days. In fact, when the Kaiser ended the war he fled to Holland because he thought the Communists were going to take over Germany as they did Russia and that he was going to meet the same fate as the Czar. So he fled to Holland for safety, for security. After the Communist threat in Germany was quashed, the Jews were still working, trying to get back into their former status, and the Germans fought them in every way they could without hurting a single hair on anyone's head. They fought them the same way that, in this country, the Prohibitionists fought anyone who was interested in liquor. They didn't fight one another with pistols. Well, that's the way they were fighting the Jews in Germany. And at that time, mind you, there were 80 to 90 million Germans, and there were only 460,000 Jews. About one half of one per cent of the population of Germany were Jews. And yet they controlled all the press, and they controlled most of the economy because they had come in with cheap money when the mark was devalued and bought up practically everything.

The Jews tried to keep a lid on this fact. They didn't want the world to really understand that they had sold out Germany, and that the Germans resented that.

The Germans took appropriate action against the Jews. They, shall I say, discriminated against them wherever they could. They shunned them. The same way that we would shun the Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or anyone in this country who had sold us out to an enemy and brought about our defeat.

After a while, the Jews of the world called a meeting in Amsterdam. Jews from every country in the world attended this meeting in July 1933. And they said to Germany: "You fire Hitler, and you put every Jew back into his former position, whether he was a Communist or no matter what he was. You can't treat us that way. And we, the Jews of the world, are serving an ultimatum upon you." You can imagine what the Germans told them. So what did the Jews do?

In 1933, when Germany refused to surrender to the world conference of Jews in Amsterdam, the conference broke up, and Mr. Samuel Untermyer, who was the head of the American delegation and the president of the whole conference, came to the United States and went from the steamer to the studios of the Columbia Broadcasting System and made a radio broadcast throughout the United States in which he in effect said, "The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them. That will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business." And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany's food supply had to be imported, and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported. So if Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany's population would have to starve. There was just not enough food for more than one third of the population. Now in this declaration, which I have here, and which was printed in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, Mr. Samuel Untermyer boldly stated that "this economic boycott is our means of self-defense. President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the National Recovery Administration," which some of you may remember, where everybody was to be boycotted unless he followed the rules laid down by the New Deal, and which was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of that time. Nevertheless, the Jews of the world declared a boycott against Germany, and it was so effective that you couldn't find one thing in any store anywhere in the world with the words "made in Germany" on it. In fact, an executive of the Woolworth Company told me that they had to dump millions of dollars worth of crockery and dishes into the river; that their stores were boycotted if anyone came in and found a dish marked "made in Germany," they were picketed with signs saying "Hitler," "murderer," and so forth, something like these sit-ins that are taking place in the South. At a store belonging to the R. H. Macy chain, which was controlled by a family called Strauss who also happen to be Jews, a woman found stockings there which came from Chemnitz, marked "made in Germany." Well, they were cotton stockings and they may have been there 20 years, since I've been observing women's legs for many years and it's been a long time since I've seen any cotton stockings on them. I saw Macy's boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around with signs saying "murderers," "Hitlerites," and so forth. Now up to that time, not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt in Germany. There was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was no murder, there was nothing.

Naturally, the Germans said, "Who are these people to declare a boycott against us and throw all our people out of work, and make our industries come to a standstill? Who are they to do that to us?" They naturally resented it. Certainly they painted swastikas on stores owned by Jews. Why should a German go in and give his money to a storekeeper who was part of a boycott that was going to starve Germany into surrendering to the Jews of the world, who were going to dictate who their premier or chancellor was to be? Well, it was ridiculous.

The boycott continued for some time, but it wasn't until 1938, when a young Jew from Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot a German official, that the Germans really started to get rough with the Jews in Germany. And you found them then breaking windows and having street fights and so forth.

Now I don't like to use the word "anti-Semitism" because it's meaningless, but it means something to you still, so I'll have to use it. The only reason that there was any feeling in Germany against Jews was that they were responsible for World War I and for this world-wide boycott. Ultimately they were also responsible for World War II, because after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for the Jews and Germany to lock horns in a war to see which one was going to survive. In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had decided that Europe is going to be Christian or Communist: there is no in between. And the Germans decided they were going to keep it Christian if possible. And they started to re-arm. In November 1933 the United States recognized the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was becoming very powerful, and Germany realized that "Our turn was going to come soon, unless we are strong." The same as we in this country are saying today, "Our turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong." Our government is spending 83 or 84 billion dollars for defense. Defense against whom? Defense against 40,000 little Jews in Moscow that took over Russia, and then, in their devious ways, took over control of many other countries of the world.

For this country now to be on the verge of a Third World War, from which we cannot emerge a victor, is something that staggers my imagination. I know that nuclear bombs are measured in terms of megatons. A megaton is a term used to describe one million tons of TNT. Our nuclear bombs had a capacity of 10 megatons, or 10 million tons of TNT, when they were first developed. Now, the nuclear bombs that are being developed have a capacity of 200 megatons, and God knows how many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have.

What do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may develop into a nuclear war, humanity is finished. Why might such a war take place? It will take place as the curtain goes up on Act 3: Act 1 was World War I, Act 2 was World War II, Act 3 is going to be World War III. The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are determined that they are going to again use the United States to help them permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government. That is just as true as I am standing here. Not alone have I read it, but many here have also read it, and it is known all over the world.

What are we going to do? The life you save may be your son's. Your boys may be on their way to that war tonight; and you don't know it any more than you knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists made a deal with the British War Cabinet to send your sons to war in Europe. Did you know it at that time? Not a person in the United States knew it. You weren't permitted to know it. Who knew it? President Wilson knew it. Colonel House knew it. Other insiders knew it.

Did I know it? I had a pretty good idea of what was going on: I was liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President Wilson was elected, and there was talk around the office there. I was "confidential man" to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of the finance committee, and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the treasurer. So I sat in these meetings with President Wilson at the head of the table, and all the others, and I heard them drum into President Wilson's brain the graduated income tax and what has become the Federal Reserve, and I heard them indoctrinate him with the Zionist movement. Justice Brandeis and President Wilson were just as close as the two fingers on this hand. President Woodrow Wilson was just as incompetent when it came to determining what was going on as a newborn baby. That is how they got us into World War I, while we all slept. They sent our boys over there to be slaughtered. For what? So the Jews can have Palestine as their "commonwealth." They've fooled you so much that you don't know whether you're coming or going.

Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, "Gentlemen, any witness who you find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his testimony." I don't know what state you come from, but in New York state that is the way a judge addresses a jury. If that witness told one lie, disregard his testimony.

What are the facts about the Jews? (I call them Jews to you, because they are known as Jews. I don't call them Jews myself. I refer to them as so-called Jews, because I know what they are.) The eastern European Jews, who form 92 per cent of the world's population of those people who call themselves Jews, were originally Khazars. They were a warlike tribe who lived deep in the heart of Asia. And they were so warlike that even the Asiatics drove them out of Asia into eastern Europe. They set up a large Khazar kingdom of 800,000 square miles. At the time, Russia did not exist, nor did many other European countries. The Khazar kingdom was the biggest country in all Europe -- so big and so powerful that when the other monarchs wanted to go to war, the Khazars would lend them 40,000 soldiers. That's how big and powerful they were.

They were phallic worshippers, which is filthy and I do not want to go into the details of that now. But that was their religion, as it was also the religion of many other pagans and barbarians elsewhere in the world. The Khazar king became so disgusted with the degeneracy of his kingdom that he decided to adopt a so-called monotheistic faith -- either Christianity, Islam, or what is known today as Judaism, which is really Talmudism. By spinning a top, and calling out "eeny, meeny, miney, moe," he picked out so-called Judaism. And that became the state religion. He sent down to the Talmudic schools of Pumbedita and Sura and brought up thousands of rabbis, and opened up synagogues and schools, and his people became what we call Jews. There wasn't one of them who had an ancestor who ever put a toe in the Holy Land. Not only in Old Testament history, but back to the beginning of time. Not one of them! And yet they come to the Christians and ask us to support their armed insurrections in Palestine by saying, "You want to help repatriate God's Chosen People to their Promised Land, their ancestral home, don't you? It's your Christian duty. We gave you one of our boys as your Lord and Savior. You now go to church on Sunday, and you kneel and you worship a Jew, and we're Jews." But they are pagan Khazars who were converted just the same as the Irish were converted. It is as ridiculous to call them "people of the Holy Land," as it would be to call the 54 million Chinese Moslems "Arabs." Mohammed only died in 620 A.D., and since then 54 million Chinese have accepted Islam as their religious belief. Now imagine, in China, 2,000 miles away from Arabia, from Mecca and Mohammed's birthplace. Imagine if the 54 million Chinese decided to call themselves "Arabs." You would say they were lunatics. Anyone who believes that those 54 million Chinese are Arabs must be crazy. All they did was adopt as a religious faith a belief that had its origin in Mecca, in Arabia. The same as the Irish. When the Irish became Christians, nobody dumped them in the ocean and imported to the Holy Land a new crop of inhabitants. They hadn't become a different people. They were the same people, but they had accepted Christianity as a religious faith.

These Khazars, these pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns, were a Mongoloid race who were forced out of Asia into eastern Europe. Because their king took the Talmudic faith, they had no choice in the matter. Just the same as in Spain: If the king was Catholic, everybody had to be a Catholic. If not, you had to get out of Spain. So the Khazars became what we call today Jews. Now imagine how silly it was for the great Christian countries of the world to say, "We're going to use our power and prestige to repatriate God's Chosen People to their ancestral homeland, their Promised Land." Could there be a bigger lie than that? Because they control the newspapers, the magazines, the radio, the television, the book publishing business, and because they have the ministers in the pulpit and the politicians on the soapboxes talking the same language, it is not too surprising that you believe that lie. You'd believe black is white if you heard it often enough. You wouldn't call black black anymore -- you'd start to call black white. And nobody could blame you.

That is one of the great lies of history. It is the foundation of all the misery that has befallen the world.

Do you know what Jews do on the Day of Atonement, that you think is so sacred to them? I was one of them. This is not hearsay. I'm not here to be a rabble-rouser. I'm here to give you facts. When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue, you stand up for the very first prayer that you recite. It is the only prayer for which you stand. You repeat three times a short prayer called the Kol Nidre. In that prayer, you enter into an agreement with God Almighty that any oath, vow, or pledge that you may make during the next twelve months shall be null and void. The oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not be a vow; the pledge shall not be a pledge. They shall have no force or effect. And further, the Talmud teaches that whenever you take an oath, vow, or pledge, you are to remember the Kol Nidre prayer that you recited on the Day of Atonement, and you are exempted from fulfilling them. How much can you depend on their loyalty? You can depend upon their loyalty as much as the Germans depended upon it in 1916. We are going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and for the same reason.

åBenjamin Freedman taler ud

åØBenjamin Freedman taler ud

- en jødisk afhopper advarer Amerika

Indledende forklaring: Den nu afdøde Benjamin H. Freedman var en af det tyvende århundredes mest fascinerende og forbavsende personligheder. Freedman, født 1890, var en succesfuld jødisk forretningsmand i New York, og han var på et tidspunkt vigtigste indehaver af Woodbury Soap Company. Han brød med den organiserede jødedom efter den jødisk-kommunistiske sejr i 1945 og viede resten af sit liv og den altovervejende del af sin betydelige formue (mindst 2,5 millioner dollar) til at afsløre det jødiske tyranni, der havde indhyllet De forenede Stater. Han vidste, hvad han talte om, fordi han selv havde været med i toppen af den inderkreds i de jødiske organisationer og i de jødiske intriger, der skulle erobre magten [over USA]. Freedman var personlig bekendt af Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermeyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, John F. Kennedy samt mange andre af de store navne, der har bestemt dette århundredes gang. Det følgende foredrag blev holdt for et patriotisk publikum i 1961 på Willard Hotel i Washington D.C. på foranledning af Conde McGinley´s patriotiske blad fra den tid - "Common Sense". Selv om dette vidtfavnende og improviserede foredrag på mindre betydningsfulde punkter er blevet forældet, er Freedmans vitale besked til os - hans advarsel til Vesten - mere påtrængende nu end nogensinde tidligere ----------

Her i De Forenede Stater har zionisterne og deres religions-fæller fuldstændig kontrol over vor regering. Af mange grunde - for mange og for komplicerede til at komme ind på her - regerer zionisterne og deres religions-fæller De Forenede Stater som om de var de absolutte monarker i landet. I vil måske sige, at det er en meget stærk påstand, men lad mig vise Jer, hvad der skete, mens vi alle sov.

Hvad skete der? Første Verdenskrig brød ud i sommeren 1914. Der er kun få personer her, der er på alder med mig, og som kan huske det. Denne krig førtes på den ene side af Storbritannien, Frankrig og Rusland; og på den anden af Tyskland, Østrig-Ungarn og Tyrkiet.

På to år havde Tyskland vundet den krig: Ikke kun tilsyneladende men rent faktisk. De tyske ubåde, der var en stor overraskelse for verden, havde fjernet alle konvojerne fra Atlanterhavets overflade. Storbritannien stod nu dér, uden ammunition til sine soldater og med én uges madforsyning tilbage, og derefter - sultedød. På det tidspunkt havde den franske hær gjort mytteri. Den havde mistet 600.000 af den franske ungdoms blomst under forsvaret af Verdun ved Somme-floden. Den russiske hær var i oprør. De samlede deres grej op og ville hjem, og de kunne ikke lide zaren. Og den italienske hær var brudt sammen.

Ikke ét skud var blevet affyret på tysk jord. Ikke én fjendtlig soldat havde krydset grænsen ind til Tyskland. Og på trods heraf tilbød Tyskland England fred. Det tilbød England forhandlingsfred på basis af det, advokater kalder status quo ante . Det betyder: "Lad os stoppe krigen og lade alt være, som det var før krigen startede." England overvejede i sommeren 1916 dette tilbud - alvorligt. Det havde intet valg. Det var enten at acceptere denne forhandlingsfred, som Tyskland storsindet tilbød, eller fortsætte med krigen og blive totalt besejret.

Medens dette foregik, besøgte de tyske zionister, der repræsenterede Østeuropas zionister, det britiske krigsministerium og - (jeg vil her gå hurtigt frem, for det er en lang historie, men jeg har alle de dokumenter der skal til for at bevise enhver påstand, jeg fremsætter) - de sagde: "Hør her. I kan endnu vinde denne krig. I behøver ikke give op. I behøver ikke tage mod den forhandlede fred, som Tyskland tilbyder Jer. I kan vinde denne krig, hvis De forenede Stater vil komme ind som Jeres allierede." De forenede Stater var ikke med i krigen på dette tidspunkt. Vi var friske; vi var unge; vi var rige; vi var stærke. De fortalte England: "Vi vil garantere Jer at bringe De forenede Stater ind i krigen som jeres forbundsfælle, og kæmpe på Jeres side, hvis I vil love os Palæstina efter I har vundet krigen". Med andre ord, lavede de denne handel: "Vi vil få USA ind i denne krig som jeres allierede. Prisen, I må betale er Palæstina, efter I har vundet krigen og besejret Tyskland, Østrig-Ungarn og Tyrkiet". Imidlertid var sagen den, at England havde lige så meget ret til at love Palæstina til nogen, som USA ville have til at love Japan til Irland på grund af et eller andet. Det er ganske absurd, at Storbritannien, der aldrig havde nogen forbindelser, interesser eller rettigheder i det, der er kendt som Palæstina, skulle tilbyde området, som rigets mønt, til zionisterne for at bringe USA ind i krigen. Ikke desto mindre gav de dette løfte i oktober 1916. Og ganske kort herefter - jeg ved ikke, hvor mange hér husker det - trådte De forenede Stater, som var næsten helt og holdent pro-tysk, ind i krigen som Storbritanniens allierede.

Jeg siger, at De forenede Stater var næsten helt og holdent pro-tysk, fordi aviserne hér var kontrolleret af jøder, banklederne var jøder, alle massekommuikationens medier i dette land var kontrolleret af jøder; og de, jøderne, var pro-tyske. De var pro-tyske, fordi mange af dem var kommet fra Tyskland, og også fordi de ønskede at se Tyskland slå zaren. Jøderne kunne ikke lide zaren, og de ønskede ikke, at Rusland skulle vinde denne krig. Disse tysk-jødiske bankfolk, som Kuhn Loeb og de andre store bankforetagender i USA nægtede at finansiere Frankrig eller England med så meget som én dollar. De vendte sig bort og de sagde: "Så længe Frankrig og England er forbundet med Rusland - ikke så meget som en øre!" Men de øsede penge ind i Tyskland, de kæmpede på Tysklands side mod Rusland, i forsøg på at slå zarens regime ud.

Disse selv samme jøder tog til England og de lavede denne handel, da de så muligheden for at få Palæstina. På dette tidspunkt ændrede alt sig, fuldstændig som et trafiklys, der skifter fra rødt til grønt. Dér, hvor alle aviserne før havde været helt pro-tyske, hvor de havde haft travlt med at fortælle folk om de vanskeligheder, Tyskland havde med at bekæmpe England handelsmæssigt og på andre områder, var tyskerne pludselig det rene skidt. De var slyngler. De var "hunner". De skød Røde Kors-sygeplejersker. De skar babyers hænder af. De var simpelthen ingenting værd. Kort tid herefter erklærede præsident Wilson krig mod Tyskland.

Zionisterne i London havde sendt telegrammer til De forenede Stater, til højesteretsdommer Brandeis, der lød: "Arbejd på præsident Wilson. Vi er ved at få, hvad vil vil have fra England. Nu skal I gå i gang med at arbejde på præsident Wilson og få USA ind i krigen." Det var sådan USA kom med i krigen. Anden interesse i den havde vi ikke; Vi havde ikke nogen større ret til at være med i den, end vi i aften ville have til at være på månens bagside i stedet for i dette lokale. Der var overhovedet ingen grund til, at Første Verdenskrig skulle være vores krig. Vi blev presset ind i - hvis jeg må være lidt vulgær, blev vi svindlet og "rullet" ind i den krig alene for, at zionisterne kunne få Palæstina. Det er en ting De forenede Staters borgere aldrig er blevet fortalt. De anede aldrig hvorfor vi kom med i Første Verdenskrig.

Efter vi var kommet med i krigen tog zionisterne så til Storbritannien og der sagde de: "Nå, nu har vi udført vores del af aftalen. Lad os få noget på skrift der viser, at I agter at holde jeres del med at give os Palæstina efter I har vundet krigen." De vidste ikke, om krigen ville vare ét år eller ti år endnu. Så de gik i gang med at udfærdige en kvittering. Kvitteringen blev i form af et brev, skrevet i meget kryptisk sprog, således at den øvrige verden ikke ville vide, hvad det drejede sig om. Og den blev kaldt "Balfour Deklarationen" ( The Balfour Declaration)

Balfour Deklarationen var blot Storbritanniens løfte om at betale zionisterne, hvad der var aftalt, som modydelse for at få USA med i krigen. Så denne store og højtidelige Balfour Deklaration, som man hører så meget om, er lige så fusket som en tredollarseddel. Jeg tror ikke, jeg kan understrege det tydeligere.

Det er her, alle besværlighederne startede. USA kom med i krigen. USA knuste Tyskland. Ved I så, hvad der skete? Da krigen sluttede, og tyskerne tog til Versailles, til Fredskonferencen i Paris i 1919, var der også 117 jøder dér, som en delegation, der repræsenterede jøderne, og den blev ledt af Bernard Baruch. Jeg var der også: så jeg skulle vide det. Og hvad skete så? Jøderne sagde på denne fredskonference, hvor Tyskland blev skåret op og Europa blev stykket ud til alle disse nationer, der hævdede en ret til et bestemt stykke Europæisk territorium: "Hvad med Palæstina til os?" Hvorefter de for første gang - i tyskernes nærhed - fremdrog denne Balfour Deklaration. Tyskerne erkendte nu - for første gang: "Så dét var, hvad spillet gik ud på! Dét var grunden til, at USA kom med i krigen". Tyskerne blev nu - for første gang - bevidste om, at de var blevet besejret og nu måtte lide under disse forfærdelige krigsskadeserstatninger, der blev påtvunget dem, fordi zionisterne ønskede Palæstina og var besluttede på at få det for enhver pris.

Dette bringer os til en anden interessant pointe. Da tyskerne blev klar over sagens sammenhæng, havde de naturligvis modvilje mod denne. Frem til dette tidspunkt havde jøder ikke haft det bedre i noget andet land i verden end netop Tyskland. Hér var hr. Rathenau, der måske var 100 gange så betydningsfuld i industri- og finansverdenen som Bernard Baruch er i dette land. Hér var hr. Balin, der ejede de to store dampskibslinier North German Lloyd´s og Hamburg-Amerika linien. Hér fandtes hr. Bleichroder, der var bankforbindelse for Hohenzollern-familien. Der var Warburgerne i Hamburg, som var de store investerings-bankierer, verdens største. Jøderne havde det meget fint i Tyskland. Ingen tvivl om den sag. Og tyskerne følte: "Dét var godt nok et temmelig stygt forræderi".

Det var et forræderi, der kan sammenlignes med følgende tænkte situation: Forestil Jer, at De forenede Stater var i krig mod Sovjetunionen. Og vi var ved at vinde. Og vi så sagde til Sovjet: "OK. Lad os stoppe. Vi tilbyder jer fredsbetingelser uden krav. Lad os glemme det hele." Så kom lige med ét Kommunistkina med i krigen som Sovjets allierede. Og inddragelsen af dét medførte vores nederlag. Et knusende nederlag med erstatninger, som overgik menneskers fatteevne. Forestil Jer så, at vi, efter dette nederlag fandt ud af, at det var kineserne i dette land, vores kinesiske medborgere, som vi hele tiden havde troet var loyale borgere, der arbejdede sammen med os, der havde forrådt os til Sovjetunionen. At det var ved deres hjælp, at Kina var blevet bragt ind i krigen mod os. Hvordan ville vi da, i USA, føle mod kineserne? Jeg tror ikke en eneste af dem ville vove at vise sit ansigt på nogen gade. Der ville ikke være nok ledige lygtepæle til at klynge dem op i. Forestil Jer, hvordan vi ville have det.

Og sådan følte tyskerne mod disse jøder. De havde endda været så flinke ved dem: Fra 1905 og frem, da den første kommunistiske revolution i Rusland slog fejl, og jøderne måtte fare over hals og hoved ud af Rusland, da tog de alle til Tyskland. Og tyskland gav dem asyl. Og de blev behandlet meget pænt. Og her havde de nu forrådt Tyskland uden nogen anden grund end at de ønskede Palæstina som en såkaldt "jødisk commonwealth" (jødisk statssamfund, "nationalt hjem", red.).

Nahum Sokolow, og alle de store ledere og navne, vi læser om i forbindelse med zionismen i dag - de skrev i alle deres blade i 1919, 1920, 1921, 1922 og 1923 - og pressen var fyldt med deres udtalelser - at følelsen mod jøderne i Tyskland var fremkaldt af, at tyskerne blev klar over, at dette store nederlag var forårsaget ved jødisk mellemkomst ved at bringe USA ind i krigen. Jøderne selv indrømmede dette. Det var ikke noget med, at tyskerne i 1919 opdagede, at et glas jødisk blod smagte bedre end Coca-Cola eller Münschener øl. Der var ikke nogen religiøs følelse i det. Det var helt igennem politisk. Det var økonomisk. Det var alt andet end religiøst. Ingen interesserede sig i Tyskland for, hvor vidt en jøde gik hjem, trak rullegardinet ned og sagde: "Shema´ Yisroel" eller "Fader Vor". Ingen interesserede sig i Tyskland mere for det end de gør i USA. Den følelse, der senere udviklede sig i Tyskland skyldtes én ting: Tyskerne holdt jøderne ansvarlige for deres knusende nederlag.

Og Første Verdenskrig var blevet startet mod Tyskland af årsager, som tyskerne ikke kunne lastes for. De var ikke skyldige i noget som helst. Kun i at være succesfulde. De opbyggede en stor flåde. De opbyggede verdenshandel. I må huske, at Tyskland på den franske revolutions tid bestod af 300 små bystater, prinsedømmer, hertugdømmer og så videre. Trehundrede separate små politiske enheder. Og i den mellemliggende tid, i tiden mellem Napoleon og Bismarck, var de blevet slået sammen til én stat. Inden for 50 år var de derefter blevet en af verdens stormagter. Tyskernes flåde rivaliserede med Storbritanniens, de lavede forretning over alt på jordkloden, de kunne sælge billigere end alle andre, og de kunne lave bedre produkter. Hvad skete som resultat af dette?

Der kom en sammensværgelse mellem England, Frankrig og Rusland, som skulle slå Tyskland ned. Der findes ikke en historiker i verden, der kan finde en gyldig grund til, at disse tre lande besluttede at slette Tyskland politisk fra landkortet.

Da Tyskland erfarede, at jøderne var skyld i dets nederlag, frastødte det dem naturligvis. Men der blev ikke krummet et hår på nogen jødes hoved. Ikke et eneste hår. Professor Tansill fra Georgetown Universitet, der havde adgang til alle udenrigsministeriets hemmelige papirer, skrev det i sin bog, og han citerede fra et udenrigministerielt dokument, skrevet af Hugo Schoenfelt - en jøde, som Cordell Hull sendte til Europa i 1933 for at undersøge de såkaldte lejre for politiske fanger. Han skrev tilbage, at de var i strålende forfatning, og at alle blev behandlet godt. At lejrene var fyldt med kommunister. Og en masse af dem var jøder, ganske enkelt fordi jøderne udgjorde omkring 98 procent af kommunisterne i Europa på den tid. Desuden var der nogle præster, nogle fagforeningsledere, frimurere og andre, der havde internationale forbindelser.

Lidt baggrund er her på sin plads: I 1918-19 tog kommunisterne magten i Bayern i nogle få dage. Rosa Luxemburg og Karl Liebknecht og en gruppe andre jøder erobrede regeringsmagten i tre dage. Faktisk flygtede "der Kaiser", da han sluttede krigen, til Holland, fordi han regnede med, at kommunisterne ville overtage Tyskland, således som de gjorde i Rusland, og at han ville lide samme skæbne som zaren. Så han flygtede til Holland for at komme i sikkerhed. Efter at kommunist-truslen i Tyskland var undertrykt, arbejdede jøderne videre på at komme tilbage til deres tidligere status, og tyskerne bekæmpede dem på enhver mulig måde, uden at krumme et hår på nogens hoved. De bekæmpede dem på samme måde som "forbudstilhængerne" i dette land bekæmpede enhver, der var interesseret i alkohol. De bekæmpede ikke hinanden med pistoler. Og det var på denne måde de bekæmpede jøderne i Tyskland. Og på dette tidspunkt, må I huske, var der 80-90 millioner tyskere og der var kun 460.000 jøder. Omkring det halve af én procent af befolkningen var jøder. Og de kontrollerede hele pressen - og de kontrollerede det meste af økonomien fordi de var kommet ind med billige penge, da marken blev devalueret, og opkøbte praktisk taget alting.

Jøderne prøvede at lægge låg på denne kendsgerning. De ønskede ikke, at verden virkelig skulle forstå, at de havde forrådt Tyskland - og at tyskerne havde modvilje imod dette.

Tyskerne tog passende forholdsregler mod jøderne. De diskriminerede mod dem, kan vi sige, hvorsomhelst de kunne. De skyede dem. På samme måde som vi ville sky kineserne, negrene eller katolikerne - eller hvemsomhelst i dette land, der havde forrådt os til en fjende og sikret vores nederlag.

Efter nogen tid indkaldte verdens jøder til et møde i Amsterdam. Jøder fra alle lande i verden deltog i dette møde i juli 1933. Og de sagde til Tyskland: "I har at fyre Hitler, og putte hver eneste jøde tilbage i hans tidligere stilling, uanset om han var kommunist eller hvad han måtte være. I kan ikke behandle os på den måde. Og vi, verdens jøder, stiller jer et ultimatum." I kan forestille Jer, hvad tyskerne sagde til dem. Og hvad gjorde jøderne så?

Da Tyskland i 1933 afviste at overgive sig til jødernes verdenskonference i Amsterdam, brød konferencen op og mr. Samuel Untermeyer, der var leder af den amerikanske delegation og præsident for hele konferencen, kom tilbage til De forenede Stater. Han tog direkte fra damperen til Columbia Broadcasting Systems studier, hvorfra han rent faktisk sagde: "Verdens jøder erklærer nu Hellig Krig mod Tyskland. Vi er nu engageret i en hellig konflikt med tyskerne. Og vi vil udsulte dem til at overgive sig. Vi vil anvende en verdensomspændende boykot imod dem. Det vil udslette dem, fordi de er afhængige af deres eksporthandel". Og det er en kendsgerning, at to trediedele af Tysklands fødevarebeholdning måtte importeres, og at den kun kunne importeres ved hjælp af indkomsten fra det, de eksporterede. Så hvis Tyskland ikke kunne eksportere, måtte to trediedele af Tysklands befolkning sulte til døde. Der var ganske enkelt ikke føde til mere end en trediedel af befolkningen. I denne erklæring, som jeg har her, og som blev trykt i New York Times 7. august 1933, udtalte mr. Samuel Untermeyer kækt og frejdigt at "denne økonomiske boykot er vores metode til selvforsvar. Præsident Roosevelt har anbefalet brugen af den i National Recovery Administration" , hvor, som nogle af Jer måske kan huske, alle skulle boykottes med mindre de fulgte reglerne i New Deal, hvad den tids Supreme Court (Højesteret) kendte grundlovsstridigt. Ikke desto mindre erklærede verdens jøder boykot mod Tyskland og den var så effektiv, at I ikke kunne finde én ting i nogen forretning i verden med ordene "Made in Germany" på. Faktisk fortalte en leder i Woolworth Company mig, at de havde måttet smide for millioner af dollars stentøj i floden; at deres forretninger blev boykottet, hvis nogen kom ind og fandt en tallerken mærket med "Made in Germany". Der blev demonstreret foran deres forretninger med skilte, som sagde "Hitler", "mordere" og så videre, noget i stil med de sit-ins, der foregår i Syden. I en forretning, tilhørende R.H. Macey-kæden, der kontrolleredes af en familie ved navn Strauss, som også er jøder, fandt en kvinde nogle damestrømper, som kom fra Chemnitz, mærket "Made in Germany". Det var bomuldstrømper, og de havde måske været i forretningen i 20 år, eftersom jeg har observeret dameben i mange år og det er meget længe siden, jeg har set nogle bomuldstrømper på dem. Jeg så Macey´s blive boykottet, med hundredvis af mennesker, der vandrede rundt med skilte, som sagde "mordere", "Hitlersvin" og så videre. Men op til dette tidspunkt var ikke ét hår blevet krummet på hovedet af nogen jøde i Tyskland. Der var ingen liden, ingen sulten, intet myrderi, der var - intet.

Selvfølgelig sagde tyskerne: "Hvem er disse mennesker, der tillader sig at erklære boykot mod os og kaste alle vore borgere ud i arbejdsløshed, og bringe vor industri til standsning? Hvordan kan de tillade sig at gøre det mod os?" Selvfølgelig viste de modvilje mod det. Naturligvis malede de hagekors på forretninger, der ejedes af jøder. Hvorfor skulle en tysker gå ind i en forretning og give sine penge til en indehaver, der var en del af en boykot, som skulle udsulte Tyskland til at overgive sig til verdens jøder, som ville diktere, hvem deres statsminister eller kansler skulle være? Nej, det var latterligt.

Boykotten fortsatte i nogen tid, men det var ikke før i 1938, da en ung jøde fra Polen spadserede ind i den tyske ambassade i Paris og skød en tysk embedsmand, at tyskerne virkelig begyndte at tage hårdere fat på de tyske jøder. Så begyndt man at se dem smadre ruder, have gadekampe osv.

Jeg har ikke lyst til at bruge udtrykket "anti-semitisme" fordi det er uden mening, men det betyder endnu noget for Jer, så jeg vil blive nødt til at bruge det. Den eneste grund til, at der var nogen uvilje mod jøder i Tyskland var, at de var ansvarlige for Første Verdenskrig og for denne verdensomspændende boykot. I sidste ende var de også ansvarlige for Anden Verdenskrig, for efter at denne sag var løbet løbsk, blev det absolut nødvendigt for jøderne og Tyskland at krydse klinger i en krig for at se, hvem der skulle overleve. Jeg havde i mellemtiden boet i Tyskland, og jeg vidste, at tyskerne havde besluttet, at Europa enten ville blive kristent eller kommunistisk: Der fandtes ingen mellemvej. Og tyskerne besluttede, at de ville holde det kristent, om muligt. Derfor begyndte de at genopruste. I november 1933 anerkendte USA Sovjetunionen. Sovjetunionen var ved at blive meget stærk, og Tyskland erkendte, at "Vores tur vil snart komme, med mindre vi er stærke" Det samme, som vi siger i dette land i dag, "vores tur kommer snart, med mindre vi er stærke. "Vores regering bruger 83 eller 84 milliarder dollars på forsvar. Forsvar mod hvem? Forsvar mod 40.000 små jøder i Moskva, der tog magten i Rusland, og derefter, på deres lumske måder, tog kontrollen med mange andre lande i verden.

At dette land nu kan være på randen af en Tredje Verdenskrig, hvorfra vi ikke kan komme ud som sejrherrer, er noget, der lammer min forestillingsevne. Jeg ved, at atombomber måles i megaton. Et megaton er et udtryk der bruges til at beskkrive en million tons TNT (trotyl). Vore atombomber havde en kapacitet på 10 megatons eller 10 millioner tons TNT, den gang de blev udviklet. Nu er de atombomber, der fremstilles på 200 megatons, og kun Gud ved, hvor mange megatons Sovjetunionens bomber har.

Hvad er det, vi står over for nu? Hvis vi sætter en verdenskrig i gang, som måske udvikler sig til en atomkrig, er menneskeheden færdig. Hvorfor kunne en sådan krig finde sted? Den vil finde sted idet tæppet går op for for Tredje Akt. Første Akt var Første Verdenskrig. Anden Akt var Anden Verdenskrig, og Tredje Akt bliver Tredje Verdenskrig. Verdens jøder, zionisterne og deres religions-fæller overalt, er fast besluttede på igen at bruge USA til at hjælpe dem med at beholde Palæstina som deres springbræt til deres Verdensregering. Det er så sandt som jeg står her. Ikke blot har jeg læst det, men mange her har også læst det, og det er kendt over den ganske verden.

Hvad skal vi gøre? Det liv, du redder, kan være din søns. Dine drenge kan være på vej til denne krig i nat; og du ved ikke mere om det end du vidste, at zionisterne i London i 1916 lavede en handel med det britiske krigsministerium for at sende dine sønner i krig i Europa. Vidste du det den gang? Ikke en eneste person i De forenede Stater vidste det? Præsident Wilson vidste det. Oberst House vidste det. Andre "insidere" vidste det.

Vidste jeg det? Jeg havde en temmelig god forestilling om, hvad der gik for sig: Jeg var forbindelsesmand til Henry Morgenthau, Sr., i præsidentvalgskampagnen i 1912, da præsident Wilson blev valgt, og der snakkedes på kontoret dér. Jeg var "fortrolig mand" for Henry Morgenthau, Sr., der var formand for finansudvalget, og jeg var forbindelsesmand mellem ham og Rollo Wells, finansministeren. Så jeg sad i disse møder med præsident Wilson for bordenden, og alle de andre, og jeg hørte dem hamre det progressive skattesystem og det, der skulle blive til " Federal Reserve" (amerikanske nationalbanksystem) ind i præsident Wilsons hjerne, og jeg hørte dem indoktrinere ham i den zionistiske bevægelse. Højesteretsdommer Brandeis og præsident Wilson var lige så tæt sammen som disse to fingre på min hånd. Præsident Woodrow Wilson var lige så inkompetent til at bestemme, hvad der gik for sig som et nyfødt barn. Det var sådan, de fik os ind i Første Verdenskrig, mens vi alle sov. De sendte vore drenge derover for at blive slagtet. For hvad? Så jøderne kan få Palæstina som deres "Commonwealth". De har snydt Jer så grundigt, at I ikke aner om I er ved at komme eller gå.

En dommer, der belærer en jury, siger: "Mine herrer og damer, ethvert vidne, som I finder har fortalt en løgn, kan I negligere alt vidnesbyrd fra." Jeg ved ikke, hvilke stater I kommer fra, men i staten New York er det sådan, en dommer henvender sig til en jury. Hvis det vidne fortalte én løgn, kan I helt se bort fra hans vidneudsagn.

Hvad er kendsgerningerne angående jøderne? (Jeg kalder dem jøder over for Jer, fordi de er kendt som jøder. Jeg kalder dem ikke selv jøder. Jeg omtaler dem som såkaldte jøder, fordi jeg ved, hvad de er). De østeuropæiske jøder, som udgør 92 procent af verdens bestand af de mennesker, der kalder sig selv jøder, var oprindelig khazarer. De var en krigerisk stamme, der levede i dybt inde i hjertet af Asien. Og de var så krigeriske, at selv asiaterne jog dem ud af Asien og ind i Østeuropa. De oprettede et stort khazar-kongedømme på 800.000 kvadratmiles. På det tidspunkt eksisterede Rusland ikke, og det gjorde ej heller mange andre europæiske lande. Khazar-kongedømmet var det største land i hele Europa -- så stort og så stærkt, at når de andre monarker ønskede at gå i krig, så udlånte khazarerne 40.000 soldater til dem. Så store og magtfulde var de.

De var fallos-tilbedere, hvad der er en snavset affære, og som jeg ikke ønsker at komme dybere ind i detaljerne på her. Men det var deres religion, som det også var religionen for mange andre hedninge og barbarer andre steder i verden. Khazar-kongen blev så led ved sit riges åndelige forfald, at han besluttede at adoptere en såkaldt monoteistisk tro -- enten kristendom, islam eller hvad der i dag kendes som jødedom, men i realiteten er talmud-lære. Ved at dreje en snurretop, og deklamere: "Ælle bælle, mig fortælle...," udvalgte han såkaldt jødedom. Det blev så statsreligionen. Han sendte studenter til de talmudiske skoler i Pumbedita og Sura og bragte tusinder af rabbier tilbage derfra, og han åbnede synagoger og skoler, så hans folk blev, hvad vi kalder jøder. Der var ikke én eneste af dem, der havde en forfader som nogensinde havde sat sine ben i det Hellige Land. Ikke blot inden for Det gamle Testamentes tidsregning, men i det hele taget, fra historiens begyndelse. Ikke een eneste af dem! Og alligevel kommer de til de kristne og beder os støtte deres væbnede oprør i Palæstina ved at sige: "I vil da hjælpe med at bringe Guds Udvalgte Folk tilbage til deres Forjættede Land, vil I ikke? Det er Jeres pligt som kristne. Vi gav Jer en af vore drenge som Jeres Herre og Frelser. Nu går I hen i kirken om søndagen og i knæler og tilbeder en jøde, - og vi er jøder." Men de er hedenske khazarer, der blev omvendt på samme måde som irerne blev omvendt. Det er lige så latterligt at kalde dem "Folk fra Det hellige Land" som det ville være at kalde de 54 millioner kinesiske muslimer for "arabere". Muhammed døde så sent som i år 620 efter Kristus, og siden da har 54 millioner kinesere antaget Islam som deres religiøse tro. Forestil Jer engang: I Kina, over 3.000 kilometer fra Arabien, fra Mekka og Muhammeds fødested. Forestil Jer, at de 54 millioner kinesere besluttede at kalde sig "arabere". I ville sige, de var vanvittige. Enhver, der tror, at disse 54 millioner kinesere er arabere, må være skør. Alt, hvad de gjorde, var at adoptere en religiøs tro, der havde sit udspring i Mekka, i Arabien. Lige som irerne. Da irerne blev kristne, var der ikke nogen, der smed dem i havet og importerede en ny art beboere til "Det hellige Land". De var ikke blevet et anderledes folk. De var det samme folk, men de havde accepteret kristendom som en religiøs tro.

Disse khazarer, disse hedninge, disse asiater, disse tyrkisk-finske mennesker, var af en mongolsk race, der blev tvunget ud af Asien og ind i Østeuropa. Fordi deres konge antog den talmudiske tro havde de intet andet valg. På nøjagtig samme måde som i Spanien: Hvis kongen var katolik, måtte alle være katoliker. Ellers måtte man forlade Spanien. Så khazarerne blev det, vi i dag kalder jøder. Forestil Jer derfor hvor stupidt det var for de store kristne lande i verden at sige: "Vi vil anvende vores magt og prestige til at repatriere Guds Udvalgte Folk til deres forfædres hjemland, deres Forjættede Land." Kunne der tænkes en større løgn end den? Men fordi de kontrollerer aviserne, magasinerne, radioen, fjernsynet, bogindustrien, og fordi de har præster på prædikestolene og politikere på talerstolene til at tale samme sprog, er det ikke særligt overraskende, at I tror på denne løgn. I ville tro, at sort er hvidt, hvis I hørte det længe nok. I ville ikke længere kalde sort for sort. I ville begynde at kalde sort for hvidt. Og ingen kunne anklage Jer for det.

Dette er én af historiens store løgne. Det er fundamentet for al den ulykke, der findes i verden.

Véd I, hvad jøder gør på Forsoningsdagen (jom kippur), som I tror, er så hellig for dem? Jeg var én af dem. Dette er ikke andenhåndsviden. Jeg er kommet her for at give jer kendsgerninger. Når man på Forsoningsdagen går ind i synagogen, står man op til den første bøn, der siges. Det er den eneste bøn, man står op til. Man gentager tre gange en kort bøn, der kaldes Kol Nidre. I denne bøn indgår man en aftale med Gud den Almægtige gående ud på, at et hvilket som helst løfte, æresord eller ed, som man måtte afgive i de næste 12 måneder skal være uden virkning. Løftet skal ikke være et løfte; æresordet ikke et æresord og eden ikke en ed. Ydermere lærer Talmud, at man, når som helst, man afgiver et løfte, et æresord eller en ed, da skal erindre Kol Nidre bønnen fra Forsoningsdagen. Dermed er man fritaget fra at opfylde dem.

Hvor meget kan I stole på deres loyalitet? I kan stole lige så meget på deres loyalitet som tyskerne stolede på det i 1916. Vi kommer til at lide samme skæbne som Tyskland, og af samme grund.